Are the sexes really so different? You bet!

Quiz time:

Six adults and two teenagers are on a river trip. One night, while camping on a beautiful beach, the party splits up by gender. One group snuggles together under sleeping bags, gazes at the stars and shares personal thoughts and feelings. The other group digs a hole in the sand, fills it with the biggest sticks they can find, pours white gas on the pile and proceeds to recreate the burning man festival.

Which group was the men and which was women? Need a hint?

The pyromaniac group included the teenagers farting into the flames to see if the gas would ignite.

Get it now?

What is it that makes us so different? Once again, the age-old question of Nature vs Nurture comes up. But even more baffling is, if men and women are this drastically different, how have we managed to survive as a species?

I was one of those folks who believed that if you raised your children to be different than “typical” boys or girls, then they would be. In other words, I believed in Nurture over Nature.

I now realize that anyone who buys this theory does not have kids. I was going to be one of those parents whose two boys would play with baby dolls and learn to knit. No guns, no rough play and certainly none of those noises that all boys make. What a joke that turned out to be! My sons began the truck sound before they could even say “Mamma.” If they don’t pummel each other on a regular basis, they suffer. They play with dollies all right; they tear off their clothes, their heads, their arms. Knitting needles make great arrows. Need I say more?

Now, this is not specific to boys. I know girls whose parents are rough-and-tumble, live in teepees and whose mothers are more physically competent than many men. These girls have been given trucks and Carhardts. The trucks end up providing transportation for Barbie, Carhardts are rejected in lieu of frilly pink dresses, and make-believe play is about going to a potluck.

No matter what you do, girls are girls and boys are boys.

Last weekend, we went to a llama ranch to train for a backpacking trip. Here, the males and females are separated into different pastures. The males tend to be more independent and less herd-inclined. They are very sensitive due to their tendency to fight and kick below the belt. They were also extremely wound up whenever the females were in sight – even if it was a mile away.

The females, on the other hand, moved in a herd; had, as a group, taken over care and protection of the single baby in the unit; and showed only a mild interest in the males.
Sound familiar? It’s universal. Males and females are not the same; Nature will always win out over Nurture.

Many of you may have already realized this, but may sometimes believe the gap between the sexes is not that great and can be bridged. Then, as I am frequently reminded that this gap is the size of the Grand Canyon, I wonder how it is that we as a species haven’t died out.

Animals are one thing – they’re smarter than we are. Most only come together to procreate and then move on.

Humans, on the other hand, have a twisted need to form relationships, communicate and get along. There are exceptions to these rules; wolves mate for life. (Hmmm, maybe they’re not so smart after all). Some people do only come together for one reason, and, some folks seek compatibility over practicality (procreation) by sticking with the same sex.

My befuddlement is with the men and women (including myself) who continually try to find common ground. I am happily married and wouldn’t trade it for the world, but “Happily Ever After” it is not. I want to talk, he says I talk too much. He forgives and forgets, I over-process. I watch my friends’ children and he stresses over the loss of freedom.

I play with kids, feed them, clean the house, do the laundry, make zucchini bread, fix hot dinners and bring a meal to a sick friend, all while making sure we have Band-aids in the right places and enough red crayons to go around. He has to put the kids in front of the TV to do the dishes.

On the other hand, after a long day at his job, he will work until 3 in the morning building kitchen shelves, whereas I need to “nurture myself” and retreat to bed at 9. He wants “it” every night, while I’m pretty content to sleep in the bunk bed with the kids.

Somehow, though, the will (be it sane or not) to make it work between the sexes is strong enough that we still go on. We have found ways to connect – at least often enough that humans haven’t died out. And most of the time, as difficult it is to communicate with a completely different species, I am thankful that not everyone in this world is just like me. That would be horrific.

Thinking back to that scene on the beach, try to picture the men in the sleeping bags and the women standing around the 10-foot flames. Impossible.

Now, imagine this: If the group had been all women, it would have ended up in a major cat fight or it would have taken three days of “voicing our truths” to launch the boats and float down the river.

If it had been all men, there would have been a contest to see who could rig the fastest, who rowed the heaviest boat and who could kill a bighorn sheep with his bare hands.

Since there would have been no one to cook it, they would have gnawed on the raw meat. But thanks to the balance of estrogen and testosterone, we awoke in the morning, had a wonderful meal, rigged our boats and had a peaceful day on the river.

One last question to ponder. That night on the river, who had the more meaningful experience?

Suzanne Strazza writes from Mancos.

Published in Suzanne Strazza

Rush to judgment

“It is my heartfelt belief that, no matter what your status in life, you can learn what’s possible for you in this country by studying me. And if you attain even a fraction of my level of excellence, you will have arrived.”
“It’s time to start championing old-fashioned virtues like fidelity, chastity, sobriety, self-restraint, self-discipline and self-reliance, and responsibility. . . . Is that too much to ask?”

“Modern-day liberalism is like a disease or an addiction that literally has the power to destroy the character of the person who falls under its spell.”
— Rush Limbaugh, in “See, I Told You So”

Thus wrote the guru of far-right wing-nuts 10 years ago in a pompous piece of puffery that is filled with such self-inflated arrogance from front to back

So where is this sterling example of conservative excellence these days? Why, in drug rehab, right along with all those loathsome products of the permissive baby-boom generation who indulged their hedonistic urges without regard to trifles like personal responsibility and their duty to obey the laws of our land. At least this is how Rush would no doubt portray any liberal in the same fix if he were still telling us “The Way Things Ought to Be” on the radio. (TWTOTB is the name an earlier tome purchased by millions of ditto-heads who apparently hang on his every pronouncement like they came down from Mt. Sinai etched on tablets of stone.)

Rush became addicted to strong opiates several years ago when unsuccessful back surgery left him in great pain, he explained while announcing his impending hiatus last month after being outed by The National Enquirer. What this pillar of veracity (“For, as I have told you, you must have the courage to believe the truth . . . Sometimes the truth hurts . . . But the truth is still the truth. And it needs to be heard.”) didn’t explain is that he was swallowing far more hydrocodone and OxyContin pills than would ever be prescribed for pain relief, enough to remain in a state of drugged euphoria around the clock. And that to satisfy this enormous appetite he bought thousands upon thousands of them illegally from a former maid with connections on the street.

Don’t get me wrong – both as someone who has had my own problems with substance abuse and who now works with detoxifying alcoholics and drug addicts five nights a week, I would never gloat over Rush’s dilemma or take pleasure in his comeuppance.

After all, I like to believe that I’m one of those bleeding hearts he mercilessly ridiculed daily for fun and profit, and as such, can have only empathy and compassion for all people whose lives are so devoid of genuine joys and friendships that they resort to chemical substitutes. As he himself observed, “Most people instinctively realize that happiness and fulfillment are not achieved primarily through materialism. You can’t buy love. You can’t even buy contentment.” (This from a man who is rich as Crosus!)

Still, there is a certain poetic justice in this predicament of a guy who gained fortune and fame by touting moral righteousness and assuring listeners that he was its epitome. (What rhymes with hypocrisy?)

And someone who condemned in no uncertain terms such weaknesses in others: “Too many whites are getting away with drug use,” Rush said in 1995. “The answer is to . . . find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river.”

Now, of course, he has hired Roy Black, one of the best criminal-defense lawyers in the country, to keep him from being “sent up the river.” (Ironically, Black was also the attorney for William Kennedy Smith, who, regardless of being exonerated of a rape charge several years ago, was mocked by Rush in one of his savage song parodies.)

Anyway, I sincerely hope Rush is not charged with any crime, even though he broke the same law that has sent thousands of whites, blacks and all shades in between to prison with felony convictions that essentially ended their chance of having a good life in America. Treating any sort of drug abuse as a criminal matter is as irrational as it is futile, not to mention heartless, and as a bleeding heart. . . .

I hope as well that he is successful in his struggle to kick a bad habit and returns to his broadcast to the great applause of understanding, forgiving fans. For all his arrogant, know-it-all ways, Rush has made some very valid points over the years I’ve occasionally listened to his show. There are, after all, hypocrites and ill-intentioned rascals of all political persuasions, and he has unmasked more than a few who reside left-of-center.

Unfortunately, however, his critical gaze has seldom fallen upon himself or the people whose views support his own. So once he regains this adoring audience — over which he holds almost total sway — I would like to see him publicly re-examine some of his own narrow-minded priorities and prejudices. Maybe even change his opinion about a thing or two, like decriminalizing drugs and providing tax-funded treatment programs for all those desperate addicts who aren’t millionaires.

Perhaps even eat a little crow, because, as he rightly told us: “Even humiliation, when associated with self-induced failure, is part of growing up.”

And coming only half-clean can leave you with a polluted mind.

Published in David Long, November 2003

Mean streets: Crossing Cortez’s byways proves to be no walk in the park

Cortez City Councilman Jim Herrick was driving through Cortez around 3:30 on the afternoon of Oct. 1 when he spotted something strange.

“I was stopped at a stoplight and I caught sight of this object flying through the air and rolling down the road,” he said. “Then I saw it was a man. For a second I thought, ‘This is a funny place to be rolling around’.”

Then he realized the man had been struck by a car.

Rushing to the victim’s side, Herrick was stunned to realize it was City Manager Hal Shepherd. Shepherd, who had been walking back to City Hall after a meeting at the Montezuma County Courthouse, was crossing Main Street in the crosswalk when he was struck by a car turning left onto Main from Ash Street.

Shepherd was taken to the hospital with a fractured wrist, bruised ribs, whiplash, a concussion and multiple cuts and bruises, but he was lucky – he survived. The driver, 56-year-old Paul Bilger of Cortez, was cited for careless driving causing injury.

The accident brought renewed attention to longtime concerns about pedestrian safety in Cortez, particularly downtown. It’s an issue that needs to be addressed, according to Dottie Wayt, a member of the Mainstreet Association, a group of downtown merchants.

In mid-October, the association wrote to Shepherd asking the city to investigate the problem.

“We asked them to address the situation and enforce the existing speed limits because of safety and also because of noise pollution,” Wayt said. “One of the goals of the Mainstreet Association is a more pedestrian-friendly atmosphere and that’s one of the things that destroys it.”

Cortez’s Main Street is also Highway 160, a fact that is a boon to business but a bane to pedestrians. Though patrolled by city police, Main is actually the province of the state. The Colorado Department of Transportation has final say over the number and type of signs that can be erected along Main, the number and location of stoplights, and the amount of time pedestrians are given to get across.

CDOT officials say Main is reasonably safe and has a low rate of pedestrian-vehicle accidents.

But that’s not the way downtown Cortez is perceived. People who walk there regularly see it as a minefield – with grim-faced drivers zooming through intersections on the yellow and red, confusing crosswalks that seem to beckon pedestrians unprotected into traffic, and flashing countdown signals that offer only the fleet of foot adequate time to get to the opposite curb.

“No, I don’t think Cortez is pedestrian-friendly, because people don’t stop at crosswalks,” said Walt Abel of Dolores. “I think Montezuma County is one of the most dangerous places I’ve ever walked or biked.”

Wayt, who works at Cortez Travel on Main, said few drivers obey the posted downtown speed limit of 25 mph. “People really are not observing the speed limit or anything close to it,” she said. “That’s why we took a stand.”

Speeding on Main wasn’t a factor in the accident that sent Shepherd to the hospital. But observers say speeding, driver carelessness, inadequate signs, and insufficient time to cross the street all contribute to a general feeling that downtown Cortez is a risky place to take a stroll.

Susan Keck, owner of Susie’s Hallmark on Main Street, said Shepherd’s accident was an extreme outcome of a fairly common occurrence.

“When you’re crossing the street, a lot of times you’ll have the right of way but there’s a driver on a side street who’s turning who won’t stop,” she said. “I was almost hit one time a couple years ago, because this person was turning left and didn’t pay attention.

“That, I think, is one of the problems that people need to be aware of when they’re making a turn, to pay attention to the crosswalks. They just barrel on through and you’re out there going, ‘Excuse me!’”

But Keck added that pedestrians need to be alert and cautious, too.

“We teach our kids to look both ways when they cross the street, but we as adults tend not to do that,” she said.

Nationwide, although pedestrian fatalities have been declining since 1975, there were 4,739 pedestrians killed by motor vehicles in 2000, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Another 78,000 pedestrians were injured.

According to statistics:

• People are more likely to be killed by a car while walking than to be shot by a stranger.

• Children are the most common victims of pedestrian-vehicle accidents, but elderly pedestrians are the most likely to die in such an accident.

• More than half of adult pedestrians who are killed by vehicle are alcohol-impaired.

Cortez Police Lt. Detective Jim Shethar has been concerned for some time about the situation on Main Street. “I brought this issue up a couple of months ago (with the police chief and city),” he said.

Like many others, he wants to see more and better signs posted to alert drivers to pedestrians. But signage, he learned, is strictly limited by CDOT.

Ed Demming, regional traffic and safety engineer with CDOT in Durango, said he does not see major problems in Cortez. “What we have is a very safe situation. The accident rates in Cortez are very low and there’s not too much driver frustration (because of constant stoplights),” he said. “From my point of view, at least, we’re doing a pretty good job.”

Police said they could not provide statistics on the number of pedestrian-vehicle accidents in Cortez.

Demming says right turns on red, which are legal in all states, are the biggest danger to pedestrians. But he is also concerned about “unsignalized” crosswalks – those without stoplights.

Pedestrians often launch themselves into traffic at places such as Beech and Main, where there is such a crosswalk. Although small signs advise drivers to stop for people in the crosswalks, they rarely do.

Keck said she tries to stop for pedestrians, but it seems to create more problems. “It’s almost scary. You don’t know whether to stop, because you’re afraid the person in the lane beside you will barrel on by and hit the pedestrian, or you’ll get rear-ended (by a driver that doesn’t stop),” she said.

The Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities says that, at intersections lacking signals, drivers should yield to pedestrians in crosswalks “when the pedestrian is upon the half of the roadway upon which the vehicle is traveling or when the pedestrian is approaching so closely from the opposite half of the roadway as to be in danger.”

What that means, according to Cortez Police Lt. Darrell Hinton, is that a driver traveling on Main in the far right lane wouldn’t have to stop for a pedestrian leaving the curb on the opposite site. But once the pedestrian reaches the next lane of traffic – the “middle half” of the street, as it were – drivers should stop.

Drivers should also stop in both lanes in one direction if another driver is stopped, Hinton said. But saying a driver “should” stop doesn’t mean he will.

“It’s a very confusing law and very difficult to enforce,” Shethar said. Also, budget cuts have left the police department under-staffed, which means fewer cars available to patrol.

And ticketing someone for failure to yield to a pedestrian is somewhat of a dicey proposition, Hinton said. Unless the officer can get the pedestrian to testify, it’s simply the officer’s word against the driver’s.

Demming advises pedestrians simply not to use crosswalks without a light. “On a four-lane street like in Cortez, that’s the worst place for a pedestrian to cross, because one car will stop in one lane and the other car doesn’t know why,” he said.

A common complaint in Cortez is insufficient time to cross the road. People in pedestrian-friendly downtown Durango have 28 seconds to cross even small side streets off of that city’s Main, which is not a state highway.

In contrast, pedestrians seeking to cross Cortez’s 75-foot-wide Main Street get anywhere from 22 seconds (at Mildred and at Harrison, by City Market) to 17 (at Chestnut).

To cross Main’s side streets, pedestrians are allowed up to 17 seconds (on Market) or as few as 11 (on Harrison).

“Is it enough time for someone who’s 78, with a cane?” asked Hinton. “Ask CDOT.”

Demming said the Main Street crossings should be the same length of time. But he said the time is adequate if you leave the curb promptly when the signal changes. An industry rule of thumb is to assume pedestrians can walk 4 feet per second, but that presumes the walker is reasonably fit and the streets aren’t icy.

Crossing times can’t be too lengthy or drivers will become frustrated at having to stop too often and too long, which can cause more problems, he said.

For decades city planners nationwide have struggled to improve pedestrian safety. Some measures have already helped in the local region, Demming said, such as bright, inlaid plastic crosswalks and the time-countdown signals.

Cities such as Salt Lake City, Utah, have tried many other tactics. One involves having pedestrians pick up orange flags as they leave the curb and hold them as they cross, to increase visibility.

But Shethar, told of that idea, sighed.

“Who knows where those flags would be in 10 months?” he said, describing how a plan to provide free bikes for use in Cortez years ago ended after all the bikes were stolen.

Other measures Salt Lake City has employed include in-pavement or overhead blinking lights, activated by pedestrians, that alert motorists that someone is walking. But such measures cost money, something the city of Cortez does not have in abundance.

Many local citizens would like to see “pop-up” pedestrian signs in the center of Main, like the sign on Mildred Avenue between the city’s parks, which has been effective in alerting drivers to the 20-mph speed limit there.

But Demming said CDOT’s policies forbid putting such signs along Main because they’re distracting to drivers. “It’s more stuff in the way,” he said.

The Mainstreet Association hopes the city will consider installing narrow, raised medians along Main, which slow traffic and give pedestrians an island of safety, Wayt said.

“We’d rather do something now before something bad happens,” she said.

But Demming said signs, lights, and other technical solutions can only do so much. What needs to change, he believes, is driver awareness and attitude. He walks 5 miles a day in Durango and said pedestrians aren’t safe there, either.

“We’ve kind of created a huge sprawling monster of a transportation system,” Demming said. “People expect, especially here, to be able to drive 100 mph. Having the state highways run through towns is a big headache for us.

“It seems because there are fewer and fewer pedestrians, people who drive forget what it’s like to be a pedestrian. I’ve had people come within a couple feet of me going 40 mph.

“I think you either have a culture that accepts pedestrians, or you don’t. The real problem is that drivers need to be educated a little bit more.”

Despite having witnessed two pedestrian-vehicle accidents – Shepherd’s, and another a decade ago, also on Main – Herrick believes downtown Cortez is far safer than it used to be. When he was a kid, he said, there were two bars across the street from each other and drunks used to stagger from one to the other, often getting hit. “Three to four times a year there would be a fatal,” he said. “It was crazy.”

He said downtown Cortez is probably no more dangerous “than you would expect it to be with the amount of traffic and the geography of the town.” Herrick is more concerned about the situation on Broadway (Highway 491), especially at Seventh, Third and Empire streets.

“Having a state highway running through town is bad,” Herrick said, “but the alternative is not having a state highway running through town, which is really bad from an economic standpoint.”

For now, the best advice experts offer those on foot is:

• Always wait for the walk light. Sometimes people think they should go because they see traffic moving in their direction, but there may be a left-turn arrow on for drivers facing you.

• Don’t jaywalk and don’t use unsignalized crosswalks. Burn a few extra calories and walk to where there’s a light.

• Look all around you before setting out. Try to make eye contact with the drivers stopped at lights.

“The pedestrian issue is a real tough one,” Demming said. “I think highway engineers are a lot to blame for making our roads less pedestrian-friendly. We’re in the business to move traffic and we’ve not looked at the pedestrian issue as well as we could. But we’re starting to look at it more.”

Published in November 2003

Dodging bullets: Cyclists seek lease on state lands

Mountain-biking or trail-running a few hundred yards from a firing range can be unnerving at first.

But enthusiasts hitting the trails at “Phil’s World,” a winding network of smooth single-track east of Cortez, have gotten used to rapid gunfire nearby.

After all, the Four Corners Rifle and Pistol Club is a few hundred vertical feet below where bikers, hikers, equestrians, motorbikers and four-wheelers pass briefly by on the mesa top.

While the booming noise is startling to first-timers, locals have grown immune, perhaps more attuned to the distinctive echo a round makes when it hits its proper target.

Still, it is awfully close, too much so for gun-club officials and land-managers responsible for monitoring the 700-acre state-owned forest, home to both the range and the multiple-use trail system.

“Twice we had to cancel an event because people — hikers or Jeepers -—were up on the cliffs observing,” said Roger Lawrence, the gun club’s president. “It’s an obvious safety issue that we had to address.”

The danger was also clear to Kit Page, the district director for state lands in southern Colorado. Such lands are quasi-public, requiring a recreation lease with the state in addition to private liability insurance for those who use them.

Otherwise, being on state trust lands is technically trespassing, but that law is rarely enforced due to its popularity.

The system opens the land to recreationists who show they can properly manage it, and prevents the state from getting sued, Page said.

In October, for safety purposes, the state land board negotiated a lease with the gun club, expanding their allotment from 13 acres to 205 acres. It extends, in roughly rectangular fashion, north and west onto the mesa, Page said, where it clips a section of trail that may have to be moved.

The expanded area is meant to act as a safety buffer for the gun club, which numbers 400 members, up from 300 one year ago, Lawrence said. He added that the extra space will also allow room for more firing ranges and events.

Meanwhile, the remaining 500 or so acres is being sought for lease by the Kokopelli Bike Club, through its non-profit parent, Greater Dolores Action.

Trail-builder and club member Scott Clow touts the 20-mile loop ride as one of the reasons Cortez is becoming known as the “mountain-bike mecca between the meccas” of Durango and Moab, Utah.

“It’s bringing in revenue here and has become a real favorite, especially because of its convenient location. You can ride it during a lunch break or after work and it stays in good shape most of the year because of the arid climate,” he said.

Clow, along with local horseback-riding and four-wheel clubs, had hoped for a shared lease, with different trails specified for a particular use to avoid conflicts and to preserve the coveted single-track conditions ideal for mountain bikes and trail-running.

The Four Corners Canyon Climbers, a strictly four-wheel Jeep club, uses some of the area for “rock-crawling,” a recent craze that involves driving Jeeps up boulder fields with the aid of elaborate suspension kits.

ATV use, which is excluded from the Canyon Climbers club, is also popular among the many two-track roads that occasionally cross, and sometimes parallel, the single track.

To help divide the uses, the state installed a fence line, with slots open at trailheads wide enough for hikers, mountain bikes, or horses, but not ATV’s or vehicles. A network of roads is available for motorized use.

But obtaining insurance for such multiple use has been difficult and prohibitively expensive, Clow said, so a non-motorized lease is being sought for a portion of the land to allow at least some legal public access.

He said the bike club could obtain a $1 million insurance deal from the International Mountain Biking Association for $200 per year. The club hopes to raise $3,000 for a five-year lease, which typically run between $1 and $3 per acre.

Page said the area has been abused and needs management by a responsible group willing to clean up and monitor the area.

For years, it has been used as a dumping ground for old appliances and tires. High-school students routinely hold litter-ridden parties there and covert, illegal tree-cutting for firewood has taken place, along with random road-building.

“It’s a mess, and that is why it has hit the radar screen,” he said.

The state land is bordered on the north by a vast area of BLM land. That area is open to all types of recreation, including ATV and four-wheeling. A road easement passes through the state land accessing those public lands.

Page said that the state will install a fence line on the west side of the road to direct motorized traffic towards the BLM lands. The work is expected to begin this year. Work on a recreation plan by the BLM for that portion is expected in the next couple of years.

State trust lands are earmarked to fund education, and could be sold for that purpose at the end of a lease.

Page manages half a million acres of trust lands within 17 counties. Mixing a gun range with biking trails is not typical with state lands, but in this case it could work, he said. Some spur trails at Phil’s World might have to be moved or eliminated for safety, but it appears through stewardship and management there is enough room for both.

Users might be forewarned, however, to hit the deck if the distinctive echo of gunfire hitting a target is replaced by the high whine of a bullet gone astray.

Published in November 2003

Deer in the headlights: Hunting, mating seasons combine to make November the worst month for animal accidents

It was like something right out of the movies.

I was driving to work late at night on Highway 160 near Hesperus when my car’s headlights, which had been lowered for an oncoming semi, suddenly illuminated a gigantic bull elk standing still as a statue stretched across my lane with his head turned directly toward me.

The elk’s image grew larger and larger, finally filling the whole windshield just as the squeal of my locked-up brakes was trumped by a loud thud and a big bang, the sounds of the impact with the magnificent beast and the pop of the inflating air bags.

Those noises were immediately followed by another loud thump as the airborne animal landed rack first on the windshield and then bounced off while I fought to get the car under control and keep it out of the semi’s path. My one forlorn thought was that I was very probably never going to see my wife again.

Then just as suddenly, it was all over. My car, front end crushed into a perfect V, had come silently to rest diagonally across both lanes. The semi driver had pulled his rig onto the shoulder and stopped just short of running into me.

Between us lay the elk, as dead and still as I had feared I would be.

Dazed yet filled with adrenaline, I managed to stagger away from the wreckage just as another car came barreling down the road, its driver narrowly missing my smoldering car and then the elk carcass by swerving onto the other shoulder. The semi driver and I managed to push my car off the road, but the dead elk was another matter – it was far too heavy to drag.

Soon a collection of helpful people gathered. One used the winch on his SUV to pull the elk out of the traffic lanes. Another called 911 on his cell phone and then asked if I needed to use it, but my hands were shaking too badly to press the tiny buttons. And another, apparently trying to calm me down, joked that now I’d already bagged my elk for that hunting season.

But nothing seemed that funny as I gradually realized that my right arm and forehead were aching badly, wounds I later learned were caused by the deploying airbags.

A few months later, in a spooky instance of déjà vu, I had another run-in with a large ungulate above Durango West. Only this time “one of those suicidal deer,” as the responding officer put it, dashed out about 10 yards in front of my car. Again the screech of locked brakes, the loud thud of impact, the big bang of inflating airbags, and the painful blow to my right arm.

The main distinction (without much of a difference) was that I was travelling the 65-mph speed limit in the first instance, and considerably slower in the second.

Still, all things considered, I’ve been lucky, for despite my rather superficial injuries and two totaled cars, I am still alive.

Others haven’t been so fortunate.

More than 200 human deaths result from about a million deer-elk/vehicle crashes annually in the U.S., according to various sources, as well as nearly 30,000 injuries, with these numbers on the rise over the past decade. The price-tags for medical costs and property damage add up to more than a billion bucks.

All across America, roadways bear mute witness to the staggering ubiquity of the problem: Those black parallel skid marks that veer in all directions, sometimes ending in a dark red blotch and sometimes running off the shoulder or into a guard rail, tell the story: These animals are all over the roads. And their crushed remains regularly lying on the roadsides, four legs sticking stiffly skyward, graphically illustrate its magnitude.

Locally, animals – mainly deer – were the No. 1 cause of accidents investigated by the Colorado State Patrol in Montezuma, La Plata and Archuleta counties during 1999, according to the CSP, and the second- and third-highest cause in Dolores and San Juan counties respectively. In 1999, such accidents in La Plata and Montezuma counties totaled 303.

But over the past 12 months, the CSP recorded more than 500 deer/vehicle crashes the same two counties, resulting in nearly 50 injuries. (But, I’m grateful to report, no deaths.)

“We kill more deer and elk with cars than with guns,” commented Jim Duresky, an agent with Farmers Insurance Group in Durango. “From what we see in this agency, we have more people hitting deer than we do hitting other cars or a tree or a rock. It’s truly unbelievable.”

He said the problem seems to be especially prevalent in Southwest Colorado.

“It’s more particular to rural areas, especially mountainous rural areas, and it’s very particular to our area,” Duresky said. “You don’t get this as much on the Eastern Plains or in downtown Denver. It seems to be more prevalent in the southwest corner of the state than even in Breckenridge or places like that.”

He said the average accident involving a deer costs $3,000 to $4,000 in damage to the vehicle. Injuries are usually minor, unless the driver swerves to miss the animal and rolls the car.

Crashes involving elk are another matter. “If you hit an elk, you total the vehicle,” Duresky said. Because the animals stand higher than deer, when they’re hit they tend to come up onto the hood and even the roof, he said.

Fortunately, drivers hit deer far more often than they do elk.

Trooper Eric Perry, who patrols in La Plata County and has covered several deer/motorcycle fatalities, said injuries in car crashes involving animals often are caused by flying glass and air bags.

“A lot of times, though, it’s from the quick stopping – (especially) if someone’s going to hit an elk,” he added. “Or after the fact when they hit the deer, they run off the road and hit something else.”

Fall is the time of year when most animal-vehicle accidents occur, with November being the most dangerous month, statistics show. Hunting and mating seasons combine to make the animals move around a lot more, Perry said.

Deer/vehicle accidents can be devastating to the humans involved, both in terms of injuries, stress and monetary costs, but they take a great toll on the animals as well.

Scott Wait, a wildlife biologist with the Colorado Division of Wildlife in Durango, said road kill is “a significant part of mortality” among the state’s deer population.

Wait cited one study that concluded 14 percent of the mortality rate among fawns was caused by accident or trauma, and nearly half of the known deaths were attributed to road kill.

Another three-year study found 13 percent of fawn mortality and 19 percent of adult female mortality was because of collisions with vehicles.

“We don’t directly know how many road kills there are,” Wait said, “but indirectly we do use it in our population modeling, because it is one of the mortality factors in all our survival studies (of deer and elk).

“It is a significant part of the mortality that does occur.”

Road kill is directly tied to the overall deer and elk populations, he explained, which declined for most of the 1990s but have increased for the past four years. Hunting plays a large role in controlling these populations, he said.

But despite the magnitude of the problem, effective methods for reducing the number of collisions involving deer and elk are surprisingly few.

Short of drastically reducing deer and elk populations – something that neither hunters nor wildlife aficionados want – the solutions range from low- to high-tech, none of them perfect.

While some methods appear somewhat effective in reducing the carnage, other commercially profitable gadgets have proven worthless, according to studies.

The so-called “deer whistle” is supposed to repel animals – deer, elk, moose and dogs – by producing certain ultrasonic pitches that cause them to flee or freeze. But, according to an article by Leonard R. Askhham written for Washington State University’s cooperative extension, the “animal-warning device” simply doesn’t do its ballyhooed job.

“The state police in Ohio, after months of testing, found no significant decrease in patrol car/deer accidents after the warning devices were installed,” he noted. “In fact, more accidents were reported by the officers after the whistles were installed than before for the same period of time and stretches of highway.” Tests done in other states have reached the same conclusion.

Duresky agreed there is little to indicate deer whistles are a help. “I don’t know whether they do any good,” he said. “People have hit deer with whistles on their vehicles and without.”

Nor have highway lighting or mirrors proven to be effective deterrents, although a reflector system that has shown promise. The reflectors are placed along both sides of a road in a staggered pattern. According to the manufacturer of Strieter-Lite reflectors, several studies have shown that close to nine out of 10 accidents can be avoided by their use in high-traffic areas.

According to the product’s literature, “Deer about to cross the road into oncoming traffic see an unnatural moving red reflection from the approaching vehicle’s headlights, bouncing off the reflectors, and are deterred from crossing.” Deer’s eyes are more sensitive than humans’; therefore, drivers are not bothered by the reflectors, according to the company.

The cost is about $8,000 per mile.

More practical is lower-cost fencing that guides deer to specific crossings, preferably over- or underpasses, and infra-red detectors that activate driver-warning signals when animals are nearby.

Deer fencing has been installed in a test project on a stretch of U.S. 550 in New Mexico south of the Colorado border.

Duresky said fencing can be very effective in channeling herds to cross at underpasses. However, with so many roads in Southwest Colorado having narrow shoulders and needing resurfacing, he said it’s sometimes hard to justify spending money for deer fences.

According to Perry, U.S. Highway 160 between Cortez and Durango and Highway 550 north of Durango are two stretches where animal-vehicle crashes are very common. But they can occur anywhere.

“Just continually scan the roadway,” he advised, “but a lot of times there’s nothing you can do, especially if they’re running.”

Duresky agreed. He advises drivers to “get behind a big truck” or travel with a group of vehicles, since the combined noise seems to deter deer somewhat from coming onto the road. However, he said, there are times when accidents are unavoidable.

“When I first moved here people would say, ‘A deer hit my car,’ and I would think that was strange,” Duresky said. “But then I was driving and there was a thump and a deer ran into the side of my car. I didn’t see it.”

Perry said twilight and dawn are particularly critical times to be careful. “Most of the time right after sunset and before sunrise is when they start to move around,” he said. Duresky said his agency sees deer strikes most commonly at sunset or an hour or so after that.

Both men advised staying within the speed limits, since the faster you’re travelling, the greater the impact.

“Most of the more severe hits tend to come on 160, where it’s paved and people are going faster,” Duresky said. “Don’t push the speed limit.”

Published in November 2003

Charges of harassment fly in Mancos

What first appeared to be a series of “hate crimes” in Mancos has proven to be a horse of quite a different color.

It began with racist and anti-gay graffiti on the River Walk benches and allegations of verbal harassment of members of the town’s gay community. It has developed into allegations of harassment and brutality against Mancos Deputy Marshal Wesley Short, who has been placed on paid administrative leave; and charges that a feud exists between town leaders and patrons of the Columbine Bar.

The graffiti, which appeared on the benches Oct. 6, is believed to have been the work of some callow youths, and unrelated to the allegations of harassment. But a closer look into those allegations has uncovered a rift in the community that runs far deeper than a few people’s bigoted feelings.

The Mancos Times recently reported that, “a feud exists between the marshal’s office and the Columbine Bar and its patrons.” Whether this is true or not is between the parties involved and their attorneys, who have been meeting to exchange information, but recent events seem to validate this belief in addition to fueling the fire.

Several of the Columbine’s regular patrons have complained of police harassment by Short both inside and out of the bar.

According to Leslie Feast of Mancos, “He (Short) comes into the bar and counts drinks that folks are drinking” and allegedly has “verbally harassed customers” while they are sitting at the bar.

Several DUI arrests have been made in town as people were driving away from the tavern, and some of the people involved in these DUIs — including Feast — have complained of use of excessive force, harassment and unlawful arrest. All of these complaints involve Short.

These events have now snowballed into several larger issues affecting much of the Mancos community: an investigation into the Mancos marshal’s office, potential lawsuits, lengthy town board meetings (including several executive sessions), a crackdown on DUIs, accusations of discrimination and the alleged harassment of Mayor Greg Rath.

The trouble began in September with several incidents involving alcohol and patrons of the Columbine. Feast was arrested on DUI charges. Three other citizens, two from Mancos and one from Cortez, all of whom had been visiting the Columbine, were arrested on different dates for charges including obstructing a peace officer and resisting arrest; DUI; and disorderly conduct, obstructing police and resisting arrest.

All have complained that Short behaved aggressively and inappropriately with them.

Several of the alleged victims said they are meeting with lawyers to discuss the possibility of suing the marshal’s office for use of excessive force, but no formal charges had been filed yet as of press time.

Feast claimed her DUI charges were later dismissed “because of the brutality issue – I was handed the dismissal papers yesterday (Oct. 23).”

She said that, on the night of her arrest, she left the Columbine to let her dog out of her truck parked outside and “next thing I knew, I was thrown up against the wire fence with a knee jabbing into my back.”

She said Short, the man who had grabbed her, hurt her back so much she cried.

The incident, she said, left her “in tears, with a f—ed-up back and the cop (Short) threatening me in the back of the car.”

The police report on the incident stated that she was “out of control, disorderly and combative.”

When asked whether she would carry through on her stated plan to sue the marshal’s office for excessive force, she said she “has not formally decided what action to take.” Her main concern, she said, is to “get rid of a person who is going to hurt somebody.”

Feast is already suing the town in small-claims court for damage allegedly done to her property during a sewer-line replacement.

This was all brought to the attention of the town board at a special meeting Oct. 16. After an executive session, the board decided to place Short on paid administrative leave until an investigation into the allegations is complete.

The Montezuma County Sheriff’s office is conducting the investigation. If there is substantial evidence against Short, it will be handed over to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, town officials said.

According to Rath, Short’s suspension is “in no way a sign of guilt. It is to take him (Short) out of the public eye so things do not escalate.”

Short declined to comment on the charges because of the ongoing investigation.

During the Oct. 22 town-board meeting, there were two executive back-to-back sessions to discuss personnel issues within the marshal’s office. Both Rath and Town Administrator Tom Glover stated later, “The record was set straight” and said they were “satisfied that the situations were cleared up, and there was no action taken against the two employees taken into executive session.”

Glover added that he was “pleased with how it went and impressed with how the board handled everything.”

Also during that meeting, the Public Safety Committee met and authorized Glover to start negotiations with Steve O’Neil, the man that the committee recently chose to fill the No. 1 town-deputy position vacated by Robert Whited.

Short fills the No. 2 deputy position, which is funded by grant monies and does not carry the same job security.

Rath, the town board and Town Marshal David Palacios said there is no plan to harass Columbine patrons, but that they are determined to crack down on drunk driving anywhere, despite complaints (particularly by those who have been arrested) that they are “getting carried away.”

“Drunk driving will not be tolerated. I have to decide what is best for this community and enforcing the law is what’s best,” the mayor said.

The marshal’s office and the town are committed to making the streets a safer place, officials emphasized.

“If (intoxicated people) ever need a ride home, I would be happy to drive them myself rather than have them attempt it,” Palacios said.

Ruben Maestas, owner of the Columbine, recently made the same offer to his patrons. When contacted by the Free Press, Maestas deferred to his attorney, who was out of town and unavailable for comment.

Many of Maestas’ regular customers claim that the crackdown against drunk driving is a form of discrimination against the Columbine and Maestas himself. One of those recently arrested told the Free Press that it is a case of homosexuals picking on heterosexuals, because several prominent Mancos leaders, including Rath, are gay and the Columbine owner is not.

However, Rath says he himself has been the subject of harassment and threats outside his home and place of business. At least five times in the past month, he said, he has been awakened in the night by anti-gay taunts and threats.

On Oct. 23, he pressed misdemeanor charges of harassment against a man who was among the four arrested in September and complaining of alleged misbehavior by Short.

Glover has contacted Colorado Attorney General Ken Salazar’s office to enlist aid. He has also discussed the matter with the governor’s office and said they were “very helpful.”

Glover said the incidents of harassment are disturbing. “He’s the mayor. I think that it’s very alarming that people have no respect for elected officials. It’s one thing to do it — another to do it on a personal level with someone that you share a community with, that you see at the gas station and the grocery store.”

Rath said he was extremely reluctant to take legal action against the man he said is harassing him, but after ignoring the harassment and having it intensify, he took the advice of many, including Palacios, and filed the charges. “This is my home, my business, my family, my livelihood. It has to stop,” Rath said.

Rath believes that the unrest in town is a result of one “last-ditch effort at lawlessness, a desire to have Mancos return to the days of the Old West.”

He added, “I encourage people who feel this way to run for town board in the April election.”

Glover summed it up this way: “We’re a civilized world, and it’s time to deal in a civilized way. There are systems in place for people to voice their complaints and be taken seriously.”

Perhaps this is too new of a concept in a town “where the West still lives.”

Published in November 2003

The wheels on the bus go round and round

While the aspens are turning various shades of red and yellow, school buses keep returning to their bus garages. As we sweep fallen leaves from our front doorsteps, bus drivers are sweeping trampled candy wrappers from beneath rows of empty seats. Autumn comes and autumn goes, but school buses are here to stay.

Many adults who have yet to come to grips with their childhoods are watching their own children file into those large, yellow conveyors of pranks and boredom with a fair amount of skepticism. How can the same things we did on those buses still be happening? The driver yells, “Everyone, sit down!” as the stop sign snaps shut and the bus heads down the road.

Recently I got to wondering about school buses because unlike the leaves, they never seem to change. The students I work with complain about their bus-riding experiences the same way I complained about mine, and it’s likely that despite the world’s leap toward the 21st century, school transportation has essentially remained at a standstill.

Stasis always reads like a dirty word. While autos and trucks have undergone dramatic style changes since the 1950s, school buses look and, what’s worse, probably feel much as they always have felt. Start with that garish shade of yellow, that hallway design, and those rows of windows that prompt even our brightest minds to fog over with complacency.

While seat belts and air bags have become an international standard for passenger safety, we have yet to enact legislation in this country that requires our bused children to buckle up.

Sticker tags, of course, have changed dramatically. RE-1, with its ever-fluctuating budget, tries to commit money to two new school buses each year, to the tune of $77,000 for each bus. This year, however, the district salvaged a better value out of a used vehicle. With a mere 50,000 miles on its engine and at practically half the cost of a showroom special, Cortez and its outlying county folks will be served by a $35,000 replacement that should help county taxpayers heave a sigh of relief.

But as that reconditioned bus pulls up to its first stop, the children boarding it will let loose their usual collective groan. You see, the experience of riding to school in a bus hasn’t evolved very much from the good old days.

Still, if you stick to statistics, the school bus is a phenomenal achievement. These vehicles nationwide log 4 billion collective miles annually, transporting roughly 10 billion students to their classrooms. Impressive numbers, I think, for perhaps America’s only genuine, viable, national-scale public transportation system. There are 450,000 school-district vehicles in this country and for over nine months out of every year, they rack up a lot of road time. Just ask anyone stuck behind one, waiting for the red lights to stop flashing. They’re everywhere.

I remember the school bus as a perfect breeding ground for small-time terrorism. Like it or not, kids pick on kids, and when I rode my bus I witnessed more than my share of taunting. On my bus, circa the 1960s, we were left almost entirely unsupervised among our peers. We were privy to a different kind of education on an island made of Naugahyde and steel, like those children from “Lord of the Flies.”

Headlines on SchoolTransportation. com suggest that in some places things are a little out of control:

“Water balloon may have caused New Durham school bus accident.”

“3-year-old left alone in sweltering school bus; driver charged.”

“Suspected vandals star in bus video.”

“Pupils hurt after gang stones bus.”

“Environmental group charges diesel fumes inside school buses…”

“New Jersey school bus contractor gets life in prison”

It would be easy to blame the drivers, but they are expected to steer a clumsy vehicle safely, watch for traffic, remember a route, memorize the names and faces of their passengers, and make sure everyone – students and traffic alike – obeys the little folding “STOP” sign. All this while trying to maintain order through a rearview mirror – a lot like watching the Super Bowl through the lens of a disposable camera.

School-bus experiences run like instant replays. How many elementary children get traumatized by accidentally stepping aboard the wrong bus, like I did over 40 years ago? If the driver doesn’t notice them or if they’re too scared to say anything, they’re in for a ride that might make Waldo squirm. Of course, as adults we hope they have sense enough to stay on the bus until the route is through, at which time the driver will hopefully be able to decipher the incoherent sobbing and take them home safely, or at least back to their point of origin – namely, their school.

A lot of this confusion could be alleviated by breaking with tradition – if we simply color-coded the elementary kids. But that would mean changing the bus color as well, and isn’t that un- American? I mean, in the case of school transportation yellow has somehow become our color for national pride. It might be nice to have a sky-blue bus to match the badges worn by the children boarding it. Or how about apple red? That’s a good school symbol. A pumpkin-orange bus might have a designated parking space beside the Panther-black one, and so much the better if it’s Halloween.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad there’s an economical solution for buying replacement buses, but what about the perennial problem of bladder control? Somehow just stepping onto a school bus signals the kidneys and because the bus is slow, it only accentuates the problem of having to go. All that jarring doesn’t help either.

Shouldn’t we consider installing toilets at the back of our new buses? We could afford to lose the last few rows of seats, because the kids who sit in the back are perfectly positioned to be troublemakers. With the introduction of toilets, the back of the bus will become the least-popular place to sit and all those devious plans will be more exposed to the driver’s scrutiny.

There’s a lot to be said for changing the way we think. It’s possible to envision an era of school-bus reformation that reaches beyond mere purchasing options, when kids will grow up to fondly remember those days of excitement on the way to school, when the driver put the bus into four-wheel drive and did that off-road thing, when the air bag “accidentally” opened and scared the crap out of the bus bully, or that time when the drop-down DVD screen wouldn’t work and everyone stared out the window all the way to school, mesmerized by the autumn leaves that look like they’ve caught on fire.

David Feela is a teacher at Montezuma- Cortez High School.

Published in David Feela

Apathy about election appalling

Oct. 9: An evening of enlightenment, or so I thought. The League of Women Voters held a forum for the schoolboard candidates. They went to a lot of trouble to provide refreshments and facilitate the meeting. The candidates came well-prepared and were truly interested in the students, curriculum, budget, and the many problems facing education in this time of drastic cutbacks.

Well, I was enlightened, but not in a happy way. So few people showed up for the forum that I can’t imagine anyone wanting to attain a board position with so little support from the parents and the public.

These elected volunteers, and there is no other way to explain this position, will spend many long and arduous hours without monetary compensation under state law, to help see that the children of Montezuma County get an education. Shame on the parents who show so little interest in the schooling of their children.

I have been to several school-board meetings, and it seems the only time the parents attend is if they have an axe to grind. There is very little positive input.

The budget these school-board members are entrusted to manage varies from $19 million to $26 million. It is amazing that we are not more interested in the people that manage the two things we hold most dear: our children and our money.

To hold these dedicated friends responsible only when things are not to our liking is shameful. The school board and teachers, as far as I’m concerned, are pillars of the community, as they are molding those that will shape our society. The board does it for free and the teachers for very meager salaries.

We look hard for the very best mechanic, builder, doctor, and cry not about the cost, but when it comes to education, we pay with excuses and complaints.

What’s the answer? Community involvement. Ideally we would get as many people to cheer the school board and teachers at the meetings and in the classrooms as turn out for the sporting events. Sports are great but we don’t produce as many Michael Jordans, John Elways and Jackie Joyners as we do businesspeople, biologists, engineers, and artists. We want to train an intelligent workforce that can aspire to be more than hamburger-flippers.

Thank you, school board and educators, for helping to do that – with very little public support.

Galen Larson owns 360 acres west of Cortez.

Published in Galen Larson

Technology addiction ruining our lives

My computer is down – possibly for good. I am writing this on my neighbor’s computer since I have forgotten how to use a pen and paper. Actually, a pencil would be more appropriate for editing, but without owning an electric pencil sharpener, what would I do if the point broke? Whiteout would be another option if that great smell didn’t distract me. So, being completely unable to function without technology, I’ve had to break into my friend’s house.

I am ashamed to admit that I have become so dependent on this machine. How many hours have I wasted stressing out about it not working and then going to the library or a friend’s to check my e-mail? Have I forgotten how to dial the phone too? Or for that matter, how about talking to someone face to face? I have actually recently been emailing someone who lives seven blocks away.

When I do get on the telephone, I’m an even bigger disgrace. My friend Kate and I have been known to sit on our respective front porches, directly across the street from each other, making observations into the receiver such as, “Oh, your new haircut looks great.” These conversations are usually in stereo due to the sound traveling as well across the street as it does over the airwaves.

What has become of the ability to function on a human level? What would we do without so much high-tech equipment? And what makes even the best of us eventually get sucked in?

Besides being a basket case, I am a Doula, a childbirth assistant. Recently, I had the privilege of attending the most incredible birth.

As labor began, Mamma was very aware of all that was around her — the monitors, the TV, the bells and whistles. The numbers on the baby monitor became such a focus that we all relied on them to tell us that she was having contractions instead of just asking her.

Suddenly, Mamma connected to something primal within herself – she became a mother wolf, who retreats to her den in solitude to have her pups. She knew exactly what her body needed and wanted her to do and when — relying on instinct rather than the machines to tell her what was happening.

There was no E.R. drama, no screaming, no homicidal threats towards her husband. It was extremely peaceful. The baby slid into this world without a fuss. It was mesmerizing. It was a sharp reminder that sometimes technology can get in the way of being human.

I certainly realize that there is a time and a place for modern technology, but I do see it being abused in all areas of our lives. Our dependence on devices has become ridiculous in many ways. My 6-year-old son will be learning how to use a computer this year in kindergarten, beginning his inability to use a pen and paper at an early age.

I did just fine without a computer all the way through college! I actually hand-wrote most of my papers and even got a few A’s! Well, one A.

What are we doing to ourselves? Look at all those people back East whose power went out; their suffering must have been unbearable. I’ve chosen to live somewhere far away from big cities and hip scenes to reduce the chances of getting caught up in the mainstream. I want to go to the market without someone on the other end of my cell phone coaching me through.

I want to raise my children with a belief in the values of not only simplicity, but certain basic skills; reading, long division, sharpening a pencil with a pocket knife, the lost art of letter-writing, physical labor, the importance of visiting, the value of face-to-face conversation, and doing things for yourself.

How can I teach them these things, if I, myself, am losing sight of them? How can my children trust their own instincts when they are constantly being shown that it is so much easier not to? Weren’t we born with instinct for a reason?

After this birth, a part of me wants to sell my house and move into a small cabin, off the grid, haul water, grow our own food, and heat with wood (or sagebrush as the case may be). I want to toss my computer, phone, cell phone, CD player – all of it. I want to return to basics and prove to my children, the world and myself that it is still possible to get through the day without it all.

Unfortunately, there’s another part of me that breaks out in a cold sweat at the idea. I have done it before, this simple cabin life, yet it seems like this dependency on technology has slowly seeped into my life over the years since, permeating my daily existence until it’s as much a part of my life as eating and breathing.

I ask, if we can do something as difficult as having a baby without machines, then why can’t I even talk to my neighbor without one?

Suzanne Strazza is a writer and mother living in Mancos.

Published in Suzanne Strazza

The hunt for cheap meat

For my money, there’s no denying that we Americans are as bloodthirsty a lot as you’ll find anywhere else on the globe, with the possible exceptions of Rwanda and Cambodia.
We’ve got a murder rate that far outshines any other developed nation, after all, and much of our alleged adult entertainment involves life-ending violence of one creative sort or another. (Hasta la vista, baby! and so on)

Apparently there remains in our chromosomes some atavistic gene that’s responsible for this blood lust, so we’re not really to blame. We just can’t help it, you know?

Look at hunters, for instance.

For the pure joy of drilling a few holes in a deer or elk, they’ll gladly spend thousands of dollars on guns, licenses, ATVs, lodging, Dinty Moore beef stew and the spiritual libations essential to any successful hunt. Add the cost of butchering and packaging, and this figures out to more bucks per pound than the choicest steak or lobster, for gamey-tasting flesh you would probably send back at a restaurant.

So obviously it isn’t the economic or culinary reasons that makes blasting some beast so appealing.

And those who defend hunting as a sport are really talking through their Day-Glo orange hats. I hunted when I was younger, and I can testify it takes very little skill or courage to draw a bead on some unsuspecting prey through a telescopic sight and drop it.

In my mind, real sport involves a contest between equals, and try as I might, I can’t imagine an unarmed herd animal standing much of a chance against someone with 20-20 eyesight and a 30-30 rifle. (Although I did see a hilarious video on “When Animals Attack” in which a deer assaults a hunter while his wife films on.)

But at least the animal stands a chance of getting away from a regular hunter, the sort that actually goes into the wild. What brought all this to mind was a TV expose I saw about the evils of hunting on private, fenced preserves, where a variety of exotic animals can be stalked and dispatched by anyone willing to pay a hefty tab.

Undercover “Dateline” cameras captured several pathetic scenes in these places, a particularly memorable one being a semi-tame Corsican ram with arrows sticking out of it cowering against a fence before it was finished off with a bullet to the head by a “guide.” (Many of these places encompass only a few hundred acres, so the idea that anyone would need a guide to get around is pretty far-fetched.)

I say, sure, slaying these penned and docile creatures is a lot like shooting fish in the proverbial barrel, but so what?

It must still be satisfying the same deep-seated craving that hunters of grizzly bears experience when they finally get a crack at some rearing, teeth-bared ursine monster deep in the Canadian woods.

So the show gave me an idea that might open the door to fulfilling this primitive urge in many more of us and, just possibly, reducing the level of violence amongst us higher sentient beings at the same time.

While it’s true that most human carnivores no longer have much taste for wild flesh, they consume great quantities of bland domesticated meat. That’s myriad tons of beef, pork, chicken, turkey, mutton, lamb, veal and so on obtained from creatures that are mostly slaughtered by machines with little human involvement.

Meanwhile, many folks obsessed with killing something are spending good money that could be used for their kids’ college education just for the chance of coming across some unfortunate creature in the woods.

Are you beginning to get my drift here?

What a tremendous waste of animal lives when each and every one of them could be providing someone with a thrill that many claim can’t be obtained any other way.

So here’s the plan: Open public shooting ranges offering a panorama of prey ranging from raging bulls to pecking pullets next to every stockyard, hog factory and chicken farm in America.

For a few modest dollars, anyone with an itch to kill a warm-blooded object could scratch it, and the businesses would earn a nice supplemental income while having to hire fewer people to process their products.

Admittedly, bringing down a long-horned steer or a Devonshire sow probably isn’t going to impress one’s friends or provide a suitable trophy for the den wall, but that good feeling will still be there.

At the same time, these sports facilities might sharply reduce human-on-human assaults, in a way similar to the theory that free access to pornography deters sex crimes by providing an alternate release for the urge.

Maybe if more of us inflict violence on so-called lower life forms, see, we’ll have less desire to harm one another.

Published in David Long, October 2003

Time to “rock on” at your local public library

Pam Smith wanted to title her new October art exhibit at the Cortez Public Library just plain “Rockers,” but she worried about attracting too many people who simply wanted to sit down.

Then she considered “Soft Rock” because the medium was fabric – narrow tapestries that reduce the full life image of rock’n’roll icons into the more humble human dimensions of roughly three-quarters scale – but she didn’t want to haphazardly associate legends like Hendrix and Springsteen with easy listening. “The Hard Rock Library” was just begging for a lawsuit, so she settled on a title that describes what the music has done in American culture since it first hit the airwaves: “Rock On.”

Artistically known as “psmith” (she claims the “p” is silent), Smith has been creating tapestry art since 1998 when her first fabric show, “Translating Traditions,” debuted at the Durango Arts Center. If Cortez locals suspect they have seen her artwork before, they’re probably right. Smith’s fabric creations have been exhibited three times at the Cortez Cultural Center and last year at the Cortez Public Library.

Her watercolors, note cards, weavings, and sculptures also adorn some of our area businesses where locals are encouraged to look, touch, buy, or even turn toward the artist when she walks in the door and call out, “Hi, Pam.”

The “Rock On” exhibit, which will hang until the end of October, completes a year of intense creative labor.

“Basically,” Smith said, “I wore out a few CDs just listening to each musician’s heartbeat while I was looking for the right way to express their personalities.”

With a distinct talent for capturing more than just the image, Smith refuses in her tapestries to try for photographic accuracy.

“By experimenting with the face and adjusting the pose, the correct person eventually emerges. All it takes is time.” Smith’s artistic vision combines portraiture with the unlikely medium of fabric, paint, dye, and literally miles of thread.

“When I can’t find the exact colors, textures, or patterns I see in my imagination,” Smith said, “I have to manufacture them myself.”

She’s known to work out the details for each piece in her head, sometimes for weeks or even months before she sits down to draw the cartoon on giant sheets of butcher paper. Then the kitchen or living room floor becomes a kind of working surface where she drapes fabrics, creating a palette only a painter could truly appreciate.

“From the moment I begin the actual piece I am obsessed with it until it’s finished,” she said. “I pin it to the wall in stages and stare at it, often for days.”

Her idea for tapestries emerged during a summer in the woods, when she was awarded a term at the Aspen Guard Station’s “Artist-In-Residence Program” sponsored by the San Juan National Forest.

Since then Smith has donated her artwork to support diverse causes, including a local land-conservancy auction, the Dolores playground project, and the “Feed the Body, Feed the Soul,” fund-raiser held in Ames, Iowa. Recently she was invited to contribute a tapestry for an international online art auction (see <thescreamonline. com>) that will collect money for ALS medical research.

Even the Cortez Public Library benefits from Smith’s show, earning 20 percent of the proceeds from the sale of each tapestry during October. The funds will be dedicated to supporting library programs for other artists. Concerned with making original art affordable to the public, Smith tries to keep her prices realistic.

“Beauty is something we hold for ransom in this culture, and that’s wrong,” she said. “If ordinary people can’t buy art without taking out a second mortgage, then the system’s screwed up.”

She believes libraries are a perfect venue for art exhibits because they are open to people from all walks of life. The idea of discovering art where a library user expected to find only information appeals to Smith’s sense of mischief.

“I love the library because you never know what you’ll find there.”

Published in October 2003

News from Towaoc: A roundup

Council election

On Oct. 10, members of the Ute Mountain tribe will go to the polls in Towaoc and vote for candidates for two tribal council seats. Councilmen Ernest House and Rudy Hammond’s terms are up. Both incumbents will seek another three-year term.

Other candidates also seeking elected office are Christine Lehi, Benjamin Pavisook, John Wing Jr., Orrin Wing, Carl Knight, Melvin Hatch, and Phillip Laner Sr. Ballots will cast at the Towaoc Dining Hall from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Tribal chair

Ute Mountain Chairman Judy Knight-Frank remains on administrative leave following federal charges handed down last year that she embezzled tribal funds, falsified tax returns and lied on bank loan applications.

According to Jeff Dorschner of the U.S attorney’s office, Knight-Frank’s case is still pending and is not on the fast track because the defendants waived their right to a speedy trial.

“Complex economic crimes like this one take time; they are very paper -ntensive,” Dorschner said.

Knight-Frank’s attorneys, John Chanin and Elisa Moran, have filed dozens of motions, some requesting that the charges be dropped. Recent requests have been to subpoena two decades worth of Ute tribal records, but it was unclear whether those motions were granted. There is so far no trial date set, officials said.

Knight-Frank’s three-year term as tribal chair is up next year. Harold Cuthair is currently acting chairman for the tribe.

Water news

Asserting its sovereignty over water quality, the Ute Mountain tribe recently adopted its own clean-water standards, the tribe’s environment department reports.

Under the Clean Water Act, tribes can assert their authority over monitoring water quality on the reservation by adopting regulations that meet or exceed the national standard. The tribe has successfully done so, reports Scott Clow, a water-quality specialist. The plan, which is pending acceptance by the federal government, allows tribal officials to monitor water sources, enforce regulations, and initiate permitting with less federal intervention. The plan will be updated every three years to keep pace with the changes in the Clean Water Act.

“This allows the tribe to control their own destiny and regulate the environment as a sovereign nation,” Clow said.

Clow said surface water quality on the reservation is good overall, but that the recent drought, fires and resulting mudslides have impaired streams and left lakes very low or empty. Navajo Wash, which runs through the middle of Towaoc, was an area of concern because of high irrigation return flows.

The Mancos River, within the Tribal Park, has suffered from silt-loading after recent heavy rains, but is recovering. First Lake, Cottonwood Wash and the Towaoc Canal were all listed as high-quality water sources, as are springs used for ceremonial purposes.

Economic growth

Weminuche Construction Authority, a tribally owned firm, is involved in numerous projects, including the controversial Animas-La Plata Project near Durango. So far the company has secured $10 million worth in initial contracts for constructing the water storage project, reports General Manager Robin Halverson. She said the first excavation and dam-building phases have been done on time and within budget.

“We have a great crew of tribal members who have been very dedicated to the project,” Halverson said, adding that much of the work force is Native American and of that there is a large Ute Mountain crew.

Weminuche has put in another bid for the building of the pumping station, which is expected to be awarded soon.

The overall price tag on the federal dam and diversion project located on the banks of the Animas River was originally estimated at $350 million but that figure has grown to $500 million. Rep. Scott McInnis, a strong supporter of A-LP, has called for an investigation to determine if any laws were broken during the initial cost-assessment process, which was done by a Chicago firm hired by the tribe.

Other ongoing projects for Weminuche are the $10.5 million, four-story Ute Mountain Hotel, adjacent to the casino, and a $1.5 million elder-care center under way across from the Sunrise Youth Center. The hotel includes a 16,000-square-foot convention center, enclosed pool, exercise room and day-care facility. It will have 90 rooms, including suites with jacuzzis.

Both projects have an expected completion date of May 2004, tribal planning officials said.

The news was compiled by Jim Mimiaga.

Published in October 2003

Home-schooling a concern as Mancos enrollment falls

A generation ago, nearly everyone went to the local school without it being a “choice.” Nowadays, parents give it much more thought, and many are deciding to home-school their children.

Since state funding for education is directly tied to enrollment numbers, this has become a critical issue in Mancos, where enrollment appears to be down for another year. Preliminary numbers indicate that the total enrollment for Re-6 on Oct. 1, the day when it is actually measured, will be between 402 and 416 students, compared to 444 last year. Elementary enrollment is up while secondary-school numbers appear to be down.

In the Mancos Valley, for those who do not send their kids to public school, the alternatives are either home-schooling or going to another district such as Cortez or Durango.

Many families who home-school do so for religious reasons, not because they have problems with the local school. Then there are those parents who always knew that they would home-school because of the perceived advantages to their children and families. Basically these people feel very confident in their decisions either way, and some are even a tad judgmental towards those who have chosen differently.

Yet there is also a contingency who question either the public school system or the Mancos School itself.

For families who have never considered sending their children to public school, religion is often a significant reason — folks wanting to blend their faith into their child’s education.

But many parents are dead set on home-schooling for reasons that are not faith-based.

Carla Borelli is one of these mothers. Her decision is founded upon her own personal experience as a child. She said she attended some of the best public schools around and that “the system failed me….children are expected to be one particular way and those who aren’t, are labeled as problems. Conformity is the key.” Borelli wants more for her daughter, Sierra.

She also expressed concern about the difficulty teachers have in full classrooms in addressing varying learning styles and dealing with children as individuals.

Connie Blanchard, Re-6 superintendent, responded that this year, workshops will be held in order to better educate teachers on working with various learning styles.

Another home-schooling mother, Charlene Swansen, seconded Borelli’s misgivings regarding learning styles and added another classroom matter, “Children tend to say and do hurtful things. Punishment is not the answer – children need to be empowered to resolve differences themselves and learn to treat each other with respect. Is this happening in public school classrooms, or any schoolrooms for that matter?”

She added that she is also concerned about the amount of television most kids watch. “It affects how they learn and interact. This is a culture that I want to avoid.”

Swansen said if these issues were addressed in a satisfactory way, she would consider sending her son, Jasper, to school in Mancos, but until then, no.

She said that, contrary to the popular image of home-schooling, she and her son do not sit at the kitchen table at home all day, but have outings and field trips, sometimes with other families. When the question of socialization is raised, her response is that Jasper “can play really well with people of all ages because he interacts with people of all ages. He’s not locked into a classroom for five hours with only kids his age.”

Other parents say they home-school simply for the joy of it, that it is a special experience and that they relish the one-on-one attention they can give.

There is probably not much that a school such as Mancos can do differently to attract families who are set on a home-school lifestyle. But what about families who hesitate to send their children to their local school because of issues specific to that institution?

Many Mancos parents say they have concerns such as classroom size, teacher-student ratio and lack of electives, in addition to sharing the same questions as home-school parents. A lot of parents think education involves more than just CSAP scores – they want children to sing, paint and play. Due to limited funding, some of these programs have been reduced if not cut entirely in public school.

But while many parents voice concerns regarding Re-6 schools, some base their objections on second-hand information, not on actual experience. One Mancos couple, Sharon and Steve King, never even considered Mancos schools as an option. This, in large part, was based on what they had heard about the schools, yet they had never set foot inside.

At the last minute, they decided that their daughter, Sera, would attend first grade. They said they have been very pleasantly surprised.

Sharon King said her decision was based on a conversation with Blanchard. “I got called on my lack of personal experience with the school and therefore felt that I had to at least give it a try.”

Not only has King tried it, but she is now running for school board. Her attitude is, “If you don’t like something, get involved, be a part of the process of change.”

Another mother, wishing to remain anonymous, has had a similar experience. She said there was “no way in hell my child is going to school here,” and for two years of preschool, he didn’t. Then this year, due to lack of options and the belief in trying something before condemning it, she sent her son to kindergarten. “He loves it. I was worried about him sitting at a desk all day, but they bake, they take long walks by the river, they have fun.”

Blanchard challenges parents to find out for themselves.“Just give us a try, and if there is something that you don’t like, bring it to me or the school board so that we can address it.”

Hearing that art is a major concern for parents, Michael Canzona, the elementary-school principal, has approached the local Artisans Co-op to try and plan ways to bring more art to the children.

But fine arts isn’t the only issue in the Mancos schools. Some children, especially as they get older, feel that their choices in all subjects are limited. Many also feel the pressure to conform; team sports are not for everyone.

Quite a few families in the valley start their kids here, then send them to other area schools as they get older and look for more variety in classes and extra-curricular activities.

Karen and David Blaine have sent two daughters to high school in Durango because they felt they had exhausted the possibilities in Mancos.

Melissa had even taken everything she could at Pueblo Community College before moving on to Durango for a greater variety, not only in English classes, but also in teachers.

Her sister, Valerie, is an artist and moved on to DHS for the expanded resources. Their younger brother, Jephry, is still at Mancos High, but is looking at customizing his own program, working with community businesses to supplement his in-school education.

This shows that just getting parents to send their children to Re-6 is not enough. Retaining them once they are here is also critical.

Asked why he thinks enrollment is such an issue, school-board candidate Tim Hunter answered, “I’d love to know why. This is a good school; I don’t understand why parents don’t want to send their kids here.”

Hunter is a “3R’s kind of guy” and feels that other subjects are a bonus.

Rodney Cox, a school-board member, said the fine-arts issue is a valid one, but not the only reason that people may avoid the Mancos schools.

He feels that, at one point, people were disenchanted with the direction that the school was going, “but now much of that is a big misconception. This is a small town and there is a horrible rumor mill – people believe what they hear.”

Cox says that one of the district’s goals is to get out in the community and find out what the specific issues are.

The board wants to increase enrollment in the next year by 5 percent, but no decision has been made as to how. They are also looking at expanding after-school and summer programs to include some of the “fun stuff.”

Cox feels strongly that people here like to complain, yet the “level of apathy from the community has been high. It’s your school.”

Whether people home-school, send their kids to Mancos or Durango or don’t even have children, what happens within the schools affects every member of the community.

The upcoming school-board election is a chance to vote for the candidates you believe will do the best job for the schools.

Published in October 2003

Dolores school district seeks OK for $3.5 million bond

With an average increase of 30 students each year since 1993, the Dolores School District Re-4A has proposed a bond issue for the November ballot in hopes of raising the funds to expand the facilities at the Central Avenue campus.

“This past year, the 2002-2003 student enrollment has increased by 24 percent and future projections and trends indicate that the district student population will continue to grow,” states the Re-4A Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan.

The aim of the bond is to raise $3.5 million to upgrade and improve the Dolores school buildings. The proposal would raise local property taxes by 6.675 mills.

If your residential property had a market value of $100,000, your annual tax would increase by $53.14. Commercial properties with a market value of $100,000 would see their annual property taxes increase by $193.59 under the proposal.

The master plan includes an expansion and renovation of the Science/ VoAg Building. The science building is now over 30 years old and needs an upgrade to address health and safety issues. The bond would finance the improvement of four science labs and two math and science classrooms.The upgrade would also provide two additional classrooms in the middle school.

The construction of additional locker rooms is also in the master plan. Currently, because of space limitations, the high-school and middle-school students share one locker room. More than 400 students share this space, which was originally built for half that number of students.

Health and safety have become issues under these conditions. The school administrators would like to have separate facilities for the middle-school and high-school students for discipline and management purposes. The new locker rooms would be attached to the auxiliary gym and include dressing areas, rest rooms, and showers.

The construction of three additional high-school classrooms is also slated as part of the bond-funded improvements. At present three temporary modular classrooms have been added to the campus. The school district would like to eventually replace these with permanent additions to the school building.

These three pieces – an upgrade of the science facilities, the construction of an additional locker room, and three high-school classrooms – could be completed if Bond Issue 3A passes.

The district is also seeking monies from its capital reserves and applying for state and federal capital-construction grants to build additional elementary-school classrooms, renovate the elementary school, renovate the football field, and build a preschool classroom.

Tina Goar, Dolores superintendent, is offering tours of the facility to any interested party to explain what is being planned.

Published in October 2003

Detox never sleeps: A look at the world of the Durango Detox

Editor’s note: The incidents described in this story are true, but identifying features have been changed to protect clients’ privacy.

Although its heavy wooden door is always locked, the Durango detox never closes.

Any time, any day, including Sundays and holidays, clients reel, lurch, stagger or even walk with great dignity through its entrance once the magic key has been inserted in the lock.

They cover the spectrum of humanity – the young and old, the healthy and sickly, the light-skinned and dark-skinned, college students and high-school dropouts, the belligerent and bellicose, the humiliated and humbled. But above all, the intoxicated.

DPD Edwards here with a 45 YO Cauc male; BAC .273; no hold, DUI charge; 2 previous detox episodes; client cooperative but angry at police and wife because “she let me drive”; abrasions on left cheek and forearm, which he reports were sustained in a fall; does not admit ETOH problem; pulse slightly elevated, other vitals WNR; hygiene poor (apparently urinated on himself); client to begin safe detox.

So begins a typical progress note in the file of a new arrival. Translated, it means a Durango police officer brought in a 45-year Caucasian man with a blood-alcohol content of .273, or nearly three times the threshold for a DUI; that he’s been treated at the detox twice before, but denies he has any problem with alcohol; and that his vital signs are within normal range.

“I’m not that drunk – I don’t care what that goddamn machine says. Give me back my shoes — I just want to go home. You’re as bad as those goddamn cops! I want to phone my lawyer. I need a cigarette. Come on, man, I’m hungry, I haven’t had anything to eat in two days. I can’t wait till breakfast.”

Those are typical reactions of a new arrival, who has his (or her) alcohol level measured and shoes, belt and all personal possessions taken away before the intake interview can proceed. The detox counselor seeks some personal information – income, drinking habits, drug use. In this case, the man answers reluctantly and with anger. He keeps mentioning that he is hungry. But it’s 4 a.m., and the detox kitchen, such as it is, closed at 7 p.m. He’s missed his chance at a TV dinner or cup of soup.

Welcome to Detox, the world of sobering-up drunks and druggies, where the usual ticket for admission is a blood-alcohol content of more than .040, although the more regular clients, referred to as frequent flyers, often are admitted with alcohol levels that could be lethal to the novice drinker.

A few clients arrive without alcohol in their systems, but hallucinating on speed or sick from heroin withdrawal. Those are usually sent to detox from Mercy Medical Center’s emergency room, depressed and despondent, occasionally to the point of what’s referred to as “suicidal ideation.”

Such clients are accepted on an “emergency commitment” until they are sober and can be evaluated by a professional from Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center, which operates the detoxification unit.

A nearly infinite variety of people are profiled in the long rows of cabinets contained in a locked file room – except, of course, those records of drunkards and drug addicts and abusers are strictly confidential.

“No one will ever know you’ve been here unless you want them to,” clients are reassured during the intake. “We’re prohibited by federal law from releasing any information concerning your stay here without your written permission.”

Most arrive in handcuffs, escorted by police who have nabbed them driving drunk or engaging in a variety of petty crimes – from vandalism to theft to public indecency (often urinating in public) – or who just have concerns for their safety.

Usually they are given a choice of coming to detox with minor or no charges, or going to jail, which requires a charge, booking, mugshot, fingerprinting and bonding out.

Some clients, called self-admits, enter detox voluntarily, convinced, temporarily, at least, that the time to end their substance abuse has come

The new arrival isn’t one of them. He’s indignant at being in detox and expects to be treated like a respected guest. Intake interview finished, he is taken to a bed to sleep, but before long he’s up again, pounding on the property cabinet in the hallway. He’s told that if he doesn’t settle down, he could end up in jail after all.

“I’m paying $225 a day to be here and I deserve to eat when I want!” he shouts. “Food or jail!” The detox counselor points out that he arrived well after dinner time, to which he sarcastically replies, “What am I supposed to do – say to myself, ‘It’s time for dinner at detox – I’d better get up there?’”

Aside from the basic intake information, clients are also asked to answer numerous questions contained in a 16-page file that includes a drinking and drug history (If you used any of the following substances, how old were you when you first used them and when did you last use them? Alcohol, speed, cocaine, opiates, etc.), as well as a recent personal history (How many days out of the last 30 did you drink alcohol? Any hospitalization in the past six months?), and a financial agreement. A stay at detox costs a maximum of $225 a day, it is explained, although for Colorado residents of modest means the fee may be adjusted to as little as $45.

Once sober, clients are also asked to fill out a four-page infectious-disease screen, which determines their risk of having tuberculosis, HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases. Those who are at medium or high risk are referred to the county health department or other medical clinic for testing.

Because the 45-year-old man won’t quiet down, the police are called. They tell him that if he doesn’t behave, he’ll be taken to jail, where breakfast won’t be served any earlier than at detox and most likely will be similar fare – cold cereal, milk and juice. He subsides and goes into a Quiet Room – a simply furnished cubicle where the most agitated clients can be isolated. Everyone breathes a sight of relief.

On the average, about 100 clients a month receive services at detox, with more being brought in on weekends and holidays, usually for periods of a day or less. A few, however, decide it’s time to do something about their problems and elect to stay and complete a “five-day packet,” which involves finishing a lengthy written self-assessment, viewing treatment videos and attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, while awaiting placement in a residential treatment program.

These clients must usually wait for a bed to open up at St. Mary’s in Grand Junction, which receives funds from the Alcohol and Drug Division of the state health department. It is the only option for people on the Western Slope who can’t afford to pay a hefty tab for private treatment and the wait can be a matter of weeks.

The chance to change

Law-enforcement agencies that use the service as an alternative to jail include the Durango, Southern Ute, Ignacio and Fort Lewis police departments, as well as the La Plata County Sheriff’s Office, with each paying a portion of detox’s nearly half-million dollar budget through an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). The Colorado State Patrol and the Bayfield Marshal’s office occasionally bring people to the detox as well.

The state also provides some financial support, according to Deborah Karn, substance-abuse services program coordinator for SWCMHC, but that funding has suffered from large cuts in the state’s budget for social services, so the local communities pay most of the cost.

Nearly $300,000 comes from the various entities through the IGA to help detox provide services, with almost $200,000 coming from the state, she explained.

“Other detoxes that have not had that kind of community support have been in much greater jeopardy of closing,” she said. “This kind of care is expensive to provide, and it’s neat that our community stepped up to the plate.

“Our mission is to provide both community safety and safety for the intoxicant,” said Karn, who has supervised the unit for more than two years. “We also offer the opportunity for people’s lives to change (and) we’ve seen it over time – some people do get better.”

Sobering up can be physically risky for alcoholics, she added. “Alcohol withdrawal is one of the most dangerous withdrawals there is.”

The effects of withdrawal can include seizures, delirium tremors (uncontrollable shakes accompanied by hallucinations), unstable blood pressure and pulse, sleeplessness, severe headaches and nausea, all of which can be controlled with drugs such as Haldol and Librium.

Choosing to be sick

The relief is short-lived. As soon as the man goes into the Quiet Room, he begins pounding on the door. “Give me my clothes!” he shouts. “I’m going to jail, dammit!” The cops roll their eyes at each other, then handcuff him and take him away.

Detox isn’t primarily about changing people’s behavior, regardless of how destructive it obviously is, Karn said.

“I respect an individual’s choice to be sick or to be well. Being well is a value judgment, a bias,” she said, “and while I would certainly advocate for people to make healthier choices, I can respect it when some people say, ‘No, I’m going to stay sick.’ Sometimes we’re more of a hospice than anything – we watch people slowly killing themselves.

“The bottom line is this is a free country, and I’d like to see it stay that way.”

Detox counselors, who have basic first aid and CPR training, measure blood pressure, pulse and respiration rates during the intake interview, and at least three times daily thereafter. If a client’s vital signs are unstable – abnormally high or low blood pressure or heart rate – Mercy’s ER staff is consulted, and that usually means a trip to the hospital for a check-up. Or if an adult client’s BAC is above .400 (.100 is the threshold for a DUI charge), or if a juvenile’s is above .300, medical clearance is necessary before intake. Karn makes it graphically clear when hiring new staff members that as well as dealing with often unruly and hostile clients, they will occasionally be cleaning up vomit, urine and feces.

“I think it is a very humble and very noble profession that we do,” Karn says. “I think we are of service in a way that is not glorified, but very important.

“For the one-time or first-time detox person, what their detox counselor says to them sticks out more in their mind than what half of the treatment counselors will say to them after that,” she said. “They’ll remember that one face in the morning when they woke up or that one thing the counselor told them – it’s powerful, it’s a big deal.”

‘I fell for it’

Detox counselor Megan McCullouch, a recent Fort Lewis College graduate with a well-rounded liberal-arts education who has worked at the facility for close to a year, remains enthusiastic about her job, though it’s hard for her to explain why. She works the graveyard shift – 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the period when many of the most intoxicated clients arrive, and is considering a career in law enforcement.

“I just like it,” she said. “I like the excitement, the action, but I like working with the people who come in here that are obviously having some serious life issues – most of them, not all of them — and I like the people I work with.”

The rewards of the job are personal, she said.

“At the end of my day I feel better about myself, like I’ve done the community a service, and I feel like, maybe, I’ve helped out some people out who couldn’t have helped themselves.”

But the job has its disappointments, such as clients who seem very serious about seeking long-term treatment, only to fall off the wagon within days, or hours, of their discharge. McCullouch recalls one for whom she had particularly high hopes that supposedly left to go to long-term treatment, but stopped at the nearest liquor store instead.

“That was the first time (at detox) I’d seen anyone making an effort toward making a positive change in their life, and then when it turned out it was almost a sham, it was that much more disappointing.”

Still, she hopes he really wanted to turn his life around.

“I hope that’s true, because if at some level he believes that, then he’s sincere. I’d like to believe that rather than think he just lied to us the whole time, because if so, then I’m a sucker. I fell for it.”

It’s another Saturday night in Durango. At detox a lone chronic client who has been there for two days and hinted he was considering treatment is now anxious to leave. He is still thinking about treatment, he says while signing the discharge forms, but is crazy for a cigarette.

Still, he’s concerned about whether his girlfriend will take him back because she has given him “several” last chances.

“This may be it,” he says, now sober in more ways than one.

Just then the buzzer at the front door sounds twice, despite the posted sign that reads, “Ring the buzzer ONCE and staff will open the door.”

The sad nightly parade of alcoholics’ antics and anger that accompanies their slow march toward sobriety or death begins anew.

Detox never closes.

Published in October 2003

Archaeologists unearthing treasures at A-LP site

Nearly everything involving Animas-La Plata is controversial.

Even though the now-$500 million project to construct an off-stream reservoir for water siphoned from the Animas River is under construction after decades of debate, its supporters and foes still argue its merits as bitterly as ever.

But in the center of the controversy – literally – archaeologists are working serenely, untouched by the swirling arguments. They are taking advantage of a rare opportunity to conduct a large-scale excavation of Ancestral Puebloan sites southeast of Durango before those sites are submerged beneath 120,000 acre-feet of water.

And they’re making discoveries that have them intrigued, puzzled, and – as is always the way with archaeologists – seeking more information.

Some unusual structures on a hill are of particular interest, said Jim Potter of SWCA Environmental Consultants, the archaeological firm hired by the Ute Mountain Utes, who are constructing A-LP. He is the lead archaeologist for the four-year study being conducted on the area that will be affected by the project.

“We found some really interesting architecture that we didn’t expect up on Sacred Ridge,” overlooking Ridges Basin, the site to be filled by the reservoir, he said.

One of the structures might be a tower because the posts are considerably overbuilt for the size of the structure, he said. Near the tower is a round structure with two rows of upright slabs surrounding it and no posts – a round, walled, open structure.

“It’s weird,” he said. “It might be a gathering area, a community center. We’re finding architecture up here that you don’t find in any other site. It’s really unique.”

This is the second season archaeologists have been in the field at Ridges Basin and nearby Blue Mesa, working in the warmer months and moving indoors to their labs in October. They have two more years to do field work and then three to complete reports and analyses.

The Ridges Basin area had been surveyed several times in the past, and some excavations had been done, but nothing on the scale of the effort now. While the goal is not to excavate everything, archaeologists want to recover crucial artifacts and obtain crucial data that will enable them to answer key questions about the early inhabitants of the area.

One of those questions is what sort of societies lived there and how they were organized.

“We’re finding that the architectural remains are a lot more variable then we anticipated,” Potter said, “leading us to think it’s not as cohesive a group that occupied the basin as had been thought.”

The remains of a large village sit in the middle of the basin, surrounded by loosely scattered houses. Potter said it’s unclear what the relationship was between the village and the small house clusters, or even whether they were all occupied at the same time

The Ancestral Puebloans lived in Ridges Basin a relatively short time, from approximately 750 to 850 A.D., during what archaeologists call the Basketmaker III to Pueblo I periods, Potter said. “We didn’t know how dependent they were for food on domesticated plants such as corn, but we are finding evidence that they were heaviliy dependent,” he said.

They lived in pit houses, structures dug 6 feet into the earth and covered by roofs made from beams and brush.

Then they left, possibly moving to the southeast or northwest. The reasons for their leaving – whether environmental or because of social conflict – are another question to be answered.

They left behind a treasure trove of artifacts ranging from tools made of animal bones to redware pottery, unusual for this region of the Southwest, Potter said. Most of the ceramics have been grayware, but crews this fall found a whole redware jar on Sacred Ridge, buried in a pit. “We don’t know whether it was made locally or imported,” he said.

Potter’s favorite find was a well-preserved set of beads strung on a still-intact cord made from plant material. “I’ve never seen anything like that before,” he said. Numerous grinding tools, flaked stone tools, potsherds and projectile points have also been discovered.

The artifacts will be stored in the Anasazi Heritage Center near Dolores, which also holds the artifacts unearthed during the building of the Dolores Project, which created McPhee Reservoir. Human remains will be repatriated, along with any associated artifacts, at an undisclosed location in consultation with Native American tribes.

Dating the sites will be critical to analyzing the sequence and manner in which they were occupied. Gary Ethridge, crew chief for one of the several crews of six who did the excavating, said the roofs beams recovered should be able to be analyzed easily using tree-ring dating, or dendrochronology.

“We have some nice carbonized beams we can get dates from,” Ethridge said. “The dendrochronological time line is very important to archaeologists. We can see when the structure burned to the year.

“The Southwest is unique in that it’s such a dry climate that lends itself to preserving things and we have the type of forests and trees that lend themselves well to this type of dating,” he said. “We’re going to be able to date this very well.”

The study covers an area roughly 1.5 by 2 miles, Potter said, containing approximately 260 sites. By comparison, the Dolores Project involved about 1,000 sites. Nevertheless, the Ridges Basin excavations will provide archaeologists fodder for discussion for years to come.

“This is a really exciting project, very large,” Potter said.

Published in October 2003

Insurance companies offer nothing tangible

I was in a poker game once with a bunch of hard cases but holding my own when a royal flush showed up in my hand. I bet heavily and exposed my hand to rake in the pot.

“Whoa!” said this huge guy and he laid down 4-8-10-Jack and a 2. I said, “What’s that?” He said, “A gobbledygook. It beats anything.”

I let it go and it wasn’t long before I had a 4-8-10-Jack and 2 in my hand.

I cried, “Pot’s mine! I have a gobbledy-gook!”

He said, “Sorry, only one per game.”

That situation reminds me of the way insurance companies are always changing the rules on us. Insurance seems to be the only corporation that produces no tangible product. What do we receive when we make our purchase? Usually a folder in different comforting hues containing many paragraphs of gobbledy- gook put together by lawyers that have spent years researching ways not to let any of the money you paid in become accessible to you.

The companies shamelessly use our money to lobby for laws that make dealing with them compulsory, as in the case of automobile insurance. If you don’t buy it, you break the law.

Now, they have persuaded our legislators to pass a law – lobbied for by them – that took away our no-fault automobile insurance and replaced it with something called “tort.” That means that, if we are injured in an automobile wreck, we may have to employ an attorney to get our medical costs paid. Nowhere in my policy — home, health or auto — can I find any reference stating that I may have to go to a court of law to collect what is rightfully mine.

I at one time was convinced by an insurance broker to be an agent. I realize now that I must have come across as a devious person. I was given books, charts and educational brochures to instruct and train me in that deception.

After two weeks of study and a myriad of questions, my friend told me my standards would not allow me to be a qualified salesperson. I found that on life insurance the percentages were manipulated in favor of the insurance companies. They used scare tactics to persuade people to increase their insurance.

In this I have first-hand knowledge in the settlement of a claim. They wanted to cancel me even with them owing me money. Another person might have knuckled under, thereby losing the money owed him. I was told to believe that when a claim was settled I was taking money from other clients. They never mentioned the million-dollar salaries and stock options paid the CEOs. Nor did they bring to my attention the losses incurred by dabbling in the stock market or overloading the erection of high-end buildings with low-rent returns.

Now, don’t blame your agent. He is doing his best to provide you a service in case of a catastrophe and has only limited knowledge given to him by his company. He has children to send to college, house and car payments, and insurance of his own to buy. It’s the board, CEOs and inhouse lawyers that lobby our elected officials (very few of whom are informed as to the workings of this pyramid scheme) that are to blame. Most anything one purchases outside of insurance can be returned if you don’t use it and you can receive the full amount of the purchase price.

Not so with insurance. Even though you never had a claim, if you choose to return it, a portion is subtracted from the initial payment. Kind of a crap game – you bet on the seven and get crap, and they keep the money.

Now they want four more aces in the deck – not for us, but for them. Because of the drought we are told that we have to cut our trees around our homes. Trees may be an integral part of the decor of the home site, to say nothing about shade, but if one fails to do this they can cancel the policy.

How convenient – we pay in good faith, taking the risk that they could go out of business, but when they’re drawing to an inside straight they want to change the rules.

My wife and I had supposedly the best health insurance we could buy and were paying into it for 50 years, with the premiums always increasing. Several times the company was swallowed up by a larger one. We also paid in the small required amount to Medicare and Medicaid for a much shorter time.

When my wife had a stroke, that Medicare to which we paid the least had to pay the most, and the high-end company with its many promises only paid 80 percent of the 20 percent that Medicare did not pay. Sometimes they paid nothing because we didn’t use the total of the deductible.

I was under the impression that pyramid schemes were unlawful. Well, lo and behold, the insurance companies of America are perpetrating that scheme on us.

Galen Larson lives on 360 acres he has donated to the Wildland Trust west of Cortez.

Published in Galen Larson

Paranoia: Into your life it will creep

Yesterday morning, my upstairs neighbor confessed that he’d stolen a magazine out of our public library. “I don’t like to read it in the lobby,” he said, “so I just take it out on Saturday evening and return it Monday morning.”

I could understand that, I said — I don’t like reading in the uncomfortable library chairs either — but the next thing he told me gave me pause. He “borrows” books too.

“I don’t check out books now,” he said, glancing at me out of the corner of his eye. “You know, because of the Patriot Act the government can check on what you’re reading.”
I nodded, thinking of my mother-in-law, who only tips in cash so that the IRS doesn’t have a record of what waitresses are making above and beyond minimum wage.

I also know many people who won’t give out their Social Security number to anyone but their employers. There are a number of good reasons to guard your Social Security number (identity theft, for one), but the reason they cite is they don’t think the government should be tracking what they eat, or what doctor they see, or what bank they frequent.

I generally agree with this, so when I fill out my grocery form card I normally give a fake identity. I do this more because I don’t want a grocery chain to track my eating habits than because I fear the government will be worried I’m eating Wheaties and put it in my FBI file.

It’s not that I underestimate the government. I grew up in a household that believed a good citizen voted, tracked legislation, knew the evils of communism, and viewed government with a suspicious eye. I know that the Patriot Act is an infringement on our civil liberties and yet, I don’t feel particularly courageous writing that last sentence because I’m still free to write it. And now I can just hear a chorus of people reading this saying, ‘That’s what you think.”

Conspiracy theories abound these days. Several people have recently proposed to me that the CIA or FBI knew what was going to happen on Sept. 11, 2001, and simply did nothing to stop it so that our country would eventually be able to take over Iraqi oil fields. My neighbor said, “You really think it was possible for the hijackers to take over the plane with only box cutters?” as if I was stupid for not reading between the lines.

Despite the fact that, yes, I do think it would be easy to take over a plane without government aid, my neighbor is not alone in his beliefs. I recently read the results of a survey that reported 20 percent of Germans believed the U.S. government was behind Sept. 11. Twenty percent!

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, and I’m not inherently paranoid of the government because I’ve worked in government and have met many people there who care very deeply about what they are doing. I also believe that, as one friend put it, you shouldn’t attribute to malice what could be explained by gross incompetence. Our government cannot even manage to kill its biggest enemies: Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Should I really be worried that it could get it together enough to track every book in every library?

Some people thrive on fear of the government and believe the government is personally targeting them and their children and it’s only a matter of time before they show up in black helicopters to take all of their guns away. In fact, I think they would like nothing more than that to happen just to prove to the rest of us that their fears, and their fight, are legitimate.

And I sigh, every time I think about people who gather documents in their garage to prove a conspiracy theory, because I think it is wasted energy. I fear that no one cares that our children can’t read, write, or do arithmetic. I fear the apathetic adult who doesn’t vote. I fear that we drive by the homeless man with an obvious mental illness because we are afraid of him, instead of reaching out to help. I fear the alcohol and drug abuse that damages so many families. I don’t fear the government. I fear humanity.

Janelle Holden, a former resident of Montezuma County, writes from Montana.

Published in janelle holden, October 2003

Pledging ‘something’ to the flag

“I pledge something to the flag of the United States of America, and to the something for which it stands,” is how I remember reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in the one-room schoolhouse I attended many years ago. “One nation, under God, something, with something and something for all.”

Or at least that’s how my second-grade mind, ignorant of concepts like “allegiance,” “republic,” and “indivisible,” interpreted this curious mantra we chanted each morning in unison with our one-eyed teacher.

The Pledge meant nothing to me other than being what we did before our music period, which could last anywhere from 10 to 30 minutes, depending on Mr. Norris’s mood. So it was like an exercise to warm up the old vocal chords for singing loud, off-key verses of “Billy Boy” (the teacher’s first name was Billy), “Sweet Betsy from Pike” and other rousing selections from a red-, white- and blue-covered songbook entitled “America Sings!”

It’s been, therefore, with some amusement I’ve read recent news stories about Colorado school kids being required by law (or not) to recite the Pledge each morning, presumably to instill in them that nebulous substance “patriotism,” which Samuel Johnson correctly observed is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Which gets me nicely around to speaking of scoundrels: It seems our pathetic legislators, terribly eager to show how terribly patriotic they are in the wake of the 9-11 attacks and the subsequent waging of the unending War on Terrorism, passed a law earlier this year mandating that all the state’s public-school teachers make their charges parrot them in a daily recitation of the pledge. Never mind that the Supreme Court decided in 1943 that “compelled speech” is unconstitutional. (Our own representative, Mark Larson, initially spoke against this foolishness, but ultimately voted for an amended version.)

Under the law, currently placed on hold by a federal judge until the General Assembly tries to correct its unconstitutionality next year, Colorado kids must slavishly drone their loyalty to Old Glory each morning to kick off their bitter dose of public education, unless their parents give them permission not to because such a blanket promise of fealty goes against their religion or politics.

In those cases, the exempted kids get to stand in silence (and stand out like major zits) while the students who are not Communists, atheistic bastards or Muslim terrorists show them what being “good Americans” is all about.

Forced speech, it’s called by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing teachers and students who challenged the law.

“Are they going to make kids say the pledge unless they get a note from their parents?” a Denver Post story quoted Colorado ACLU legal director Mark Silverstein asking. (In other words, are the students going to be taught that they themselves don’t have the freedom not to speak?)

Although most parents interviewed had no problem with their kids being turned into automatons, the Post reporter managed to dredge up a couple who didn’t like this brand of “patriotism” being imprinted on their offspring.

“Part of living in the United States is that you are not forced to say something that is not part of your beliefs,” said one mother.

“They‘re being taught to worship the flag, and I don’t think that blind worship of anything is good whether it’s a flag, the cross or a swastika,” said another.

Still, as contemptible and silly as the law is, I doubt permanent harm will result should it eventually survive the legal morass it has already created.

Because just like the young me, some of the students interviewed obviously had no idea what they were saying anyway. One thought “indivisible” meant “wisdom,” while another thought it meant “people aren’t visible.” Just like me, in their minds they are actually saying, “I pledge something… to something… with something… for all.”

But don’t get me wrong. I have no problem with those of us who can actually grasp its meaning declaring allegiance to our national symbol. I do it myself twice a month.
Of course, my idea of loyalty to country doesn’t involve unqualified support of draft-dodging politicians and their self-serving agendas, such as engaging in foreign adventures to protect the vested interests of their rich buddies. (Let’s see, Bush and Cheney are oilmen, and we just sacrificed a lot of young lives and billions of tax dollars to take over some Iraqi oil fields… hmmm…)

My pledge means working to get rid of such corrupt, duplicitous leaders and replace them with folks who actually adhere to the principles of democracy: equality, fairness, freedom — “liberty and justice for all.”

Now that we’ve got that straight, anyone care to join me for a lively rendition of “Oh, Susannah”?

Published in David Long, September 2003

Monumental fund-raising push pays off

Two imaginary lines form a cross in the hilly, scrubby desert of the Southwest. The land is covered with sagebrush, cacti and tumbleweed, and populated mainly by lizards, rattlesnakes, coyotes and scorpions, yet tourists by the hundreds of thousands flock there annually to have their pictures taken in contorted positions reminiscent of the ’70s game “Twister.”

So what’s the deal here?

It’s the Four Corners Monument, that’s what, a site owing its uniqueness and drawing power to the fact that it’s the only place in America where four states meet. The land is owned by the Navajo Nation in Utah, Arizona and New Mexico and by the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe in Colorado.

Many years ago, the site was marked by only a stick surrounded by rocks.

The monument has been upgraded since then, but remains undeniably shabby. For $3 per person, tourists can patronize the Native American vendors hawking jewelry, sand paintings, and other traditional wares from plywood stands surrounding a concrete disc embedded in blacktop. There is no running water, and the only toilets are Porta-Potties.

But now that a final hurdle has been cleared, the attraction just off U.S. Highway 160 is scheduled to get a $4.5 million facelift (or, more accurately, a complete body reconstruction) under a plan that requires state has been a decade in the making but has been bitterly opposed by a local legislator.

Mike Beasley, director of the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, announced Aug. 22 that DOLA will provide a portion of the funding needed to secure $2.25 million in federal monies to pay for far-reaching improvements. The federal money would no longer have been available after September.

To receive the funding, each of the Four Corners states was supposed to pony up $500,000. Colorado was the last holdout.

Under the agreement, DOLA will kick in $200,000 and the Utes, who had already committed to paying $200,000, will have to come up with another $100,000.

The state money was in jeopardy after state Rep. Mark Larson, R-Cortez, withdrew his support from the project in June, charging that “predatory” business practices by the Utes and concerns about tax issues had caused him to change his mind.

Larson said he did not think the state should “contribute taxes to an entity that contributes no taxes to the state.”

However, the state funding was supported by a number of local leaders who believe a revamped monument would be a boon to tourism.

In a last-ditch effort to save the project, Beasley was invited to meet with tribal and local leaders and see the monument for himself. He toured the site on Aug. 19.

“From the meeting the other day, we managed to secure $200,000, which matches the tribe‚s contribution,” Beasley said in a phone interview Aug. 22. “They were ecstatic about the $200,000 and I encouraged them not to ask me for any more.”

For years the monument, operated by the Navajo Nation, suffered from a lack of funding and care. Torturously hot in the summer and bleak in the winter, it was haunted by hungry dogs and offered few amenities for visitors. The site was spruced up and rebuilt after a fire destroyed the old, ramshackle vendor booths, but many local officials believed major improvements were still needed.

“Ten years ago the state of Arizona came to the tribes and said, ‘There’s a problem (at the monument) — it’s not being well-received by the visitors’, “ Ute Mountain Ute planning director Troy Ralstin said at the Aug. 19 meeting with Beasley.

The Arizona highway department asked the tribes to address “the appalling conditions” at the monument, Ralstin said, and since then that state has already invested $500,000 in the design phase of a plan that was developed with the help of the Four Corners Heritage Council, a group established to promote heritage tourism in the four states.

In 1999 Congress authorized $2 million in federal funding to refurbish the monument, with the condition that each of the four states contribute $500,000 as well. Congress also provided $50,000 a year over five years for initial operations.

Arizona and Utah swiftly agreed, but New Mexico’s then-Gov. Gary Johnson twice vetoed legislation providing for that state’s share. The New Mexico measure was passed and signed by Gov. Bill Richardson soon after his election last fall.

That left only Colorado, which delayed doing anything until last spring. Then the legislature worked out a funding scheme under which the state’s share would be provided through the severance-tax fund controlled by DOLA.

However, DOLA’s funding was temporarily frozen until July 1, the start of the fiscal year, because of the state budget crisis. After that, the expenditure had to be re-authorized.

At that point, Larson, who says his support for the project was only lukewarm, switched his stance. He argued that the monument improvements would benefit only the tribes, and since the Utes pay no state sales taxes, they should contribute Colorado’s share.

Larson also said he was angered by marketing tactics used by Ute Mountain businesses that he believe unfairly take business away from Cortez merchants. Larson said such practices include giving free meals to truckers at the casino’s restaurant and free casino chips to tourists staying at the RV park.

“I consider that predatory,” said Larson, who once owned the M&M Truck Stop south of Cortez but sold it last year to his brother-in-law. “How are Cortez businesses supposed to compete?”

He also argued that the tribe pays almost no state taxes, with the exception of taxes on fuel.

“The tribe does not now nor have they ever collected sales tax on non-Native American sales,” he wrote in a “one-last-effort” plea to Gov. Bill Owens the day after Beasley’s announcement. “The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled several times that the states have a right to collect this tax. . . .”

Larson also noted that the tribal casino operations do not, under the law, contribute to the Contiguous Counties Trust Fund, as do casinos in Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek, and that the Utes do not pay county property taxes.

“The tribe is a sovereign nation that is routinely touting that sovereignty when the state or local government wants cooperation on mutually beneficial issues or attempts to hold tribal government…accountable,” he also wrote.

But Christine Arbogast, a lobbyist for the Utes, rejects those arguments.

“Mark’s position has boggled my mind,” she said. “He views it that the only beneficiary is going to be the tribes. To me it’s completely logical that a $4 million facility down there has got to help the entire area.”

She said the tribe’s practices are “not unlike any other business that uses marketing tools to make their business more successful.”

“What are they supposed to do? Go back to the old days and sit in poverty?” she asked.

And, though the tribe does not pay certain taxes, tribal members regularly shop in Cortez and pay local and state taxes there, she pointed out.

Ute Mountain Tribal Councillor Manuel Heart agreed, commenting that the tribe is the largest employer in Montezuma County, with more than 1,000 persons on its payroll. He added that the tribe does pay severance taxes on oil and gas development.

Obviously pleased by Beasley’s decision, Heart took the opportunity to give Larson a dig.

“We of the Ute Mountain Ute tribe really appreciate the state of Colorado stepping up,” he said, “and I’d really like to thank Sen. (Jim) Isgar and our — make sure you write this —our representative, Ray Rose.” Formerly a part of Larson’s 59th District, the tribe’s lands were made a part of Rose’s district, the 58th, during the last reapportionment.

“We’re pretty positive that we can come up with the other $100,000 before the deadline, Sept. 30,” Heart said.

The Utes and Navajos, who are each contributing a hundred acres to the site, will operate it jointly.

Heart said as soon as a joint management agreement is signed, the National Park Service will release the federal funds to the Four Corners Heritage Council, which will act as the project’s banker. He said the project will be put out for bid once the money is in place.

Water, electricity, and sewer service will be provided by the Navajo Nation through Arizona.

The disc that marks the joining of the Four Corners will be sunk into the center of an amphitheater remote from the vending area with four tree-lined paths leading to it. Handicapped-accessible ramps will go to the four-state juncture.

The redesigned site will include trees, picnic areas, permanent vendor booths, and an interpretive center celebrating Native American culture.

Heart said the interpretive center will help educate visitors about the tribes and the area.

“We have foreigners going to the monument thinking there’s Indians living in teepees.”

Published in September 2003

High home prices, low wages collide in Mancos

Thinking of settling down in Mancos and buying your first home? Good luck. It’s not easy and it’s not cheap.

Ask a realtor, town employee or resident about “affordable housing” in Mancos and the response is a chuckle. Those two words don’t go together here.

According to quarterly reports for the months from April to June of 2003, houses in town are selling for anywhere from $80,000 to $250,000, with the average selling price falling at $111,000.

To folks in areas such as La Plata County, this may not seem like much. But according to the most recent census, the average family income in Mancos is $22,000 and at least 50 percent of the population falls into the low-income bracket. People cannot afford a $100,000 house on $22,000 a year.

Housing prices outside the town limits are even more dismal. From Summit Ridge to Weber Canyon, houses are selling for averages of $213,000 and $240,000 respectively.

Looking at some of the traditional less-expensive options uncovers other obstacles.

One option is a trailer or manufactured home. If you can even get one financed, unless it was grandfathered into your lot, town codes forbid putting either of these onto a lot. Although modular homes have come a long way over the years, they still don’t pass muster here.

They are built to HUD code but are not up to the Uniform Building Code, which is mandatory for town lots that are zoned Single Family Residence. Manufactured homes can be brought up to code with a little work and approximately $17,000, but that defeats the advantage of buying one.

Why are things so skewed? According to Ed Morlan, executive director of Region 9 Economic Development District, it’s largely supply and demand.

“With more and more ‘urban refugees’ moving to the valley, the demand for more housing and more development rises,” Morlan said.

“But supply is limited due to the amount of public lands, the physical landscape limitations and an infrastructure that cannot sustain much more growth.”

One of the main limitations is water. Mancos, like the rest of the county, is stretched to capacity in terms of providing water for its residents, farms, parks and businesses, so a place with water on it is a hot commodity.

Who is buying the expensive real estate in Mancos? “It is hard to say,” commented Bruce Johnson, economic development specialist for Mesa Verde Country. “We don’t have any significant developments to question the demographics.”

Back in the ’80s, there was a push to attract retirees to the area. Now a group wants to revive this effort.

But many Mancos residents have concerns. They wonder whether those people will become a part of the community. Will they vote in school-board elections, create local jobs, and spend their money in town? Often, though not always, the answer is no.

Retirees are not the only ones moving in and driving up home prices. Many people are escaping from someplace larger and faster-paced. Many of these folks work as consultants or commute to jobs, again increasing the demand for housing, yet not supplying more economic stimulation.

Much of this is speculation, said Johnson. “One reason people pick this area is to be remote or to travel a lot, so you don’t become aware of who these people are.”

Johnson claimed he finds it “hard to accept that it’s too expensive to live here” given that the average house in Durango sells for $280,000. Maybe that’s why so many people want to relocate here, but that doesn’t solve the affordable-housing problem.

A few homes are being offered through a sweat-equity program, wherein homeowners help build their homes in exchange for a lower-priced house. There are also rentals in Overlook Village, where rent is set according to income.

But work needs to continue, officials say.

Mayor Greg Rath said, “The future of the town and the school is young people and their families moving in. If the housing market is out of line with the economic market, then we need to work together to fix the problem.”


Published in September 2003

Gravel-pit foes win big battle

Citing procedural errors and a lack of due process, a Colorado court has ruled that public hearings that led to the approval of a controversial gravel mine in the Dolores River Valley were invalid.

Denver District Judge William D. Robbins ruled Aug. 15 that the Colorado Mined Land and Reclamation board erred in its handling of two hearings regarding the Line Camp mine proposal, one that was held in Dolores and another in Denver.

The Line Camp mine is located six miles upriver from Dolores. It has been operating on a county high-impact permit along with a MLRB permit under a five-year plan that is now being re-examined.

In his ruling, Robbins admonished state mining officials for not recording the pre-hearing conference in Dolores when they should have; for illegally dismissing key issues opponents had a right to formally present; and for unfairly preventing cross-examination of expert witnesses for the mining industry at the final hearing in front of the MLRB board, which, he added, approved the mine “after no deliberation.”

Also, the mine’s permit applicant and operator, Four States Aggregate, submitted a revised application to the Division of Minerals and Geology after the first one was deemed incomplete, but no new notice was published in the newspaper as required by law, according to the ruling.

These infractions violate the laws laid out in the Administrative Procedures Act, Robbins wrote in his decision, and therefore the meetings must by reconducted properly by Minerals and Geology and the MLRB. The state agencies are responsible for issuing and monitoring reclamation permits required for mining minerals.

The whistleblower lawsuit was filed by Marilyn Boynton of the group Save the Dolores, along with gravel-mine neighbors John Akin and Carol Stepe.

They opposed the mine based on health and safety issues, flood dangers and property de-valuation for neighbors.

“I think it’s great, terrific,” remarked Boynton upon hearing the news for the first time when contacted by the Free Press. “It shows those state agencies that they cannot operate in the dark, that the public is watching. The whole process is rigged in favor of mining.”

Rocky history

The contentious issue symbolizes the need to balance land-development rights and gravel needs with protecting riparian environments and quality of life for residents and tourists. During negotiations in 2001, opponents argued that increased dust, truck traffic, visual blight and flood dangers from the project would damage the scenic valley, property values and tourism.

They lobbied hard for the MLRB and county planners to deny the mining permit based on the impact of another large gravel operation in a river corridor where there are already a half-dozen within a few miles.

“They told us the cumulative impacts of so many in one area would not be considered, but that was the larger picture —there are definite limits on what a watershed can safely handle,” said Pat Kantor of Citizens for Accountability and Responsibility, a Dolores-based environmental group.

But proponents pointed out the need for high-grade gravel. The material, found primarily in river beds, is ideal for making the cement used to build homes, public projects and roads.

“If we did not do this here then it would have to be done somewhere else,” said Val Truelson, who leases his Line Camp property to Four States Aggregate for mining.

“What people do not want to think about is what the environmental damage of gravel-mining would be if it was forced to occur more on public lands like the San Juan River.”

Cease and desist?

While lawyers for the MLRB and Four States consider an appeal, the status of the mine is in limbo. Mining operations were clearly ongoing at the site as of Aug. 25. But Robbins did not specifically issue a cease-and-desist order.

However, under the law a permit is not possible without the public hearing process, which Robbins found was not valid.

“The MLRB permit is essentially on hold because the court found it was not properly issued,” said Ken Lane, a spokesman for the Colorado Attorney General’s office, which represents the MLRB.

But when asked if the mining should therefore cease, he responded, “I do not know; it was not part of the ruling. We are still interpreting the judge’s decision and are considering an appeal.”

At the county level however, no state permit means no county permit, confirmed Montezuma Commission Chair Kent Lindsay.

“It was contingent on all other permits being in place so, yes, I think they have to stop mining because that was part of the deal,” Lindsay said, adding that the next phase of mining should be on hold until the hearings and state-permitting process were completed.

Truelson said mining was finished for the time being, and that only hauling was taking place at the site.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer, Jim Preston, said if mining were to begin again it would be grounds for an injunction to stop it until the permit is approved. He argued that the case cannot be appealed because it was not a final order.

The original lawsuit requested that the mine’s approval be overturned due to health and safety dangers.

“But the judge said he is not even going to try to decide that yet because the constitutional rights of objectors were violated during the hearing process,” Preston said.

Calls to Four States Aggregate’s owner, Aryol Brumley, were not returned. His attorney, Kelly McCabe, would say only that progress has been made with the suit and that a settlement was near.

Precedent-setting

If it survives appeal attempts, the decision sets a statewide precedent on how such projects will be decided in the future.

Robbins re-interpreted the Administrative Procedures Act in the decision, significantly changing the procedural status of the pre-hearing conference. He ruled that since major decisions and orders were made by public officials in the case, such as refusing to hear key issues of opponents, then such hearings are “adjudicatory” or judicial in nature. By law, he ruled, they therefore must be recorded.

“What it means is that the pre-hearing conference can now be legally appealed in court because it was ruled adjudicatory,” Boynton said. “(The pre-hearing conference) must be recorded and that’s important to protect your rights as a citizen trying to participate in these government hearings.”

Bruce Humphries, a minerals specialist with the Division of Minerals and Geology, said the agency has been working to adjust the way meetings are conducted because of previous lawsuits, and will do so again because of this one.

In fact, the MLRB is considering a new system that better accommodates public concerns in the hopes of avoiding lawsuits, he explained.

“But it is all pending on what action the MLRB decides to do in this case,” he said.

Humphries did not disagree that the process favors the mining industry.

“Our statutes state that we shall not deny‚ gravel mines that meet the minimal requirements, and this one did, so it was granted a reclamation permit,” he said, adding that most are approved, but a few have been denied over the years.

He emphasized that state statutes for reclamation permits do not deal with land-planning issues. “That is for the county level, and the mine was granted approval there, so it then went to the state process,” Humphries said.

Opponents object to that interpretation of the statute and the court has agreed. Such issues must be recognized by the MLRB board and cannot be dismissed at the pre-conference hearing, the judge ruled.

“They tried to throw them out, but now they must be heard and that is important because this project has a lot of dangerous problems regarding flood safety,” Boynton said.

Following several contentious meetings in 2000 and 2001, the mine was granted a high-impact permit unanimously by the county commissioners, who cited private-property rights.

But a mitigation plan addressing public concerns was implemented by the county to reinforce and add to MLRB rules. Hours of operation were restricted, a deceleration lane was installed for truck traffic and a committee was formed to oversee the mining reclamation.

In addition, water-quality monitoring was required, a five-year limit was set on the operation and reclamation ponds were ordered to be rounded so they will be more aesthetically pleasing.

Also, largely because of pressure from Boynton and opponents, the controversy spurred the county to participate in the remapping of the Dolores Valley floodplain to ensure accuracy and address potential safety hazards.

The mapping will be conducted under supervision of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Last summer, FEMA officials expressed concerns about the number of mines and earth berms in the river corridor and their potential impacts on flooding. It is this information that objectors want to more fully present at the final MLRB hearing.

“I’m looking forward to presenting the facts,” said Boynton, a geologist. “Their (MLRB’s) witness had it wrong.”

The right of citizens to argue against government was reaffirmed, Preston said.

“I think this shows that when a community comes together they can overcome abuses by state and local governments, by going to a court and finding justice there,” Preston said. “This is corporate welfare for the gravel industry, — they get the state’s attorneys and witnesses to do their work for them, and I think the judge saw that abuse of using state resources to fight the grassroots citizenry.”

Boynton, who received a $3,000 grant from the Patagonia corporation to help pay for the fight, is cautiously hopeful.

“I accomplished what I set out to do,” she said.

“I spent two years hollering, writing and organizing after I saw how dangerous the situation was. Now there will be some changes in the way these things are handled in Colorado, but I won‚t get my hopes up too much.”

Officials say the new hearings will be within three months, assuming there is no appeal. If the MLRB re-approves the mine, Robbins said, he will make a final determination on its legality.

Published in September 2003

Canyons of the Ancients: The future of a fragile land

Once upon a time, the arid public land in western Montezuma County was largely the province of cattle, collared lizards, and carbon-dioxide producers. Archaeologists, some long-time residents and a few pot-hunters knew of the area’s many Ancestral Puebloan ruins, but tourists rarely visited them.

And while there was an occasional push to make the area into an Anasazi National Park or something similar, nothing came of those efforts.

That all changed on June 9, 2000, when President Bill Clinton, at the urging of Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, designated 164,000 acres in Montezuma and lower Dolores counties as Canyons of the Ancients National Monument.

The move had been vigorously resisted by many locals, who saw it as a governmental effort to end many traditional uses of the land and believed it would actually result in more damage to the ruins by calling attention to the area.

More than three years later, many continue to oppose the monument designation.

Weathered billboard-sized signs defiantly declaring “No National Monument” still stand around the county, although some wags have suggested they’re a little like saying “No Drought.”

On the other hand, many locals believe the designation has brought benefits such as increased funding and better protection of resources, and that the monument can be a boon.

Some folks such as Glenna Harris fear the worst from the monument, but hope for the best.

Harris, a former school teacher and longtime rancher in Yellow Jacket, owns land both adjoining the monument and lying within it, something she said is “really scary” because of concerns that the government will someday curtail grazing permits or buy up inholdings.

She said the fact that the monument is managed by the Bureau of Land Management rather than the National Park Service is a good thing. The monument’s proclamation allows continued grazing on existing leases, but Harris isn’t completely reassured.

“We’ve had no problems thus far, but of course they haven’t really promoted it (the monument) yet,” she said. “Some day people may wander in and see a cowpie next to a ruin and think it’s a cardinal sin and the BLM will say, ‘You have to remove your cows’.”

Jackie Wallace of Mancos, a rancher who owns tracts in McElmo Canyon lying within or next to the monument, likewise is worried about what will happen to her grazing rights in the long term. Already, she said, the BLM has told her the grazing permit she holds in Rock Canyon will be canceled after she dies rather than passed on to anyone else.

The BLM has started the lengthy process of developing a new management plan for the area, something that causes Wallace further worry. An 11-member citizens’ advisory committee was selected in June to help develop the plan.

“We’re concerned with it (the planning),” Wallace said. “I’m afraid we won’t be able to do anything on our own land out there.”

The monument designation does nothing to protect ruins, she asserted.

“All they did by making this a monument is holler at people and say, ‘We got something here none of you know about, better check it out!’”

A huge headache

That’s a sentiment echoed by many. “In my opinion it has invited additional people into the area and it’s getting more traffic than it would have if we hadn’t ballyhooed it,” said Dale Slavens of Cortez, a longtime member of the Four Corners Trail Club, a which advocates responsible off-road-vehicle and snowmobile use.

There’s no doubt visitation has increased. Fifteen years ago, Sand Canyon, a trail beginning in McElmo Canyon, saw only a few hundred visitors annually, but today approximately 17,000 users flock there each year. Hikers, pet dogs, mountain-bikers and horseback riders jostle on the trails or carve new ones across fragile crytobiotic soil. Potsherds have largely disappeared, and some long-time observers say the number of small animals such as lizards is down.

Overall, the monument gets some 45,000 visitors annually, according to automated trail counters at sites such as Sand Canyon and the Painted Hand Ruin near Hovenweep National Monument.

Owners such as Wallace and Harris who have lands near the monument worry about trespassers, litter and property damage. Wallace said off-highway-vehicle users have cut her fence near Battle Rock and driven across her land to get to public land. The problem existed before the monument, she said, but is worse now because the BLM has blocked some unofficial routes the four-wheelers used previously.

Hunters and other visitors drop trash on her property, too, she said.

Harris said acquaintances who lived near Sand Canyon told her about hikers leaving “one mess after another,” particularly before there were portable toilets at the site. She said the more people who visit the monument, the more damage there likely will be to the fragile landscape as well as ancient ruins and artifacts.

“Before, a lot of people didn’t know it was there,” she said. Of one particular seldom-visited canyon with well-preserved ruins, she said, “It’s neat now, but when 1400 people go trampling through it, we’ll see what’s left.”

But others argue that the increase in visitation would have happened without the monument proclamation.

“Sand Canyon was well on its way to becoming a huge headache before anyone mentioned the monument,” said Mark Pearson, executive director of the San Juan Citizens Alliance, a Durango-based environmental nonprofit.

He believes the monument is a plus because of the extra funds it will bring. “To deal with the crush of people coming to Colorado and the Southwest, you have to have resources, and the monument was a way to get those,” he said.

“I think Bruce Babbitt probably had a good long-term vision, and 20 or 50 years from now people will look back and say, ‘He helped protect one of the greatest archaeological treasures in North America’.”

Extra funding

Monument Manager LouAnn Jacobson agrees the extra funding has been a plus.

“The area has certainly gotten more attention within the Bureau of Land Management,” she said. “As a result, we have gotten some more money — never as much as we want, of course.” The funds enabled the BLM to hire additional personnel, including a second law-enforcement ranger, and to replace a roof over a kiva at Lowry Ruin, the only developed site on the monument.

The designation also helped Canyons of the Ancients nab a $60,500 grant from the state historical fund to replace an ugly chain-link fence at Cannonball Ruin and backfill parts of the site that were left exposed after an excavation in the early 1900s, Jacobson explained.

She said the monument’s new fame has helped bring in funds for other projects such as an inventory of roads and trails on the monument; a land-health assessment done in 2000; a study of riparian zones; and a 10,000-acre inventory of cultural sites and their condition. A survey by the nonprofit Colorado Natural Heritage Program is under way to collect data on reptiles as well.

She said most of the grazing allotments were rested on the monument this year, but that was because of the drought, not any intention on the BLM’s part to take away grazing rights.

Jacobson said there has been an increase in incidents of vandalism and pot-hunting over the past two years, but it is probably attributable to better reporting rather than a sudden surge in visitors.

“There may be a couple of places where signs were damaged that the vandalism is an expression of anti-monument sentiment,” she said, “but otherwise I don’t see it (the illegal activity) as directly tied to the monument (status).”

And while damage is occurring in the area, more groups are volunteering to help counter problems. A site-stewardship program has been created by the BLM and Four Corners Heritage Council to train volunteers to watch over cultural sites and report abuses.

A couple of years ago, Chuck McAfee of Lewis started an informal group called Friends of the Monument to “try to blunt the continuing cacophony of noise that said how bad the monument was.” Members spent a day last summer digging thistles in a burned area.

Also, the Four Corners Trail Club continues its longtime practice of regularly picking up trash along popular vehicle routes, with help from the Mesa Verde Backcountry Horsemen.

Jacobson believes that managing recreation and grazing will be the biggest challenges facing the advisory committee and the monument as a whole. But not everyone agrees.

Sensing hostility

Pearson of the San Juan Citizens Alliance said he is more concerned about the impacts of oil and gas extraction. Canyons of the Ancients contains one of the nation’s largest producing carbon-dioxide fields, as well as some oil and natural-gas deposits.

Controversy erupted in the summer of 2002 over proposed seismic exploration for oil and gas on a remote part of the monument. The SJCA and three other groups obtained a temporary injunction that halted the testing until certain concerns were addressed. Pearson said he is disappointed by the reclamation done by Western Geophysical after the exploration.

“There are vast parallel tracks criss-crossing the desert” left by the giant wheels of the seismic trucks, Pearson said. He said he also found the reclamation of four old CO2 wells by Kinder-Morgan, the carbon-dioxide-extraction company, to be inadequate.

Jacobson, however, said all those sites were damaged by drought. Spring rains followed by a blistering summer caused plants to sprout, then wither, after re-seeding, she said.

Mark Varien, a member of the monument-planning advisory committee and director of research at Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, believes concern about the seismic exploration was based largely on misconceptions.

“You saw editorials all over the country that implied those cultural resources were going to be pillaged, not protected,” he said. “I felt that really misstated the reality.”

The seismic testing was done under supervision by archaeologists to make sure that ancient sites were avoided, he noted. “There are laws that dictate the activities that have to be done to protect cultural resources when oil and gas development occur, and it seems in most cases those companies play by those rules.”

Varien said he has noted one unfortunate effect of the monument’s creation. “As a researcher I would say it has alienated people who live adjacent to the monument, and their willingness to cooperate with archaeologists has diminished.”

In the mid-1990s, he said, Crow Canyon mapped numerous archaeological sites and received “close to 100 percent” cooperation from private landowners.

A similar project was conducted over the past two summers, he said, and many landowners not only refused permission to visit sites on their land but denied access across their land to public sites.

“I’ve hiked out there since I came here in 1979, and gates that were never locked have locks now,” he said. “The biggest effect I’ve noticed is the hostility of some landowners.”

Miscelle Allison of Pleasant View understands that hostility. She is firmly convinced the monument designation was not only a mistake, it was illegal.

Time to move on?

“Using the Antiquities Act to create Canyons of the Ancients was a gross abuse,” she said.

The 1906 Antiquities Act states, in part, “That the President of the United States is hereby authorized… to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government… to be national monuments, and may reserve as a part thereof parcels of land, the limits of which in all cases shall be confined to the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects.”

“Do you think 164,000 acres is the smallest area possible?” Allison asked.

She said the designation was “just a control thing” pushed by “cubicle freaks with a one-size-fits-all mentality.”

Allison said she would like to see the monument return to its previous, lower-profile status as an Area of Critical Environmental Concern. That would reassure locals that multiple use will continue, she said.

But others say it’s time to accept the monument and move forward. “It’s here and we want to make it the best possible thing for the community,” said Varien. “I’m looking forward to being part of the advisory committee.”

McAfee said Canyons of the Ancients will help protect not only the cultural resources within it, but the natural landscape and wildlife as well.

“I can’t see why the establishment of the monument is harmful,” he said.

County Commissioner Kelly Wilson said the designation was a mistake but that it’s a moot point now. “We have a monument whether people like it or not. We have to fix it so we can live with it.”

Published in September 2003

Referendum A will suck the Western slope dry

Here I go sticking my nose into something a number of people will tell me I know nothing about — water — and they may be right.

B u t this I do know : O n e lives under the rule of three minutes without air, three days without water and 30 days without food. And if we don’t have water, we don’t have food.

It’s astonishing to me that, while such a strong message is being sent to us via nature, more people are not upset that the Front Range is coming after Western Slope water. Isn’t it interesting that Xcel Energy, Safeway, Hensel Phelps Construction, Vail Resorts, Phelps-Tointon Inc. (a holding company in Greeley) and California-based Shea Homes are donating large amounts of money in support of Referendum A, to be voted on in November?

With all this money coming in and the support of Governor Owens, guess who’s going to win? Oh, they’re only going to take the surplus that goes to California and Nevada and Arizona. Guess what’s to happen when we taxpayers pay for the Big Straw — the Front Range will have more votes and more water. We the Western Slope will become the new Owens Valley, like the agricultural community in California sucked dry in the late 1800s and early 1900s by chicanery, conning, and intimidation by Los Angeles politicians.

In the 1800s John Wesley Powell stated that the West doesn’t have the water to sustain a large population. The book “Cadillac Desert” by Marc Reisner confirms that, as does a book written in 1958, “The Geography of Man,” by Preston E. James. It offers a detailed history of world deserts and, like it or not, we are a desert.

For selfish politicians to build an economy on endless growth shows an ignorance of the problem or a wanton disregard for future generations. We in the 21st Century are so accustomed to getting our food from the supermarket we forget that it has to be raised or grown somewhere.

Water controls growth. With an excess of one comes a shortage of the other. To base an economy on growth is not only foolish but disastrous. Agriculture, on the other hand, can be sustained with limited growth, limited water and viable crops for export and local consumption.

The heritage left for second generations by their forefathers has almost been squandered for the quick buck of development. With modern technology and less effort this area can remain profitable and a viable agricultural area. But if the Western Slope water goes to the Front Range we will become a wasteland not fit for man, nor beast, nor development.

I challenge all Western Slope officials to come up with alternatives to help the economy, other than a prison or Wal-Mart or growth. For the rest of us, best keep our eyes wide open as to Referendum A. To give the governor — who gave us these state budget problems — the right to regulate our water would be ludicrous.

Published in Galen Larson

The carnival rolls into California

When I worked in Washington, D.C., staffers called Capitol Hill “Hollywood for ugly people.” With C-Span, CNN, and all the Sunday talk shows trained on them, politicians certainly have the opportunity to attain celebrity status, especially if there is anything at all interesting about their sex lives.

Some politicians have even become Hollywood celebrities in their own right. U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson has starred in numerous movies, and most recently he played the part of New York City’s district attorney in the last television season of “Law and Order.””

No one seems to object when a politician becomes an actor because it’s obvious they have to have acting talents in order to get the job. But when actors try to become politicians it’s questionable whether they can pull it off, or whether they should pull it off.

Some of you may think Ronald Reagan was the best thing that ever happened to this country. Personally, I think Reagan’s greatest achievement was that he proved it is possible to run a country without a memory. No, I’m talking about Jerry Springer running for Senate in Ohio, or Sean Penn taking it upon himself to investigate for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or Arnold Scharzenegger running for governor of California.

In fact, California’s gubernatorial recall election has been hard to ignore. Not only is it major news, but it’s like the movie “Titanic” – even though we know the boat is going to go down in the end and everyone is going to drown, we want to watch it happen. With nearly 200 candidates on the ballot, and a governor who is becoming more of a tragic figure each day, the drama is worthy of Shakespeare. Many commentators have likened the race to the popular reality-TV show, “American Idol.”

But though I see their point, I prefer the circus/carnival comparison. Just look at the candidates. You have a strong man (Arnold), a bearded lady (Arianna Huffington), a midget (Gary Coleman), a clown (comedian Gallagher), and of course, the man inviting you in for a peep show (Larry Flynt). Only California could attract so many freaks to one election.

However, what bothers me most about celebrity candidates is that few have ever held office or performed an act one might consider a public service. I’m not supporting the idea that only career politicians are suited to the job, rather, I’m disappointed that the majority of political candidates in this race considered running for governor before running for school board.

Unless significant campaign-finance reform is passed, I have no doubt there will always be a ready supply of rich, inexperienced, ego-driven candidates for top offices.

Unfortunately, it’s not just California that is having this problem, I’m ashamed to say. Montana’s current governor, Judy Martz, has an approval rating in the 20th percentile and has wisely decided to “spend more time with her family” instead of running for reelection. However, the top Democratic candidate’s only qualifications for the job are 1.) He ran for U.S. Senate in Montana three years ago and lost 2.) He is a farmer 3.) He bused senior citizens to Canada to get cheap prescription drugs to make a political point.

Personally, he could promise me the moon and more and I wouldn’t vote for him. Why? Because he has never held an office in his local community – not even dog-catcher. Those citizens who agree to sit through tediously long meetings for little or no pay are true public servants, not someone who suddenly decides, out of the blue, that he might make a good governor.

This is why I would like to see states reconsider their election laws for recall elections and add a requirement that candidates must have participated in a community-service project or been elected locally before they can run for governor.

Yes, the founders of our country would probably roll over in their graves at the idea, but in a recall election like California’s, an added requirement could have saved the state an expensive circus. Truly, it would have been a public service to us all.

Janelle Holden is a former resident of Montezuma County.

Published in janelle holden, September 2003