Notes from a disaster: Part 2

PC411-on-line-ad-for-Navajo-Language-articleAnimas closureCommentary by Janneli F. Miller

Aug 7/8
midnight
I can’t sleep. the spill haunts me. I close my eyes only to see that hideous orange-yellow river in my brain imagery. I am obsessed with knowing all that I can, & so much is unknown
You’re the EPA and you don’t realize that if you dump a bunch of toxic sludge in the water it will dissolve & go downstream? Incomprehensible, but this is the response as to why it took them 24 hours to notify the public
I go to the public information meeting at the La Plata County Offices. There is no place to park, the bike racks are full & there are huddles of people crowding the 4 entrances to the room, which is filled – people stand along the walls, sit on the floor – I manage to creep through and get a spot in the floor
They are showing photos of the spill – the gaping mine hole, the snaking orange-yellow ribbon of polluted water, the sludge on the shore & the meeting is live-streaming – websites, radio, the ski area, many businesses in town playing it live for their concerned employees.
First, representatives from the EPA who have flown in from Denver will speak & then they will take questions. Shaun McGrath and David Ostrander provide apologies and explanations. Quotes from their presentations hit local state and national news within minutes.
Video cameras run, children, gray-hairs and plenty of young folks listen anxiously, but everyone is polite as the folks from the EPA do their best to be “forthcoming.”
You read about environmental disasters all the time, but I’ve never had one 2 blocks away from where I live before.  There’s a surreal sense that life as usual can’t go on, but it does – except the river is an ugly opaque mustard and no one is near; instead, people peek over bridges. Dog days of August and no rafting no kayaks no tunes no swimming… A general anxious tone permeates the city.
The first question from the audience is, “What’s in the water?” since lab results are in. “Heavy metals” and they move to the next question, but the audience stirs and mumbles: WHAT heavy metals, exactly? Cadmium, lead, copper, arsenic, aluminum, calcium & no results for mercury & supposedly no cyanide.
The second questioner asks what the EPA is doing to help and protect tribal residents. We learn they are working with the Southern Utes and the Navajo tribes but interestingly this doesn’t end up in any of the mainstream news articles.
Libby Faulk, the PR lady from the EPA, calmly points to members of the audience with raised hands and counts us off.  Why didn’t you know this would happen? What precautionary measures did you take? Who owns the mine & what are they doing? (Privately owned; nothing.) Was the mine operational & will it be? (No, we don’t know what the owner is going to do.) Do you have enough funds for the clean-up?  (yes) Where can the public get information? (on the web and we will have daily briefings). Was your hazard analysis made public for this clean-up? (No) How long will the river be closed? (We don’t know.) What about New Mexico? wonders the mayor of Farmington . What about the water supply and the wells? asks a restaurant owner. What’s in the sludge? What is your plan for the future? On and on, the reporters scribble, people shift in their seats, look worried.
The kingfishers are also haunting me, as well as that family of mergansers I saw on rocks in the murky water.  I raise my hand to ask about the wildlife – all those critters that can’t just stay out of the water? The audience erupts in applause and I am floored.  There is no answer: we don’t know. You tell us – only 1 of the 106 caged hatchery trout died in the first 12 hours.
The other question to get a round of applause is from a young fellow who asks why it took 24 hours to notify the public. Again- “we didn’t realize the serious nature of the incident for those downstream.”
After the meeting, a woman in tears comes up to thank me because she was too upset to ask that question herself. Several people in the crowd give me a thumbs-up. A reporter wants my phone #. I’m quoted in the Durango Herald…
My friend at Mtn Studies Institute has been sampling the water constantly – a baseline before the plume arrived and then every half-hour for the first 2 hours it was here, from 8 p.m. until 12:30 a.m. They need money for testing, their photo shows up on the San Juan Citizens Alliance web page. Actually, SJCA has given the only reasonable response as to what we can do. Educate ourselves, show up, contact your elected officials, demand accountability, speak your mind…
5 p.m.
The water is a sickening color. People still stop on the bridges to snap pictures. The social media are on fire. People hate the EPA. Some people can’t imagine such stupidity; others explain the complexities.  The story has hit the national news & the photo of thethree3 kayakers on the yellow river is on Huffington Post, Newsweek, the AP wire.  Just another environmental disaster – and then it’s on to Trump, the debate, Jon Stewart’s last show…
The narrow-gauge chugs along, the tourists waving and snapping their photos too.
It’s been raining all afternoon and somehow this feels right. Yeah, let that rain pour, let it drizzle softly for hours – can the rain clean this mess up? At least it soothes the soul.
But I still can’t sleep – I hate that color. I’ve seen rivers flush red, brown, white, gray-blue with run-off from the soils upriver. I’ve seen rivers green and light blue and chocolate, but orange?  it’s not right.
The editor of EPIC magazine is sponsoring a healing ceremony for the Animas – 1:30 at the dog park, underneath the Smelter Mtn. Manhattan Project site that needed clean up from uranium-milling. But that was 50 years ago…  Ironies abound.

Aug 8

6:30 a.m.
On the way to the river with the dogs I encounter a doe. What will the “heavy metals” do to her?  The riverbank is covered in deer tracks. The water this morning is darker & clearer – looks like the orange is sinking to the bottom & the river actually looks like it could be water… They said the “plume” is 8 miles long and going 4-5 mph. Thank goodness for rain.
Geese fly south overhead.
I’m leaving town, leaving the state, in a couple of hours. What will the river be like when I return?

Janneli F. Miller is a Free Press contributor. She teaches environmental studies at Fort Lewis College in Durango.

 

Published in August 2015 Tagged , ,

Notes from an environmental disaster: The Animas River contamination

Animas flowing Animas, 7 a.m. Friday, 33rd St.By Janneli F. Miller

Thursday afternoon, Aug. 6

4 p.m.

I’m just above the 33rd St put-in in Animas City. The Gold King Mine clean-up near Silverton has gone awry & at 10:30 a.m. Wednesday, a toxic sludge of mining wastes was released into Cement Creek. It passed through Silverton & hit the Animas & the river is bright orange. A helicopter is flying about overhead – moves upriver, turns around, hovers – whack whack whack. More traffic than normal passes by on the dead-end residential lane: bicycles, motorbikes, trucks, police cars patrolling. The sheriff ordered everyone off the river about 30 minutes ago, and is now making sure we don’t gather on this private road so the residents don’t complain. There are various reports as to where the “plume” is and how fast it is moving. It was at the Iron Horse about an hour ago…

 

6 p.m.

Residents are mulling about the empty put-in. A patrol car blocks the road and the uniformed men amble through the crowd providing as much information as they can. Photos from the helicopter show up on the Albuquerque news. People in Durango weren’t advised until 24 hours after the spill. Anxious residents line the river, stand on bridges – Where is it? Not here yet.

I get a text from a colleague – we’re professors of Environmental Studies at Ft. Lewis. “Are you at the river?” she asks. “Yes – not here yet…” “We’re downstream taking samples – let us know when you see anything.”

A pair of women wander by, one on her phone: “we’re giving up; we have waited a long time & are on our way home- Not here yet & no one knows when it will get here- It’s going real slow through the oxbows.”

 

7:30 p.m.

We think we’ve seen the river orange but can’t tell – was it the sunset? The orange smoke clouding the sky from the Sleeping Ute fire distorts our view, plus it’s sunset… Riverside at the banks a small crowd peers into the dusky river. One of my FLC environmental studies students is there. “I had to come see it.” The water is looking cloudy. Ooooh it IS changing, isn’t it?

Thursday, Aug. 6

 

8:30 p.m.

32nd St bridge, N. Durango

A huddle of citizens gaze into the darkness. “You can see it better there by the light,” someone says. Down below, the water has a yellow glow – is it the light? No, it’s the plume. “It’s here – oh, no!” exclaims someone. Another man is calculating the CFS (river flow) & wondering how long it will take to go through town.

 

Friday, Aug. 7

5:30 a.m.

We wake to the sounds of our neighbor arranging his hoses as he begins to water his lawn. The City has asked all citizens to conserve water and to refrain from watering outdoors. This guy is watering before daylight and by 6:30 his hoses are hidden.

 

6 a.m.

The sky flushes a deep red with sunrise. Rain in the forecast. I hurry out the door, hop on my bike and in minutes I see it: the orange river. At the 32nd St bridge, there are more folks than usual for this hour. Everyone has cameras. Some folks chat quietly sharing the latest news. It’s acidic. It’s got minerals. Durango drinking water is OK. Somebody knows somebody who worked at the mine – it wasn’t supposed to happen…

 

6:30 a.m., 33rd St put-in

It’s still hard to integrate. The river shouldn’t be orange. A heron lifts off the water, legs colored orange. Kingfishers fly low, up and down, up and down, squawking, squawking. I see a beaver nosing through the thick orange river & my heart breaks – tears…

A young woman is snapping photos of the orange slime on the riverbank. We are all instant friends somehow – she grew up here & has never seen anything like it even though her father tells her it’s happened before – “but in the ’70s it was a grey spill” she says, “I don’t even remember it – not like this.” It’s so sad, I say, telling her about the beaver. She’s noticed the kingfishers too and says, “Yeah, that got me just now – we can stay out – but what about them? their bellies are all orange…”

In the ’20s there was a spill of 127 million gallons, but this spill – 100 million gallons, “approximately” – is the second largest in history.

And why did it take 24 hours for us to hear the news? we wonder. 10:30 a.m. Wednesday was the spill. At noon Thursday it hit Durango’s media. “I work on computers all day & we heard nothing for 24 hours – I can’t believe nobody in Silverton tweeted about it – Why the delay???” a friend asks.

 

7 a.m.

At 29th St. on the river trail I watch some mergansers. The little family huddles on rocks. One bird jumps in, gets right back out. They stand on the rocks, shaking and fluffing their feathers and plucking and plucking and shaking.

A friend from Bayfield texts: “The river will never be the same again. Where can we move to? I don’t want to see it.”

“There goes that watershed,” someone comments.

 

10 a.m.

KSUT is announcing the latest news. We will be notified when the river is safe. The EPA tests, which will tell us what’s in the water, are expected this afternoon. Farmington is getting ready. The Bureau of Rec is releasing water from Navajo Dam to dilute the “plume.”

Animas River is “closed” to state line (How do you “close” the river to a beaver?) This crud will flow into the San Juan & then the Colorado…

 

Noon

Helicopters hovering over north Durango. Skies are grey. River is looking brighter – more yellow, less orange – thinning out.

Enough for now.

Janneli F. Miller teaches environmental studies at Fort Lewis College in Durango.

Published in August 2015 Tagged , ,

Words’ worth: A vote to strike down a Navajo fluency requirement raises questions

Editor’s note: This online version corrects mistakes concerning figures that were contained in the print version of this article in the August 2015 Free Press.

The Navajo Nation’s July 21 passage of a referendum eliminating the requirement for presidential and vice presidential candidates to be fluent in the Navajo language has prompted far-reaching discussions about its impacts.

IRENE HAMILTON

Irene Hamilton, a retired language arts teacher, reads from one of the Native American Material Development Center books produced and published in 1976. Photo by Sonja Horoshko

Supporters said it will help young Navajos, many of whom aren’t fluent, to become more involved in politics. They said the value of a candidate’s fluency will be decided by voters in primary and general elections. If a candidate is not fluent in Diné Bizaad (the language of the Navajo people) yet wins the election, then the people will have deemed language fluency an insignificant issue.

But many educators, traditionalists, and language specialists are concerned that the referendum’s passage is a step toward the death of the language altogether, and possibly a threat to tribal sovereignty.

Previously, Navajo regulations required presidential and vice presidential candidates to state on their filing papers that they were fluent.

But during the latest presidential election, originally scheduled for November 2014, the fluency of candidate Chris Deschene was challenged in court. After months of petitions and appeals, and delays in the election, the Navajo Supreme Court disqualified him based on his failure to prove his fluency during testimony before the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Russell Begaye, the third-place winner in the primary, then replaced Deschene on the ballot for the general election against Joe Shirley, a former two-time Navajo President, and the first-place winner in the August 2014 primary.

Begaye ultimately won.

The issue deeply divided the Diné, fueling a debate that resulted in Navajo council legislation that ordered a referendum on fluency. The legislation also provided $317,000 funding to support the election on July 21.

When the referendum was held, 24,795 people, 21 percent of registered voters, came to the polls. The referendum passed by 1,239 votes, less than 1 percent of the total population of the Navajo people (approximately 287,000, which includes children and unregistered members of the tribe). Slightly less than 10 percent of the total registered voters decided the future value of the Navajo language for the whole tribe.

“I don’t know any tribe that would vote to not require their president to speak their native language,” commented Manuel Morgan of Aneth, Utah. “What did it show the youth? It showed them that the language doesn’t matter, that the Navajo culture doesn’t matter.”

The importance of Navajo language fluency, now placed in the hands of the voters, will affect the outcome of the elections as soon as 2018. According to some comments on social media, opponents saw the decision as a threat to the tribe’s sovereignty, an opening of the door to outside corporate interests and cultural colonization.

“It is the beginning of our demise,” added Morgan. “Say goodbye to our traditions, as well.”

 

‘Enthusiasm and

conviction’

In 1976, Gloria Emerson, Tse Daa K’aan Chapter, was appointed director of the Native American Material Development Center. She worked with more than 20 employees to develop the first classroom materials written and produced entirely in the Navajo language and suitable for use for K-12 grade levels.

“The project was charged with energy,” said Emerson, in a recent interview. “I hired the best Navajo speakers, writers, graphic illustrators and production people and they just took to it. It was an atmosphere of enthusiasm and conviction about our vision and purpose.”

The project publications were heralded at the time for their innovative approach to Navajo language and culture. Soon after, a 1984 Navajo regulation made language education a requirement. The NAMDC materials and curriculum, still available at the Pine Hill warehouse, a project of the Ramah Navajo School Board, have been quietly in use without much oversight for 40 years.

In an effort to identify the effects of the referendum vote on the language use, a group of academic, government, education and political grassroots advocates, many of them the former employees of the NAMDC project, gathered on July 30 at the Western New Mexico University campus in Gallup, N.M.

The discussion concentrated on the revitalization of the Navajo language and its value in relation to culture, sovereignty and tribal identity. The conversation at the meeting was not about English-language classes, English as Second Language or English Only programs. Instead, it focused on the assessment of the current use of the language and possible projects and policies that would re-vitalize the use and fluency of speakers.

Emerson rallied the support of three former employees, Rose Fasthorse Nofchissey, her sister Lydia, and Anna Redsand, to organize the gathering in Gallup.

In opening remarks, Emerson said 10 years ago she visited a reservation classroom where a Navajo language program was being taught. “Here was the classroom with the materials and curriculum, students and teachers. But it was quiet. Quiet. No one was speaking the language. They were reading and writing, but not speaking.”

“The heart of continuing the language is found in speaking it,” adds Rose Fasthorse Nofchissey, a teacher at Navajo Preparatory school in Farmington, N.M. “It really is that easy to define. Based on what we value and believe in, if we say it in English then we value English more than our own language. By passing the referendum we have accepted assimilation and dominance of the Euro-American ways,” she said.

She listed the five levels of use that define the death of a language. “When the language is alive it is being used all over the reservation by all ages and everyone speaks the language.” But today, she said, “the lack of use by the people and especially by the younger people indicates that the Diné language is only one step above extinction.”

At the meeting, Lydia Fasthorse Nofchissey, a language educator at Window Rock High School, introduced a series of breakout groups asking participants to define the depth of language loss by identifying the current state of its use and the implications of the language referendum.

 

Death of a language

Ancita Benally, a specialist in the DODE Language Culture and Education department, said in a phone interview that the 2010 census showed the number of Navajo speakers at 169,471.

In 2004, Navajo language ability was measured in a survey of all reservation agency Head Start children. At that time only 1 percent of them spoke the language.

More recently, the 2014-15 oral language assessment among K-12 students across the Navajo Nation showed that 98-99 percent of the students are non-proficient in their native language.

Although Morgan did not attend the meeting, he said in an interview afterward, “The referendum politicized our language, our culture. The point of this election was to recognize that we don’t speak our language. Deschene should have admitted it and said, ‘I’m gonna learn Diné Bizaad.’ But he didn’t.”

Morgan’s wife, Yanua Adakai, said it’s obvious that education programs are not working, and also explained that any student can get out of the class if they bring a note from their parents saying they don’t need to study Navajo.

“The answer is in speaking Navajo. The vote showed that,” she added, “but you can’t blame the schools. Maybe we should ask the Mexicans. Every little Mexican child I know speaks fluent Spanish. Why? Because it is spoken to them in the home.”

 

Border identities

Issues of sovereignty and the right to require Navajo language in reservation schools arise when policies are set by the Navajo government. Do state education standards supersede Navajo standards?

“The new state standards are only four years old. How much can the schools do?” Reuben McCabe, asked the group. He is Senior Education Specialist at the NN Division of Diné Education. “After the referendum the Division [of Diné Education] is already hearing that some schools are saying they don’t have to offer the language programs.” He suggested the Navajo council look at community-level language policies.

The use of language as border identityalso raises the issue of sovereign boundaries. As an example, the use of the Navajo language for all signage and names of all roads and communities in the Navajo Nation would create a link, a relationship between language and place.

If a visitor crosses a border into another country and the language changes on the other side, the visitor knows she has entered a different country. If the language on both sides is the same, then the border is obscured.

Way-finding, the urban/community planning term for mapping and signage, is a domain that could be used as an assertion of sovereignty. So could the radio.

The group emphasized the influence that the radio station KTNN had on the referendum vote. The all-Navajo-speaking station is broadcast throughout the reservation and surrounding border regions. In their assessments the group stated that it was an example of a domain that is changing the language because it is adapting the pronunciation to the needs of the domain.

“Domain is a socio-linguistic term,” explained Redsand, “The radio is an example of commercialized Navajo. It is becoming its own dialect.” A fluent Navajo speaker, she is an educator, a sociolinguist, and the author of books based on her experience growing up as a child of missionary parents on the rez, including the forthcoming memoir, “White Rez Kid.”

“Language planning is all about language maintenance and modernization in service of maintenance. As a sociolinguist, I can strongly affirm that language policy matters in the maintenance of endangered languages.”

Other domains, such as Facebook and YouTube, are potential education venues.

William P. Yazzie of Chinle, Ariz., sang some Navajo social songs for the group. He also demonstrated, through a YouTube rendition of Santa Claus is Coming to Town in Navajo (which was quite entertaining) how language learning could be accessed through use of the Internet.

Laura Tohe, author, poet and professor at Arizona State University, identified another domain for the group, less obvious than the media. While she attends writing and poetry workshops at schools throughout the reservation she looks at literature-class curriculums, suggested reading lists and libraries.

“I was in a workshop in a Navajo high school a few years ago. While there I looked into the English literature classes. No Navajo writers’ books were being taught. I found mostly dead white male authors.

“It is important to include our own writers, such as Lucy Tapahonso and other Native writers, indigenous authors. There are many of us.”

The literature curriculums, reading lists and libraries create an almost invisible domain sanctioned by educational standards that “value the dominant Bilagaana culture,” she said.

 

Role of the elders

During the brainstorming sessions it was agreed that the referendum divided generations, families, and spouses.

Rose Nofchissey observed, “The referendum lost sight of the real purpose – the elderly vision of cultural preservation. It gave more credence and emphasis to the politicizing of Diné Bizaad.”

There were suggestions from the group to address the absence of elders in the learning process, such as “nest” language centers based mostly at the chapter level, where elders and younger people could use the language together. They hope it will be possible to align Diné language with social and ceremonial events.

The group also advocates having elders in the classroom and encouraging programs where elders become part of the community again.

“Travel learning would connect historic places to the memory of the elders. It brings a different appreciation,” added Tohe.

“I went with Harry Walters on a trip to sacred land near Farmington and while I was there I could peel back layers of Navajo stories, visit the stories. Travel with this in mind will encourage a respect for our land, the sacred earth.”

Many of the original books published by the NAMDC project were brought to the meeting from the warehouse. They covered 12 large conference tables.

Rose Nofchissey showed a book that translated “The Little Red Hen” into Navajo. “This is an example of valuing the English story translated into Navajo over a Navajo story written in Navajo,” she said.

Another book, “Texts of the Navajo Creation Chants,” published by Peabody Museum of Harvard University, was translated and printed in English only. Identity is blurred in both of these examples, she explained.

English was also the language used on the recent referendum ballot. “Wording of the ballot was confusing, and many who intended to vote against the change inadvertently voted for it,” said Redsand. It was even more difficult for elder voters because it manipulated the English language until it was not clear whether a yes vote supported the requirement for language fluency, or not.

Seeking official Navajo policies on language usage and requirements is a step toward ownership of the issue while exercising the rights of sovereignty, and slowing down the demise of the language, attendees agreed.

The meeting in Gallup was an example of language engendering social structure. All participants spoke Navajo. Everyone was addressed by kinship, which is formalized in the structure of the language.

The communication pattern allowed time for consideration of topics. The meeting was conducted primarily in Navajo and even though people disagreed at times it was productive, polite and inclusive.

Emerson asked representatives of the Division of Diné Education to move in partnership with them, to come together with the group and to create a language commission.

“Our language has been politicized by this referendum, but through community action we can pressure the tribe to take a leadership role to express our sovereignty and declare our Navajo language the official language of the Nation. We can’t afford to lose more time.”

Note: The Navajo language was used during the meeting more than 90 percent of the time. Translations and interpretations were clarified for the Free Press by various participants in the conference as needed.

Published in August 2015 Tagged

Animas River closed to recreation because of spill

The Animas River has been closed to all watercraft as of 3 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 6, because of the contamination of the Animas River from a spill of mining waste.

La Plata County Sheriff Sean Smith issued an order pursuant to CRS 33-13-111 and 112, closing the Animas River to all watercraft including canoes, kayaks, tubes, rafts and other flotation devices from the north County line (San Juan County, Colorado) to the south County line (at the Colorado/New Mexico State line) until further notice. Furthermore, all such watercraft must be removed from the Animas River within the locations cited above, according to the La Plata County web site.

“This Order shall remain in effect until it is determined that the river is safe,” Smith said in a release. “EPA test results of the Animas River are expected within 24-48 hours, and the Order will be re-evaluated at that time.”

Meanwhile, the City of Durango is reassuring its water utility customers that their tap water is safe for consumption because all pumping of raw water from the Animas River was discontinued Wednesday, Aug. 5. The Utilities Department continues to draw raw water from the Florida River, which was not affected by the release of waste water from the Gold King Mine, according to information in a release. However, the water taken from the Florida River is not enough to meet the daily demands during the summer months and is usually supplemented with water from the Animas River. Because the city will not begin pumping water from the Animas River until notified that it is safe to do so, residents are asked to immediately take steps to reduce their water usage and discontinue all outdoor watering until further notice.

A Call Center has been set up for the public at 970-385-8700.

The spill reportedly occurred when an EPA and State Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety team working to investigate and address contamination at the Gold King Mine in San Juan County, Colo., unexpectedly triggered a large release of mine waste water into the upper portions of Cement Creek, which feeds into the Animas. Initial estimates are that the release contained approximately 1 million gallons of water that was held behind unconsolidated debris near an abandoned mine portal. There were several workers at the site at the time of the breach, all were unharmed.

The acidic mine water associated with the release contains high levels of sediment and metals.  EPA teams are conducting sampling and visual observations will be monitoring river conditions over the next several days.  The water associated with the release is highly discolored.

All agricultural water users have been notified to shut off water intake. It is recommended that pet owners keep their dogs and livestock out of the Animas River until further testing can be done to determine the content of the waste water.

Colorado Parks and Wildlife is reportedly monitoring the impacts to the fish and other wildlife in the Animas River.

Published in August 2015 Tagged , ,

Oil boom leads to crime (Prose and Cons)

There remain in the New West a select few old-school Westerners on whom a Stetson truly fits. Perennial New York Times-bestselling mystery/thriller author and Wyoming native son C.J. Box is one.

BADLANDS BY CJ BOXBox’s Stetson-wearing bonafides derive primarily from his series of 15 mysteries featuring Wyoming game warden Joe Pickett, a leather-tough and highly moral — though often-bumbling — family man. Box’s new stand-alone thriller, “Badlands,” proves his Stetson bonafides as well, even as he stretches himself and his readers beyond the Pickett safety net by featuring the thoughts and world views of a frumpy, whip-smart female law officer and a mentally challenged 12-year-old boy.

Though Southwest Colorado’s oil-fracking boom has largely gone bust, area readers will recognize and easily relate to “Badlands’” setting: the fracking boomtown of Grimstad, N.D. Box is known for his ability to portray a strong sense of place in his Pickett mysteries. Despite decamping from warden Pickett’s familiar Wyoming mountains for the windswept High Plains, Box paints the fictional town of Grimstad with a knowing brush. Readers see, feel and even smell Grimstad’s oil-worker-packed strip joints, its truck-clogged, diesel-fumed streets, and its overpriced, ant-colony-like rental units.

As the oil money really begins to flow in Grimstad, ruthless West Coast criminals arrive to take what they see as their share. Dead bodies and tattooed body parts accumulate around town, leading newly hired Bakken County deputy sheriff Cassie Dewel down one dark hole after another in pursuit of the evil-doers. When adolescent paper boy Kyle Westergaard happens upon a bagful of the criminals’ cash and drugs, he and Dewel team up in a desperate attempt to save Kyle’s troubled mother.

The wisest of old-school Westerners here in Southwest Colorado and beyond are capable of welcome surprise — coming to understand and empathize with LGBT issues, perhaps, or recognizing that, yes, some taxes, and the communal perks those taxes fund, are A-OK. In the same way, Box’s willingness to risk moving beyond Pickett and his Wyoming back yard to bring to life characters of various ages and genders in a fresh and frightening new locale makes “Badlands” a solid addition to his oeuvre, and marks Box as a New Old Westerner of the highest authorial order.

The risk Box took when he released his first stand-alone thriller, 2008’s “Blue Heaven,” paid off when it won the Edgar Award for Best Novel, the top annual prize of the Mystery Writers of America. Those who read “Badlands” will enjoy keeping an eye out for similar awards Box’s fifth stand-alone effort is sure to garner.

Scott Graham is the National Outdoor Book Award-winning author of seven books, most recently “Mountain Rampage” (Torrey House Press), the second installment in the National Park Mystery Series. Visit him at scottfranklingraham.com.

Published in August 2015, Prose and Cons Tagged , ,

Judge accused of bias in Lyman case

Motion seeks Shelby’s recusal; prosecution calls charge ‘unfounded’

A federal judge’s friendship with the legal director of an environmental organization has led to a motion to have him removed from a case against two Utah men involved in a protest ATV ride in 2014.

Phil Lyman, the San Juan County commissioner who initiated the ride last summer, and Monte Wells, a Monticello man, were found guilty by a jury May 1 in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City on two misdemeanor charges related to the ride. Two other men were acquitted.

The protest, in which motorized users drove through a closed portion of the Recapture Canyon trail near Blanding, drew hundreds of attendees as well as nationwide attention. Lyman said it was intended to object to what he sees as over-reaching actions by the Bureau of Land Management, which closed part of the trail in 2007 to protest Ancestral Puebloan ruins.

Lyman and Wells were slated to be sentenced July 15, but the date was extended by 60 days when Lyman hired new counsel.

Now, Lyman is seeking to have U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby removed from the case, charging that his friendship with Steven Bloch of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, an environmental non-profit, shows he is too biased to act fairly.

In a motion filed July 20, Lyman’s attorney said they recently learned that Shelby had a “direct, personal relationship” with Bloch, legal director of SUWA, and this indicated he was biased.

Shelby has asked Chief Judge David Nuffer to assign a different district judge to rule on Lyman’s motion.

The motion, written by attorney Anneli Smith of Clyde Snow & Sessions, quotes comments Shelby made as part of an unrelated case involving litigation over road claims under a federal statute called RS 2477.

Shelby is quoted as saying that he wanted to disclose that, “Steve Bloch and his wife Kara are friends of mine and have been for a long, long time,” having socialized with Shelby and his wife since 1999. “We have dinner, are couples together and with other friends not infrequently,” Shelby stated.

He further explained that he would not preside over any cases involving Bloch personally, but does not recuse himself from all cases related to SUWA. “I don’t hear any cases in which Steve appears. . . I don’t recuse from any matters involving SUWA. I don’t think I know anyone else that works at SUWA. If I do, I don’t know who they are. And so long as Mr. Bloch’s not involved in our case [the civil matter involving road claims], I intend to remain in the case, but I wanted to make that disclosure.”

SUWA was not a party to the charges against Lyman and Wells. However, in the motion seeking Shelby’s removal, Lyman’s attorney said that his prosecution for the ATV ride had been “strongly urged” by SUWA, that it had “sharply criticized” him on its website, and that SUWA “has also had extensive direct contact with the government concerning the prosecution of this case.”

The motion also notes that SUWA was “made the subject of voir dire [questioning] of the jury in this case.”

Additionally, the motion charges, Bloch attended Lyman’s trial, and “Mr. Bloch and others at SUWA have been actively involved in the prosecution of Mr. Lyman. SUWA has joined with the Grand Canyon Trust, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club in writing a letter to this Court advocating a stiff sentence for Mr. Lyman.”

“This relationship and involvement lead a reasonable person to question the Court’s impartiality, and thus require that this Court disqualify itself,” the motion states.

But in a response filed July 28, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said any insinuation that SUWA or Bloch had a role in the United States’ decision to charge Lyman, or other decisions regarding the trial, was “unfounded.”

“No member of SUWA ever met or corresponded with the United States Attorney or any Assistant United States Attorney to discuss whether to file charges or which charges to file against Mr. Lyman for his organization of and participation in the illegal May 10, 2014 ride through Recapture Canyon,” the response states. “The United States Attorney at that time made the charging decisions after consulting with the senior managers and line prosecutors in the USAO and with BLM law enforcement. Neither Mr. Bloch nor any other representative of SUWA participated in those charging discussions.”

It was SUWA attorney Liz Thomas, not Bloch, who repeatedly contacted BLM personnel, usually by email, to send them news articles about the ride, as well as some of Lyman’s Facebook posts, the response says. Thomas did urge the agency to enforce its closure order in the canyon, and on occasion BLM officials met with her to discuss Recapture Canyon.

Meeting with representatives of various interests is not unusual, the response states. “BLM has met with many interested parties, including San Juan County, for several years regarding San Juan’s County’s application for a right-of-way through Recapture Canyon and BLM’s general management of the canyon.”

Furthermore, the document states, “none of the BLM officials with whom Thomas may have met have the authority to charge Mr. Lyman, to decide which charges to bring, or how to try the case. That function is entirely within the United States Department of Justice.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office also said that although SUWA and other conservation organizations sent a joint letter to Shelby regarding sentencing, it was not signed by Bloch or anyone else personally.

“And instead of ‘advocating a stiff sentence for Mr. Lyman,’ as he alleges in his Motion. . . the unsigned letter from the conservation groups asks the Court to impose ‘punishment commensurate with the severity of their crimes’ and ‘punishment that reflects the egregiousness of their crimes.”

As far as the voir dire process (in which jurors are questioned to see if they have biases), it was Lyman and his co-defendants who “actually proposed the voir dire questions about whether potential jurors had any affiliation with SUWA,” according to the response.

“. . . . Judge Shelby’s decision to ask Mr. Lyman’s proposed voir dire questions demonstrated Judge Shelby’s desire to give Mr. Lyman a fair trial by allowing him to investigate whether each potential juror who admitted affiliation with SUWA and other conservation groups was indeed biased.”

Expecting judges never to have friends who have any interest in a particular case would pose a ridiculous burden, the response states.

“According to Mr. Lyman, a judge must recuse him/herself when the judge has a friend who serves as an attorney for a group that is merely interested in the outcome of a case but is not a party thereto or a participant therein. . . . Indeed, if such a standard obtains, then judges will have to recuse themselves in nearly every case because, unless a judge is bereft of any family or friends, the interests of the groups with which friends and family affiliate will be imputed to a judge. . . Such a standard would impose an absurd burden on judges and the administration of justice, which no objective observer of the judiciary could tolerate.”

A Garfield County commissioner recently wrote Utah Gov. Gary Herbert urging him to intervene to have Judge Shelby recused from the case, according to the Deseret News. Commission Chairman Leland Pollock sent a letter to the governor recently with “my most aggressive personal request for your strongest efforts to influence a recusal by Judge Shelby in the Phil Lyman case.” The governor’s office said it would not be appropriate for the governor to intervene in a court case, according to the News.

As of press time, the sentencing was still scheduled for Sept. 15 in Salt Lake City. Lyman and Wells face penalties of up to a year in prison and fines of up to $100,000, as well as possible restitution for alleged damages to the trail estimated at more than $170,000.

Lyman, who initially was represented by a public defender but then had to hire his own counsel after he was found not to qualify for public assistance, has incurred steep legal costs. (Wells has a public defender.)

Lyman sought assistance from Utah’s taxpayer-funded Constitutional Defense Council, which helps in efforts to fight battles with the federal government over public-lands issues, but that group – which has never funded an individual’s defense in a criminal case – chose not to aid him.

However, he is receiving numerous private donations, including a $10,000 gift from Governor Herbert. Lyman’s supporters say the BLM’s “interim” closure of Recapture Canyon to motorized use was not done properly and has continued for too long without a permanent decision being made.

Following his conviction, Lyman told the Free Press that the protest ride burgeoned into something beyond what he’d envisioned and that there were outsiders in the crowd urging people to go onto the closed part of the route (Free Press, May 2015).

“There were a lot of undercover organizations there,” he said. “That was so unfair. That wasn’t Blanding’s protest. We’re very law-abiding, normal, and peaceful and most of all we value the resources.”

Published in August 2015 Tagged ,

Our county’s negative notoriety

Hooray, hooray, Cortez is leading the way – to the bottom. I saw in the news recently that we here in Montezuma County have garnered the dubious distinction of being the eighth-worst place to live in the state of Colorado. I know the list actually said Cortez, but Cortez is in Montezuma County, and all fish smell the same when they are in the same bucket.

Now, I realize this list was put together by one small outfit on the Internet and it may not be perfectly fair, but it provides us the chance to think about this place where we live and how it is faring.

At one time this was a thriving community with access to many prospering avenues. McElmo Canyon was noted for its fruits and vegetables. Many in the area were shipping apples, cherries, peaches, and apricots out. There was a vigorous downtown area appealing to visitors and locals alike and offering the necessities of living in a rural town.

But then there came setbacks and panic set in and with PPLS we hastily encouraged the scourge of small towns to come here, giving them tax incentives that small struggling local businesses never got. We allowed ourselves to become dependent on energy/ CO2 extraction for a huge portion of our economy. What, I ask, sustained the forefathers here who built our towns and developed this area without CO2 and gas and oil? If we have become dependent on just one enterprise we are in dire straits. One should always have a little mad money in one’s shoe – if not, you are left standing by the side of the road.

Why are not the leaders of Montezuma County and the three municipalities getting together to route a plan that benefits all? It is astonishing to me that so much of our taxes are spent on leadership, yet we have none. Are they proud of the fact that Montezuma County is close to the bottom?

One area badly in need of improvement is education, yet this need is recognized by only a few. It brings tears to my eyes when I see our little ones so proud and eager on their first day of school, then as time goes on, we slam the door in their faces by not giving them the necessary equipment and support. It is hard to make the farm profitable when the tractor is running on only one cylinder.

Look at the failure of the bond issue that would have supported badly needed improvements to Southwest Open School. Now, instead of a campus we could all have been proud of, we wind up with another gas station. Where were our elected leaders in supporting this issue? They were very quiet.

Forward thinking seems to be lacking as a whole in our community. We are great about placing the blame on others, not having ever walked in their moccasins. Everything that is wrong here is somehow the fault of someone back in Washington, D.C. We waste too much time and energy picking fights with the federal government and don’t spend enough time looking at what we can do locally to improve things.

First we’re terrified of some prairie chicken that we have driven nearly to extinction and we want to pass measures to try to keep it away. Then we spend good money to join some ridiculous club that does little but improve the financial status of a Utah legislator. It angers me when those that enjoy an income from our tax money – who sit in a government chair before a government-provided table in a government building – decry government, and some of us mistakenly and ignorantly join in this tirade.

Instead, our elected county commissioners should come together with Dolores, Mancos and Cortez leaders to develop innovative ideas, pursue grants, and do whatever it takes to turn this area around. That is what great leaders do.

Galen Larson writes from Montezuma County, Colo.

Published in Galen Larson

Court puts kibosh on local Bong-a-Thon

by David Long
Somewhere, over the cannabis-enhanced rainbow, the 32nd annual Colorado Invitational Bong-a-thon will soon be filling the state’s dreamy skies with happy smoke – a two-day celebration of the drug by a thousand adoring potheads.
But the budster bacchanalia definitely won’t be held anywhere in Montezuma County.
After a brief hearing July 22, District Judge Todd Plewe granted the county’s request for a temporary restraining order to stop the event, originally planned by organizers to be held July 31-Aug. 1 in a lush grassy meadow along Highway 145 a few miles northeast of Dolores.
Plewe said under the injunction Montezuma County Sheriff Steve Nowlin “may use reasonable and appropriate means to enforce this order.” Nowlin had expressed concern that without such a court order, he lacked the legal muscle to prevent the gathering, and could only cite the organizers for violating the county land-use code once the event was underway.
Even though the county commissioners had unanimously denied special-use and high-impact permits for the gathering on June 29, organizer Chris Jetter initially indicated the Bong-a-Thon would be held as scheduled, maintaining no permit was needed other than for amplified music.
The commissioners and Planning Director LeeAnn Milligan had cited an incomplete application and lack of time for holding the required public hearing as reasons for denying the permit, but Jetter contended that the county had ample time to consider it and was only reflecting an anti-marijuana attitude prevalent among many local officials statewide.
The “Bong-a-thon” is a marijuana-smoking marathon featuring a variety of competitive events for both individuals and teams to see who can smoke the most herb, consume set amounts the fastest or continue smoking ganga for the longest period. Musical concerts and vendors of paraphernalia and hemp garb add flavor to the fume-filled festival.
According to Jetter, who owns a retail pot dispensary in the Denver area, a clandestine Bong-a-Thon was first held in 1974, continued for several years and then, after a lengthy hiatus, resurrected in 2010, being openly held in Park County for the past five years. However, Jetter told the Free Press, onerous changes in that county’s zoning regulations prompted him to seek another location.
He said he was invited to hold the festival in Stoner by Frank McDonald, who has long held ambitions to develop a marijuana-friendly resort in the Dolores River Canyon and has dubbed himself “mayor” of the unincorporated area.
The injunction was sought against Jetter, McDonald (whose role was unclear), and Ted Clark, the owner of the property off CR 38.5 on which the smoke-a-thon was to be held.
After outraged neighbors observed some initial preparations underway at the proposed location, they attended a commission meeting July 10 to seek assurance the Bong-a-Thon would be nipped in the bud, and the commissioners instructed county attorney John Baxter to request the injunction, even though there had been some strong indications on various websites – including www.bong-a-thon.com – the organizers were planning on holding it elsewhere anyway, possibly near Pueblo. Only those paying for “invitations” were being informed of the exact location.
Nowlin told the commission on July 20 he had arranged to borrow electronic signs from the state to display messages near the site informing would-be bongers that the event was cancelled.
Representing McDonald and Clark, Durango attorney Ryan Brungard, who participated in the court hearing by phone, asked Plewe to remove their names from the injunction to prevent further “negative publicity” about them. He blamed “media” for erroneously associating them with the event in the first place, even though McDonald had informed the county planning department the event would include his wedding and therefore was a private affair, and Clark is the listed owner of the parcel.
Plewe denied the request, and the injunction he issued included all three men.
(For more detailed coverage of the Bong-a-Thon saga, see the July Free Press.)

Published in July 2015

Court puts kibosh on local Bong-a-Thon

Published in July 2015

To forgive is divine

Preface:

When I was 14, I convinced my brother Kent’s friends, Steve and Rick (aged 17) to teach me to drive Rick’s car. Kent was out for a run and my parents were in Europe. God only knows where the babysitter was, but knowing her, she probably would have encouraged this dumb-ass decision.

After just a few miles, during which I barely stayed on the road and either Rick or Steve should have had the wherewithal to take back the wheel, I rounded a corner and ended up face to face with a telephone pole.

Crushed fender. Power outage in a 3-mile radius. Broken nose.

Steve drove us home and we promptly began tossing the football around to create the setting for our story of me getting hit in the face with the football á la Marcia Brady.

Oh. My. Nose.

Brother came home – reenactment.

Babysitter came home – embellished tale.

Parents home from Germany – story so well polished that telling them that it no longer seemed a lie.

Jump ahead a couple of years to difficulty breathing and a bizarre ability to whistle through my nostrils, and a visit to the doctor.

He looked inside and asked “How did you break your nose?”

By now, the story was quite old and dusty – it felt a bit stilted and a lot bullshitty. As the words were coming out of my mouth, my brain was sure that he was going to declare, “There’s no way that a football did this amount of damage.”

Bless his heart, he didn’t.

Did he believe me? If he did, I’m glad I didn’t let him operate.

Jump ahead a few more years, Kent and I are home from college for a visit and my father says, “We are going to have Amnesty Night.”

?????????

“Each one of us will confess to something that he or she has done (bad) and no one will get in trouble.”

I couldn’t wait to get the accident off of my chest. I already had gray hair from the weight of the lie in addition to my penchant for whistling show tunes without opening my mouth.

Mom went first. Hers was pretty big, but you know, since she’s the mom, and Dad already knew her secret, she had no fear of repercussions.

Kent refused to participate.

Then it was my turn. My legs turned to Jell-O, sweat poured down my sides and I dry-heaved a tiny bit.

“Are you sure that I won’t get in trouble?”

“Even if it’s really bad?”

“Really? Total amnesty?”

“You won’t get mad?”

“I’ll be allowed to return to college?”

Arms shaking, chin quivering, voice barely audible, I dove in, losing confidence as I told the tale, certain of my imminent evisceration, but in far enough that there was no stopping.

At the end…silence.

I’d gone too far, shared too much, disappointed them beyond words.

And then, Mom, “Oh, we already knew that.”

Are. You. F-ing. Kidding.

Me???????????

“Oh yeah, Steve’s mom told us the day after it happened.

My parents are better liars than I am. My mother was at that doctor’s appointment and didn’t let on?

Brilliant.

Bowels loosening, I ran to the bathroom.

When I returned, Dad was up. I thought, “After what I just confessed, this better be good.”

“I broke something (some innocuous ceramic doo-dad placed in the never used guest bathroom) and glued it back together.”

That’s it? I just lost ten years of my life and you broke something that Kent and I didn’t even know existed and glued it back together? So unfair.

And yet, what came out of this, besides my first night of guilt-free sleep in 6 years, was a family tradition of Amnesty Nights; an every-so-often confession without the requisite Hail Marys.

Now that I am a mom, and a single one trying to raise teenagers at that, I have instituted Amnesty Night and I do believe it is a proof of my parenting genius.

For our first round I witnessed the same terror and lack of trust that I felt that first night with my parents. I was smart enough to establish that no one was allowed to abstain.

I still haven’t forgiven my brother for that.

They shook and sweated and quivered – while compassionate, I also relished their fear. Then, they told me.

Let’s just say it involved alcohol, lying, staying out all night, the mountains, driving with God-knows-who, and their poor innocent friend who had no idea that they were “staying at (his) house.”

Horrified and grateful that they survived to tell me this story, I took a big gulp of air and thanked them for their honesty.

“What about you, Mom?”

“Remember when _____ was sick? Well someone gave me some food to take to her which included homemade, dark chocolate truffles…”

Long story short, after arguing with my conscience about dipping into those beautiful treats, “She’s sick, they are a gift for her, you can’t be that friend, okay, just one.”

I ended up prone on my bed, stoned to the bejesus, thinking I was dying since I had no idea what was happening, all while the children were downstairs playing video games.

Once I finally put two and two together, I knew that even if I could have moved my legs, there was no way that I could interact face to face with the boys, so I sent them a text, “Everything okay? Are you having fun? I’m really tired – going to bed.”

I’m sure they snuck out.

But suddenly, there it was: trust.

And honesty.

Not always – I’m not that stupid – but more than I could wish for.

We’ve had a few Amnesty Nights since then, sometimes spontaneously instigated by one of the boys when his guilty consciences take over his addled teenage brains.

Sometimes, I want to throttle them for their stupidity, but there is the promise of no repercussions to which I adhere.

One time I called for Amnesty Night and their response was, “We’ve got nothing, Mom, we’ve told you everything.”

And for a mom of three boys who are children but think they are adults, that is music to my ears.

Suzanne Strazza is an award-winning writer in Mancos, Colo.

Published in Suzanne Strazza

Use them or lose them

Let’s start with a question. Name something you use that is not produced from the earth’s minerals or vegetation and waters.

Getting a headache from thinking? Take an aspirin. Wait, aspirin is from the bark of trees. You can stop thinking, there is nothing that we need or simply use to make for a more comfortable life that does not originate from the mineral earth, water and vegetation. The houses we live in, the cars we drive, the medicines we take, the clothes we wear, the food we eat, the electricity for our lights, heat for our houses, etc. and etc. The plastics come from trees and oil, as do many chemicals such as alcohol, turpentine, latex and even laxatives.

Do you have a new backpack for your hike to Navajo Lake? What is it made from? The metal frame came from a mining operation, the fabric may be a blend of material derived from plants, oil and or animal hides. Do you realize it took coal, oil and gas to manufacture and deliver that backpack to you? Recently people have been aghast that some fast-food hamburgers have wood pulp added as an extender. But those same people will order a veggie burger as a “safe” food. Guess what, they are eating more of the same “wood pulp” product that is in the hamburger.

So what is the point of all this? Today’s affluent society has achieved a perceived zenith of academic information that has led to excessive pride to the point of thinking we are greater than the Creator of the earth, its forests and man. The forests were created and made available for man to use, which we have done, to lead to the comfortable and affluent society we have today. Now we have segments of society whose greed seeks to prevent the rest of society from making continued use of and benefitting from the forests and other resources to produce jobs, economic wealth and pursuit of happiness. They seek to stop the use of the very things that has provided for and sustained them. It seems to be “well I’ve got mine, too bad for you, ha ha”!

Our forests are dying! They are dying a natural death! We cannot stop the forest from dying! That is what all living things do. What we can do is not waste them. We need to “Use Them or Lose Them.” If we do not use them, they will die and rot or burn up. We can use the products of the forest to benefit the local people’s lives so they have the economic ability to work to renew the forests for the next generation’s benefit.

What are the possibilities? Some think only of lumber and logs. Locally, we have a few wood-product manufacturers left that produce great products such as aspen and spruce paneling, excelsior for erosion control, bank stabilization and pine and spruce dimension lumber. Unfortunately, they are not able to meet even half of the forest health and renewal needs.

Other possibilities are Bio Char, an excellent soil conditioner. Bio-fuels could help satisfy electrical needs locally. Gasification of wood products is now even producing jet fuels. Since the U.S. imports pine and spruce wood products, markets need to be reassessed to make it profitable to utilize local wood instead. All these would create jobs, improve the economy, and revitalize the local dying forests.

Protection of the resource is also important. Any good business doesn’t want to run out of its basic resource, so is intent on ensuring it is healthy and continues indefinitely. Death from insects and disease is constant, with the dead trees and vegetation becoming fuel for wildfires. While this will always happen, it can be greatly reduced by the fuels being reduced by businesses use.

Here is something to think about. Dead trees and green trees that are too thick need to be removed, so taxes are used to pay people to cut down the trees. If you would like to cut down and remove those same trees for your fuel wood, you must pay! Would it make more sense for you to cut and remove the trees at no additional cost to you, and then be saving the tax cost of paying the government to do it? Also, did you realize that one of the big problems in wildfire controls is the grasses, low shrubs and forbs? One of the most effective fire-prevention tools is cattle, sheep and goats. They can mow down the “flash fuels”, thus reduce the rapid spread of the fires that do ignite. We charge a rancher to graze his livestock to reduce the fuel and keep it healthy and productive. The rancher is paying the government for it to save money by not having to do the same thing with equipment or setting prescribed fires at high costs. Is there something strange in this picture?

Bottom line is, the forests must be viewed as a total entity, producing maximum of wood, water, forage for use by man and beast, including livestock and wildlife. If that is achieved, then man’s leisure interests of various recreation and hunting and fishing will also excel.

Dexter Gill is a retired forest manager who worked for private industry, three Western state forestry agencies, and the Navajo Nation forestry department. He writes from Lewis, Colo.

Published in Dexter Gill

‘Run Free’: A romanticized view of a native people

RUN FREE: THE TRUE STORY OF CABALLO BLANCOIn a canyon deep in the Sierra Tarahumara of Northern Mexico, a lanky American nicknamed “Caballo Blanco” organized what Christopher McDougall describes in his popular book “Born to Run” as “The Greatest Race the World Has Never Seen.”

Now, a new film, “Run Free: The True Story of Caballo Blanco,” directed and written by Sterling Norlen, 2015 (Noren Films) offers another view of the race and the indigenous people who run it, the Rarámuri.

In Durango the film opened on April 28 to a full house of over 200 people. It was introduced as a film “about running” and the crowd was excited. Afterwards there were lots of comments about “how cool” the Rarámuri were. It had showed in Flagstaff, Ariz., the day before to a crowd of over 300. It was named the best documentary at the 2015 Arizona International Film Festival.

But as an anthropologist who lived in a Rarámuri community, I have a different view. From 1999 to 2001 I stayed in a small Rarámuri rancho in the Batopilas, working on my dissertation on Tarahumara birth. I have returned many times, often for months at a time, and I miss the region sorely when I am not there.

Since the Tarahumara were the focus of my work, I didn’t go out of my way to visit mestizo or gringo tourist towns, so I didn’t get down to Urique, where the Mas Locos running race is held.

Since the publication of “Born to Run” in 2009, several of us anthropologists who lived among the Tarahumara have become dismayed over the book’s portrayal of the Rarámuri. Now comes this film, already winning awards.

Remember: this is a documentary about a white male runner, Micah True – not the Tarahumara.

I met True in Batopilas in the late 1990s. On occasions I ran into him in Creel, but we inhabited different spheres, and I was not a close friend of his.

The movie does a nice job portraying True’s life through extensive interviews with him and his friends. We learn that he changed his name early in life, to reflect his philosophy; that he was a prize-fighting boxer, but didn’t want to talk about it. He travelled extensively in Southern Mexico and Central America, picking up the name Caballo Blanco in Guatemala, since he ran with his long blonde hair streaming in the sunshine.

True met the Tarahumara runners in 1994 in Leadville, Colo., when they were there to run the 100-mile race. We learn why True wanted to start the Copper Canyon Mas Locos 50 race, and how he felt about it becoming commercialized.

The last interviews with him are bittersweet – filmed only weeks before he died. True’s death is covered in an honorable and sensitive way, and this story of one runner’s life is touching.

Yes, “Run Free” is compelling and interesting – a character sketch of a man seeking something beyond American life and culture. A traveller who came of age in the ’60s, and wholeheartedly adopted the free-wheeling lifestyle and philosophy of those times.

What happens after he meets the Tarahumara runners is where McDougall picks up the story in “Born to Run,” and what “Run Free” seeks to clarify. Several runners interviewed in the movie, such as Luis Escobar and Scott Jurek, state that being around the Rarámuri changed their lives. (Sadly, no one in the film manages to pronounce “Rarámuri” correctly, including True.) The Rarámuri did change True’s life (they changed mine) and in the Sierra Madre, True finally found the peace and love he was looking for. While this was good for him, the repercussions of his engagement with the Rarámuri and their canyons remain to be seen.

I say this because, unfortunately, just as in “Born To Run,” the information about the Tarahumara in “Run Free” is frequently mistaken, even grossly incorrect. The Tarahumara as seen in this film are products of True’s vision, just as the Rarámuri in “Born to Run” are products of McDougall’s.

We hear interviews with mestizos in Urique, who are delighted about the commercial success of Caballo’s Copper Canyon race, because it brings in much-needed cash through tourism. We hear from Caballo, his girlfriend, other runners and locals, but we don’t hear from the Tarahumara. Interestingly, we don’t even hear any Rarámuri language in the film, and some of the translations of Rarámuri words are incorrect.

For instance, True translates “Rarámuri” as “people who run,” but this is an oversimplification, frequently used in promotional materials. The word variously refers to footprint, running, or ray of light, turtle, speed, and so on. The Rarámuri language is metaphoric and meaning is often derived from the context. Tarahumara and Rarámuri are used interchangeably. The canyon region is called the Sierra Tarahumara, and most people I knew called themselves Rarámuri. Perhaps “people who run” is an easy translation for people who like to run themselves and want to romanticize this indigenous group’s practices.

What is disturbing to me is why this is the thing about the Tarahumara that gets our attention – running. Yes, we want to hear about good stuff. Freedom, joy and sharing. But there’s so much more.

We don’t hear about rampant economic exploitation in the name of tourism. Did you know there was a gondola built to the bottom of the Urique canyon, just like the one planned in the controversial Escalade development in the Grand Canyon? The Rarámuri didn’t want it, but it was built anyway.

In the film we don’t hear about the narcos (drug traffickers) who are murdering mestizos and Tarahumara – forcing Rarámuri off their fields with AK 47s. We don’t hear about mestizos illegally logging remote old-growth forests with support from the World Bank, or the Trans Canada pipeline being (illegally) built through Tarahumara communities. We don’t hear about racist attitudes of some mestizos towards the Rarámuri.

We don’t hear about how the traditional rarajipe races in the Sierra are now diminished because evangelical missionaries are converting the Rarámuri in order to prohibit the drinking, gambling and sorcery that goes hand in hand with the races. (We also don’t hear about the gambling, drinking and sorcery that are common features of traditional Tarahumara running events.)

We don’t hear about GoldCorp, the mining company that sponsored Caballo’s 2012 race. We don’t hear about the hard, violent, and economically insecure lives that many Rarámuri live as a result of several hundred years of oppression, racism and exploitation by outsiders.

One scene shows Tarahumara in the 2012 race running alongside people from all over the world. True’s girlfriend says one indigenous man was running to get beans for his family. After the race, Tarahumara line up to receive a bag of beans from Caballo himself. We hear that todos son ganadores, (we are all winners) and that every participant gets some corn.

So people are rushing to “the middle of nowhere” to run “in peace and harmony” with the Rarámuri — most of whom are on the trail not for joy, but to earn a bag of beans. How can such economic disparity be celebrated? Why do we cheer the fact that people pay thousands of dollars to run with indigenous people who are running simply for food?

You don’t “help” a culture by romanticizing them or glorifying one aspect of their lives. You don’t help a culture by making them run 50 miles for a bag of beans and some GMO corn. You don’t help a culture by giving them handouts of jackets and food and congratulating yourselves.

This year the local government and business organizations sponsoring Caballo’s race cancelled it due to nearby violence (a massacre) associated with the drug trade. Some people from other countries who came in for the race ran anyway – for the Rarámuri – for Caballo – for the joy of running. And then, exhilarated by the run, they went home – away from the guns, empty bellies and noble Indians.

“Run Free” is a fine documentary about one man. But it is not about the Rarámuri. Hardly anything about these “amazing runners” in the film is accurate. Run on, yes, in peace and harmony, but when you’re finished, please take a moment to try to understand that when the Rarámuri say they want to “run free” and “be free,” they mean free from us! They want to be free to live in their remote canyons without tourists, mestizos, social workers, runners, developers, anthropologists, tour guides, film-makers, missionaries, movie stars, rock-climbers, and loggers asking them questions, taking their pictures, and giving them handouts.

I once heard a Mexican social worker say that when you ask the Rarámuri what they want, they say, “Go away and leave us alone.”

But will we?

Janneli F. Miller teaches at Fort Lewis College in Durango.

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Pros of prose: 3 local authors are nominated for Colorado Book Awards

LAST HEIRWhat do Ed Abbey’s outdoor legacy, 13 weeds for human survival, and a Napa Valley winery mystery have in common? These are the subjects of three books by Four Corners authors who have been nominated for a Colorado Book Award.

The awards – given annually to writers, editors, illustrators and photographers who live and work in Colorado – are sponsored by Colorado Humanities, an organization devoted to promoting an appreciation of Colorado’s cultural heritage since 1874.

The Colorado Book Awards began in 1991 and are a program of the Colorado Center for the Book, affiliated with the Library of Congress Center of the Book, both of which have the mission of inspiring a love of reading and books. In Colorado this means a wide range of subject matter is covered, as evidenced by the categories of awards: anthology/ collection, biography, children’s, creative nonfiction, fiction, history, nonfiction, pictorial, poetry and young adult.

Three books in each category are nominated, and the winners of this year’s competition will be announced at a ceremony on Sunday, June 21, at Aspen Meadows Resort in Aspen.

Chuck Greaves of Cortez is no stranger to awards. Originally from New York and educated as a lawyer, he spent 25 years trying cases in Los Angeles. In 2009 he left this successful career to write, and it was his first mystery novel, “Hush Money,” published in 2012, that brought him literary recognition, winning the South West Writers’ International Writing Contest. The book also was a finalist for the 2013 Rocky Award, Shamus Award, the 2012 RT Book Reviews Reviewers’ Choice Award and New Mexico-Arizona Book Awards- Best Mystery/Suspense.

This year’s nomination for the 2015 Colorado Book Award mystery category, “The Last Heir,” is the third in Greaves’ Jack MacTaggart series. The MacTaggart books take place in California, the current nominee an informative adventure in Napa Valley’s wine country. If you want an insider’s peek into the lux wine industry, this is the book for you.

MacTaggart is a lawyer-detective-man about town, whose escapades (following leads, driving fancy cars, romancing gorgeous women, throwing balls for his dog, and bantering with his partner, Mayday Suarez) are highly entertaining. All three mysteries are perfect summer reading, and there’s no need to read them in order, as each book stands alone.

“Authors spend a year or more with their noses pressed to a computer screen, so it’s always gratifying to have the effort recognized,” Greaves said. “As a relatively new Coloradoan, this nomination is doubly special, and I’m looking forward to attending the ceremony in Aspen on June 21 and meeting some of my fellow Colorado authors.” Another award-winning local author is Andrew Gulliford, who first received a Colorado Book Award in 2004 for “Boomtown Blues,” a revision of his Ph.D. dissertation examining the ups and downs of oil-shale development in Colorado. This year his newest book, “Outdoors in the Southwest: An Adventure Anthology,” has received the CBA nomination for best anthology.

OUTDOORS IN THE SOUTHWESTGulliford, a history professor at Fort Lewis College in Durango, is especially proud of this edited volume, noting that it was not easy to get published. The anthology contains excerpts from some of his favorite writers, such as Ed Abbey, Terry Tempest Williams and Craig Childs, and is organized around themes including “Why We Need Wilderness,” “Running Western Rivers,” “Canyons and Deserts,” and “Animal Encounters.”

Gulliford teaches a course on wilderness at Fort Lewis and through his association with students enrolled in the Outdoor Adventure program, he realized there was a need for more than what was offered in the texts. “I specifically wanted to reach out to a younger generation and come up with stories that they would be interested in reading; cautionary tales about things that can happen in the outdoors, so they can be prepared,” he told the Free Press.

Gulliford was concerned that “the greens are graying.” He noticed the younger generation had a different relationship with nature, being drawn to the outdoors through a desire to experience something extreme – with kayaks, mountain bikes, rafts, climbing gear – and then documenting their exploits with live gopro feeds or Instagram posts.

“They treat the outdoors like a dirty gym,” he said, and his concern was that the depth of experience that nature requires was being lost. Each section of the book concludes with study questions prepared by Fort Lewis students, which is one way Gulliford hopes to encourage readers to develop a deeper engagement with the ideas about the outdoors presented in the volume.

As an educator, Gulliford wanted to provide stories to illustrate the deeper connections between humans and the landscape: “What do we do around archaeological sites that is safe and ethical? What do we do when we find cowboy artifacts? We can’t take them, since they are protected – but you are out on the public lands, so what are the rules? What are the deeper ways of understanding surrounding how a gate was made? What does it tell you about how the workman understood his world?”

Most importantly, Gulliford believes the idea of giving back is the key thing his book contributes to outdoor literature. “We ‘take’ a hike, but what do we give back?” he asks.

In the last section, “Wilderness Tithing: Giving Back to Public Lands,” readers will find examples of people volunteering in the outdoors. The work of the Southwest Conservation Corps, the Adopt a Beach program in the Grand Canyon, and suggestions on how to advocate for wild lands in the context of global climate change are addressed.

Perhaps one of the most devoted local advocates for wild lands is Katrina Blair, whose entire life is a deep engagement with nature. Blair, a Durango native, founded Turtle Lake Refuge, an “organic farm school,” and engages in regular “walkabouts” in which she spends days in the wilderness eating only raw wild foods and drinking “wild” water. She leads plant walks, speaks at conferences around the country, teaches people how to prepare wild food, and is a living example of the grace and beauty of the natural world.

THE WILD WISDOM OF WEEDSHer book “The Wild Wisdom of Weeds: 13 Essential Plants for Human Survival” is nominated in the General Nonfiction category. Blair self-published a recipe book in 2009, “Local Wild Life: Turtle Lake Refuge’s Recipes for Living Deep,” which also provides a history of the Local Wild Life Café in Durango, a living food restaurant she established.

Blair had an idea for another book, which had to do with the important role some neglected plants play in facilitating human health. While she was mulling the idea, an editor from Chelsea Green Publishing contacted her. They specialize in sustainable-living books, publishing popular titles such as “The Straw Bale House” (Bainbridge & Steen) and “The Man Who Planted Trees” (Giono).

Blair was offered an advance, which she used to travel to the Arctic to see if the plants she was considering could be found there. “Which plants are most easily found in all countries?” she wondered. “They had to be edible first, and medicinal second.” She narrowed her choices to the 13 in the book, then spent over a year researching each plant.

“I was already in love with the plants,” she smiled, “but then I found myself becoming even more deeply engaged with each one.”

The book was a family effort. Her mother helped her edit, staying up all night with her during the week before the manuscript was due. Her father, the late Rob Blair, a long-time geosciences professor at Fort Lewis College and founder of the Mountain Studies Institute in Silverton, helped with the research.

The book has received rave reviews, ending up in the New York Times Sunday Book Review, and as one of Mother Earth News’ Notable New Books. Blair is somewhat surprised by all this attention.

But she’s happy for the support, because she believes in bridging perspectives. She’s talking about human survival, and how simple weeds have the capacity to help people become healthier and happier. “We’re a resource for each other. I love to interconnect, and open doors,” she said.

The book has taken on a life of its own, bringing her new opportunities to teach and be of service. “I’m in awe of it,” she said of the book. “It’s like a dandelion seed, going out into the world, doing its work.”

Blair plans to attend the awards ceremony in Aspen on June 21, mentioning that “it’s an honor to be a finalist.”

Guilliford agrees. “The whole idea that our corner of the state is generating high-quality writing and literature and the type of material that will engage people from all over the state and the country is exciting,” he said.

Published in June 2015 Tagged , ,

SWOS students create garden

Learning about irrigation, permaculture and ancient civilizations, Southwest Open School students toiled in the soil this spring to create a new school-based permaculture garden – built entirely of donated and re-purposed materials.

“Many school gardens in the area were developed with collaboration with other organizations such as Farm to School,” said Casey Simpson, Garden Committee member, in a release, “whereas the SWOS garden was built almost entirely by students, through donations – not through grants. So it’s a localized and student-led project, as opposed to having outside resources.”

Harnessing the SWOS tradition of expeditionary and hands-on learning, students are planting the “Three Sisters,” traditional crops cultivated by the Ancestral Puebloans thousands of years ago. Including corn, beans and squash, the Three Sisters are arranged to enrich the soil, provide shade and preserve moisture. The ancient cultivation techniques tie in to the SWOS Ancients class, which studies the Ancestral Puebloans.

The garden also incorporates more modern permaculture techniques and is the only school garden in the area to use of a swale, a soil embankment designed to capture moisture and runoff to create a self-sustaining ecosystem. Simpson said a permaculture approach requires less maintenance and is more sustainable.

“It’s a system of gardening that requires less work and works within the natural ecosystems within the region,” he said. “So you’re not out there trying to plant something that isn’t supposed to grow in the area. At the same time, you’re utilizing plant systems to enrich the soil that you’re growing in. Like the clover cover crops that add nitrogen to the soil and increase the production of your edible plants.”

The garden utilizes compost already being generated by the school. Simpson hopes vegetables grown in the garden will eventually be able to bolster school lunches, taken home by students and be donated to local food banks.

“Incorporating education about sustainable, regionally-appropriate gardening is what we’re trying to do here,” Simpson said. “We don’t want to plant a bunch of tomatoes that are going to die on the vine over the summer. We want to plant drought–resistant crops that have been historically successful growing in this region. And in doing so, teach students and/or all people with agricultural farming in their future, that there are ways to eat plentifully if you incorporate permaculture.”

Passionate about gardening, Simpson, Rita Stramel, Julie Birkle, and Tory Smith joined together early this year to form the SWOS Garden Committee. The plan was brought to life by this year’s SWOS Service Class, which incorporates service learning into projects to benefit the community.

Contributors to the project include Intermountain Farmers Association, Slavens True Value Hardware, Southwest Seed Inc., the City of Cortez Public Works Department, Mancos Seed Swap, Stone Gravel, Bob Curry of Permaculture Provision Project, Val Truelson, Colby Early, Patti Ledford and Amy Vasing.

Founded in 1986, Southwest Open School is a charter high school that uses an expeditionary and experiential approach to teaching and learning. Courses are designed to deeply investigate topics through projects, travel, community involvement and service.

For more information, contact Casey Simpson at: 970-232-6832.

Published in July 2015

Judge refuses to dismiss voting suit

A lawsuit filed by the Navajo Nation in January 2012 over voting districts in San Juan County, Utah, is moving forward after a federal judge rejected a motion by the county to dismiss the suit.

In a ruling in March, U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby said the Navajo Nation had provided enough facts to support a plausible claim against the county. His ruling does not mean the Navajos would prevail, only that the case could continue.

The lawsuit stems from disagreements over how the county commissioners are chosen in the sprawling, 7933-squaremile county in the southeastern corner of Utah.

San Juan County is the only county in the state to elect its commissioners through a by-district vote rather than at large. The system was the result of a 1984 settlement agreement developed in response to a lawsuit by the U.S. Department of Justice, which had charged that the at-large system diluted the voting strength of Native Americans.

After the county began voting by district in 1984, Mark Maryboy became the first Navajo elected to the county commission, representing the newly created, predominantly Navajo District 3, which includes the communities of Aneth and Montezuma Creek, and the Red Mesa chapters.

Since that time, there have always been two Caucasian county commissioners and one Native American, according to information in court documents.

But after the 2010 census – which found that non-Hispanic whites constituted approximately 46 percent of the county’s population – the Navajos sought to have the districts redrawn. They argued that Native Americans made up roughly 52 percent of the county’s total population and that it was unfair that they were all “packed” into a single district, because this meant there would never be more than a single Native American on the county commission.

According to the complaint filed by the Navajos, District 1 of the county encompasses 5,347 people and is roughly 30 percent Native American; District 2 has 4,550 people and is 29 percent Native American; and District 3 has 4,949 people, 93 percent Native American.

In November 2011, the county commissioners took up the issue of redistricting, but voted 2-1 (with Kenneth Maryboy dissenting) to tweak the boundaries of the two white-majority districts while leaving District 3 as is. They ignored a reapportionment plan suggested by the Navajo Nation.

The Navajos then filed suit.

The county had asked for dismissal of the Navajos’ claims alleging violations of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and of the Voting Rights Act. The county argued that the court did not have jurisdiction to alter the 1984 settlement because it had been agreed to by the county and the federal government and was essentially a contract that could not be changed.

However, Shelby rejected this argument, saying the Navajos were not a party to the settlement and thus were allowed to challenge it. He also stated that they were not seeking to change the substance of the settlement, which established the single-member voting districts but did not draw the boundaries.

“When the court found in 1984 that the ‘process leading to the selection of county commissioners in San Juan County, Utah’ violated the Voting Rights Act, this meant that a system based on at-large districts impermissibly blocked Native American voters from appropriate representation, specifically by denying rights to a then-minority Native American population,” wrote Shelby.

“Navajo Nation in this suit claims that a subsequent system of single-member election districts has denied rights to a majority Native American population, based on boundaries last altered in 2011 – 27 years after the Settlement was adopted in 1984. The difference between the subject and purpose of the two suits is clear.”

Shelby said the county’s arguments were “at odds with its own prior conduct” because if altering election-district boundaries “is permissible only through the original litigation, then it is unclear how the Commission could have redrawn its boundaries in 2011 without first obtaining permission from the original court.”

San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman told the Free Press that the matter was in the hands of the county’s lawyers and that the issue would be decided in court.

The parties are now in the process of filing various motions and designating experts to testify. According to a scheduling order filed by the court, the case could stretch on well into 2016.

 

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Connecting carrots with consumers: Southwest Farm Fresh Cooperative offers a necessary link in a chain

SOUTHWEST FARM FRESH COOPERATIVE

A tray of Wiley Carrot micro-greens ready for harvest and delivery to gourmet restaurants in Telluride. Courtesy photo

The wholesale link to a sustainable food-distribution market has always been the trickiest piece in the puzzle of commercial agriculture. It’s the piece that adds cost to the product – the “middle man” in conventional, corporate-controlled consumer models.

Wholesale markets can increase the amount of purchases, but in agriculture and ranching, the profitability of perishable goods is completely dependent on timely harvest, packaging and delivery. The costly infrastructure that supports any food-distribution system is proportionately more expensive for the small-scale, individual farmer growing food for localized specialty markets like farm-to- table cuisine.

Ironically, regional farmers have no affordable distribution model to work with, yet they are the closest source to the highest-quality local food and sustainable agricultural practices today.

The Southwest Farm Fresh Cooperative, a group of 20 local farmers in Southwest Colorado, is working to re-connect consumers to the food resources in their own back yard as local food-distribution systems did in the past, before consolidated food production and supermarket consumerism contributed to their disappearance.

“The network supporting our local food system did exist in this rural community a long time ago, but it has gone by the wayside,” said Kim Lindgren, president of the year-old cooperative. “Essentially, what we are resurrecting is the local infrastructure that worked for the local farmer and the customers at a local food store. Both were squashed by the consolidation market.”

Lindgren, owner of Red Canyon Farms in McElmo Canyon west of Cortez, is one of the founding members of the cooperative, which organized in March 2014. She estimates it will take five years to rebuild what has been lost. “Today, it costs a ton of money to rebuild and implement that distribution link to the markets, but that is our goal.”

A cooperative plan

A year ago, Mancos resident Ole Bye presented the farmers with the co-op idea after he tried on his own to create an independent distribution business. His business, Local Food Logic, had a delivery truck and a coterie of budding wholesale contacts. What was needed to make it work for the farmers, the distributor and the wholesale clientele was a cooperative organizational structure.

Bye presented the farmers with a for-profit model that provided refrigerated storage and pick-up equipment at points of harvest to enable farmers to connect their locally sourced produce to the wholesale markets.

“He urged the growing community to establish a board of directors and incorporate,” explained Lindgren. “His concept was something we could support and he had the experience. We did all the incorporating structural work, and then Livewell Montezuma, [a Colorado project that invests communities in healthy living] had funds to put toward the co-op on the ground level, so we organized around the map he created that showed how this could work.

“It’s something to say that all the farmers are willing to work together, a very professional approach.” The delivery distances to high-end wholesale restaurant clients in Telluride, Durango and Cortez create a need for reliable equipment that can transport the produce from the farms. Fresh produce must reach the client before its quality deteriorates.

It was a natural fit for the farmers, Bye and the clientele to come together and form their business based on a plan created around the challenges facing farmers located mostly in Montezuma County. Bye said the approach to their venture is based on conservative, considered steps. Because this is a for-profit venture, the grants available to them are very slim.

But last year the co-op applied for an award from the USDA Local Food Promotion Program, which was open to for-profit businesses. The award provided $70,000 to be used for a mobile office trailer, a walk-in cooler and three refrigerated cargo trailers.

This equipment is the basis of the distribution infrastructure. Individual farmers are rarely able to afford such expensive equipment, but collectively the co-op can pool efforts to break down the barriers created by economics, time and distance. It becomes feasible for local farmers to fill the orders they receive because the perishable produce can be transported in the refrigerated cargo trailers and delivered to clients within a workable time frame.

No rural models

Many distribution models have worked in urban areas, but none of them fit a rural region such as ours, Lindgren explained. “We may be developing the first. It’s really something to say that all the farmers in the food co-op are willing to work together, a very professional approach.”

Bye described the far-ranging network of farms to food markets as “very challenging. The point is, we are owned by the member farmers who each have a little equity in the business and it’s our mission to support the viability of the member farms. We are one year old and have identified it’s the high-end market that will support our products and the co-op.”

Although the group is not qualified for not-for-profit grants, many not-for-profits seeking the benefits of nutritious locally sourced food can apply for grants that will fund their association as a client of the co-op, as did Livewell Montezuma last year.

Kitchens in schools and hospitals, Farm to Table, Head Start programs, and senior centers are gradually signing on as co-op customers.

“We had a terrific first year – a 47 percent increase in sales over projected gross revenues,” Lindgren said.

That may be due, in part, to the demand for fresh local meats and produce growing out of the high-end gourmet restaurants in resorts such as Telluride.

“The restaurants in Cortez are a good example,” she explained. “They have all really done a great job supporting us in this, as well as the awesome customers in Durango and Telluride, all of them part of the 25 or more wholesale accounts we now have, and we are expecting more this season.”

Thriving micro-greens

The Wiley Carrot, a five-year-old farm in Mancos, is owned by farmer Kellie Pettyjohn, a member of the co-op. She’s enthusiastic about school involvement in the wholesale end of the co-op business, especially the Montezuma School to Farm project that wrote the co-op into one of their grants last year. “It’s a great example of collaboration. We are excited about the orders coming from the growing number of school cafeteria directors in Mancos, Ignacio, Bayfield, Cortez and Durango. It’s a bid process. We must be competitive yet the process is working. “

Her farm does not grow as many carrots As the name implies. “I was growing a lot more carrots when I named my farm. Today I only grow about 500 pounds per year. I’ve replaced them with micro-green produce. I just liked the name ‘The Wiley Carrot,’ the energy in it, but I am really focused on the micro- green market now.

“I have two acres in production and four high tunnel houses. The microgreens are grown in the hoop houses where they are protected.”

Pettyjohn said the conversion to the co-op made sense to her because she couldn’t get to the wholesale markets on her own.

Today her micro-green crop is thriving because she has the resources of the co-op to help her get the greens to her gourmet-restaurant clientele in Telluride.

During high season at The Wiley Carrot, she estimates she produces about 200 pounds of micro-greens per week. “The volume in the wholesale market is very important to me. I’d like to sell more in the direct-sales market, at the farmers market, for instance, but the micro-greens are a little more difficult, because I have to educate people about them, how to cook with them, why they are nutritious.”

The working crew she brings in to help her harvest is mostly women. They harvest, clean and package the produce. Some of them have returned every year, she said, and many of them do piece work at a couple of other farms in Mancos.

Teamwork ripples through the culture.

“The younger farmer group is like a ‘crew of growers,’ all of us willing to work together,” Pettyjohn said. “They come to the community here with very different backgrounds, few of them with prior experience in farming or ag education.”

Pettyjohn has degrees in anthropology and journalism as well as a graduate degree in geography. “Obviously, I hoped to travel the world and write about my experiences, but I came here for one season of farming, like many of us did, and stayed. It’s a choice we are making.”

Consumer choice

Direct sales to consumers is a market the co-op farms hope to develop, but costs are high and profits are risky. Lindgren describes the desire everyone has to open “a luscious storefront where the customer could just walk in and pick up what they want at any time, and there are a lot of people in Montezuma County. Everyone that eats food should be able to buy it from us that way. Maybe we’ll get there, but first we need to develop a direct-sales model that is manageable and profitable and the infrastructure to support it.”

Another grant awarded to the group this year earmarked $10,000 to a direct sales pilot program specifically funding a part-time marketing/coordinating position and the development of an on-line ordering procedure.

According to Lindgren, the co-op has to begin direct sales in the greatest concentration of people, “because we’re for-profit,” she said. “In this case, Durango will be our first because it has the densest population and may be the easiest to develop as a model.”

Bye said if the program works in Durango, “we’ll bring the model west to Montezuma County.”

“People are excited about the consumer’s ability to order on-line and the opportunity it will bring for small farms in our region. In our process you’ll be able to see what’s available and what you want.

“To complete the links in distribution we need a go-to pick-up place and that location, that system, has to work for the co-op as well.”

Published in June 2015

An alphabet soup of ideas: A new SMA plan joins the mix of public-lands proposals in San Juan County

SAN JUAN COUNTY COMISSIONER PHIL LYMAN

Commissioner Phil Lyman listens to a constituent during a county lands council meeting in Blanding where the stakeholders were hopeful they could reach consensus on a proposal for federal land designations in San Juan County. Photo by Sonja Horoshko.

A new plan has been added to the plethora of alternatives being considered by San Juan County, Utah, for managing federal public lands in the county.

The new plan calls for designating a 2-million-acre special management area in the county. It was introduced at a meeting of the county Lands Council on May 11.

It represents the latest response to the process that began in October 2013 when Utah Congressmen Rob Bishop and Jason Chaffetz, both Republicans, invited the commissioners in eight eastern Utah counties to survey their constituents regarding their interest in participating in the Utah Public Lands Initiative. The goal of the initiative is to come up with a package of management proposals for the vast swaths of scenic and resource-rich federal lands within the counties that would provide an alternative to the designation of a national monument by President Obama.

Since then, various counties have met with various stakeholders and come up with proposals, but San Juan County is still struggling to reach agreement on its plan.

The concept of the new SMA “was developed by the staff of the congressional delegation,” San Juan County planner Nick Sandberg told the Free Press.

Fred Ferguson, lead staff person for the Public Lands Initiative and chief of staff for Chaffetz, said in an email that “the SMA concept has been discussed, but not formally offered. The concept may or may not have legs down the road. It’s just an early discussion idea.” It is being looked at as an additional option to the existing alternatives that could offer some protection of cultural resources while also supporting economic- development opportunities for the stakeholders in the county.

An NCA proposal

The commissioners have made it clear in public statements that they want the Lands Council, composed of 14 appointed citizens from all parts of the county, to seriously consider all submissions as they seek to craft a land management proposal that best fits the needs of San Juan County citizens.

“We entered the process in good faith, appointed a citizens advisory committee,” said Commissioner Phil Lyman, who serves on the committee. “They started back in January 2014 and met through the year during more than 20 meetings to date, and many more recently with representatives of Diné Bikéyah and Ute Mountain Ute. We asked for their representation all along, but there was little involvement up until the end.”

Diné Bikéyah is a San Juan County-based Navajo group organized to develop a plan that represents the Navajo Nation’s interests in the initiative. Diné Bikeyah’s plan calls for the creation of the Bear’s Ears National Conservation Area. It is backed by Navajo Nation Council legislation and has been presented to Bishop and Chaffetz as well as to the county.

The NCA proposal would allow for traditional uses of the land such as holding ceremonies and gathering herbs and firewood, while also protecting sacred, cultural and archeological sites. It also calls for an increased and substantial management role for Native tribes who have a deep, historical relationship to the land in question.

Support for the Bear’s Ears NCA has grown into an organized coalition of 24 tribes/pueblos and five conservation groups. (See Free Press, May 2015.)

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Plight of the pollinators: From monarchs to honey bees, the helpful insects are in decline

MONARCH BUTTERFLIES IN DECLINE

Monarch butterflies have experienced losses of approximately 90 percent of their populations in recent years. Tina Shaw/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Gardening takes faith.

It’s a faith that Ric Plese, local horticulturist and owner of Cliffrose Garden Center and Gifts in Cortez, has been cultivating in his customers for 16 years and counting. Faith that it will rain, and that it won’t snow. Faith that the sun will shine, but not too hot, and that the growing season will last long enough for plants to bear fruit. A belief that seeds will germinate, that the soil is proper, and that pollinators will show up.

But lately pollinators have been showing up to farms and gardens across the United States in fewer and fewer numbers. The decline is so pronounced that the Obama administration recently issued what was dubbed an “all hands on deck” call to ensuring future pollinator health. The administration plans to help armies of bees, butterflies, moths, bats, birds, beetles and any number of other crawling or winged creatures seeking fresh blooms and foliage through direct action, research and partnerships. The National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators, created by the Pollinator Health Task Force, a group appointed by President Obama last June, was released by the administration on May 19.

The lengthy document calls for dedicating the highest levels of the American government to reversing devastating domestic honey-bee colony losses, increasing monarch populations before the butterfly goes extinct across America, and restoring or enhancing 7 million acres of land over the next five years to benefit pollinators.

Here in Cortez, Plese hasn’t seen the recent declines in pollinators affecting his plants. “I know people who have bee colonies and that they have their declines,” Plese said in a recent phone conversation. “But on my nursery stock, it’s insane all the things buzzing around – when I see what’s on the flowers.” He noted that pesticides are not used at Cliffrose, and speculated that maybe his greenhouses are a sanctuary for local pollinators.

“Society needs to change,” Plese said. “One little patch in Montezuma County isn’t going to help the whole species.” He points to corporate agriculture’s vast monoculture fields of corn and soybean, liberally doused with pesticides, as the real issue. But he also believes that whatever homeowners can do to help will make a difference.

Now may be the time to make a difference for monarch butterflies. The large, beloved insects with orange, black and white wings found throughout North America have experienced a sustained population decrease of approximately 90 percent in recent years, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The decline is so steep that the service is in the middle of a one-year review that will determine whether the monarch, and its critical habitat, will receive protection under the Endangered Species Act.

The monarch’s quirky penchant for travel sets it apart from other butterflies – and puts it at risk. According to the U.S. Forest Service, the monarch is the only butterfly known to make a birdlike two-way migration. A single generation of monarchs travels across the eastern United States, flying up to 3,000 miles and coming from as far north as Eastern Canada. They arrive en masse in the oyamel fir forests of the Sierra Madre Mountains in Michoacan, Mexico, northwest of Mexico City, in late October and stay for the winter. Their numbers are so great that their population is not counted in butterflies, but in the number of acres that they literally blanket, roosting together in trees for warmth.

This same generation of butterflies gets the traveling itch around February. After mating in Mexico, they head back north to lay their eggs on milkweed plants, the sole source of food for their larvae — very hungry, yellow-black-and-white- striped caterpillars.

Other butterfly species can survive a winter in the United States’ cold northern climates, either as caterpillars, cocooned chrysalises, or even as butterflies. Monarchs cannot – they must migrate or die – and their little-understood though much-studied migratory feat only adds to their appeal.

To add another complexity to their particular ways, several generations of monarchs complete the journey north in the spring. These successive generations live a mere two to five weeks, compared to the winter set’s longevity of nine months. Each generation is compelled to find flower nectar for food and stands of milkweed for egg-laying and caterpillar nurseries, or the links in the great monarch migration are broken.

In the western United States, a similar, but shorter migration takes place between the Rocky Mountains and the sunny environs of Southern California. The Four Corners region bisects the eastern and western migration routes. The western monarch population has experienced the smallest decline, although the decrease in local monarch populations is still pronounced.

“I have not seen a living monarch in at least 10 years,” said Deborah Kendall, a doctorate professor of entomology at Fort Lewis College. “In the past, monarchs would migrate through our local habitats from overwintering habitats in Mexico and Central America. They would follow the progressive milkweed flowering times as they migrated northward.”

Kendall said monarchs are extremely rare due to both habitat destruction and the spraying of herbicides on their host plant, the milkweed. Enormous populations have been destroyed in their overwintering sites in Mexico and additional habitat has been lost because of insufficient regulation of monarch habitat and pesticide application, especially on crops.

The president’s pollinator strategy plan agrees, citing the primary stressors as the loss of milkweed breeding habitat in corn and soybean fields, the loss of breeding habitat due to development, illegal logging and deforestation at overwintering sites, and extreme weather conditions that drop the temperature or humidity below what monarchs can endure.

In addition, diseases, parasites, and predators, such as assassin bugs that attack caterpillars like vampires, piercing them with their sharp beaks and sucking out their body liquids, all contribute to population declines. Even a few species of birds can tolerate the high levels of poisonous cardenolides found in the butterflies and caterpillars, a toxin in the milkweed that caterpillars eat. These birds can quickly reduce monarch populations.

Farmers, ranchers and homeowners also contribute to population decline when they use insecticides.

Although the harm done to pollinators by pesticides in general, and neonicotinoids specifically, is addressed in the plan put forth by the Obama administration, the plan calls for further study instead of direct action. Neonicotiniod pesticides protect plants against insects that would like to eat them, when the poison is applied to the seed, roots, or other part of the plant, and the plant spreads it to all areas, including leaves, nectar and pollen. Neonicotinoids are more toxic to insects than to mammals, and were thought to be a safe way to prevent pests. However, published studies have shown that neonicotinoids can be a deadly neurotoxin to bees and that bees are sensitive to prolonged exposure.

The president’s strategy cites the critical role pesticides play in no-till agricultural, invasive-species control, and in suppressing insects that transmit human diseases or kill crops. The document also claims “it is the misuse and overuse of these pesticides that leads to adverse ecological and human health consequences.”

But not everyone shares this view. In response to the President’s plan, Lisa Archer, Food and Technology Program Director at Friends of the Earth, said in a statement, “Four million Americans have called on the Obama administration to listen to the clear science demanding that immediate action be taken to suspend systemic bee-killing pesticides, including seed treatments.” Lending a hand to monarchs, and other butterflies that are more commonly found in our region such as the tiger swallowtail, mourning cloak, painted lady, juniper hairstreak, sulphur and cabbage white, can be as easy as growing milkweed and forgoing pesticides and herbicides. “Flat flowers attract butterflies,” Plese said.

Plese sells three varieties of native milkweed in pots and four varieties of seeds for planting at his greenhouse. Four Seasons Greenhouse in Dolores has already sold all of their butterfly milkweed for the summer.

Several varieties of the plant will grow locally and will sustain monarchs and many other pollinators. Plese said that the perennials take full sun and can be planted in versatile soil, but can be killed by overwatering. He noted that milkweeds have other benefits: they are deer resistant, have fragrant delicate blooms that make cut flowers for decorative use, and grow up to 3 feet tall, adding variety to a flower garden.

To attract additional local pollinators, such as domestic honey bees and their wild and native counterparts, such as bumble bees, leaf-cutter bees, sweat bees, and several fly species that resemble bees, such as syrphid flies and bee flies, Plese recommends leaving dandelions alone, and planting nectar-rich flowers such as Russian sage or blue spirea. “Bees just love it! They [the blue spirea] are just loaded with bees. The bees are so inebriated with the nectar that they aren’t a nuisance.”

Although it is already June, Plese said it’s not too late to plant. “People think you can only plant in the spring. With containerized plants you can plant all year long.”

To learn more about monarch butterflies and other pollinators, visit Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation at www.xerces.org.

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Judge: Sinclair can remove ‘Dino’ from Mancos site

 

SINCLAIR MCCARTY DISPUTE

The juxtaposition of Sinclair’s trademark “Dino” sign with banners warning of toxic contamination
at a former convenience store west of Mancos was the subject of a hearing in District Court in
May.

Dino, the endearing baby dinosaur that has long been the Jurassic-era promoter of Sinclair gasoline, may soon disappear from one of Montezuma County’s most notorious landmarks.

Visiting District Judge David Lass ruled May 15 that the Sinclair sign is the personal property of the parent company, rejecting arguments by the property owners, Ray and Sandra McCarty, that it belongs to them.

Perched atop the towering canopy of a defunct convenience store on U.S. Highway 160 near Mesa Verde National Park, the diminutive green sauropod on the “Sinclair” sign presently overlooks another, bright orange billboard adorned with skull-and crossbones flags that declares the area a “Massive petroleum spill/toxic site.”

Yet another billboard states, “This toxic mess is brought to you by the state of Colorado.” Other grim messages are scattered around the property as well.

McCarty, who posted the dire warnings in recent years to call attention to the dilapidated structure, has been engaged in a lengthy legal battle over what he maintains is widespread property damage that occurred after the store closed in 2004.

He claims that “thousands of gallons” of fuel were spilled during an inept tank removal process in 2006, according to a 2013 Cortez Journal article, and that the resultant groundwater contamination was then exacerbated by an effort to measure its extent.

But this was disputed — as was the amount of any pollution that may have occurred — by Souter, Miller and Associates, an engineering firm hired by Fraley and Company, at the time the local Sinclair distributor. McCarty also accused the engineering firm of trespassing on his land to drill numerous test wells.

In 2012, McCarty, represented by attorney James Preston, unsuccessfully sought $1.7 million in damages from SMA, but was awarded just $1 by a federal court jury. The jury decided that the firm did trespass, since no written permission to do the work was given by McCarty, but was not convinced he suffered extensive financial loss or that great environmental damage had resulted from the drilling. Other serpentine legal maneuvers involving the extent of alleged damage continue, however, with McCarty representing himself and his wife.

The contentious property owner has also rejected a state regulatory agency’s proposed plan of correction, which would be done without cost to him, and denied further access to the property.

McCarty delivered a protracted presentation to the Montezuma County Commission last year during which he charged that the contamination had caused his daughter to become seriously ill and rendered the property worthless.

In an effort to disassociate itself from the flap, Sinclair argued in court in May that the proximity of its sign to those erected by McCarty causes passing motorists to form a negative impression of the company, thus harming the brand.

Lynn Hart, a company vice president, said his duties include monitoring the familiar silhouette to see that it isn’t disparaged or exploited.

“It’s all about the trademark – the green-colored dinosaur,” Hunt said. “We’re concerned about the juxtaposition of the two [signs].

“I’m sure people are perplexed — ‘Does Sinclair have anything to do with the skull and crossbones?’ We believe Sinclair has been damaged.”

It is standard practice for Sinclair to retrieve its signs when a location goes out of business, he said, and dealers are never allowed to retain them.

“This is one in a million – I’ve never seen anything like this.”

But McCarty responded that the sign, which has been on his property for 21 years, belongs to him. He argued that if the sign was considered the property of Sinclair, the company should compensate him for two decades of advertising.

He also tried to offer into evidence eBay listings of other antique Sinclair memorabilia for sale, maintaining that for the company to try to reclaim the sign at this point would be like the owner of a Red Ryder B-B gun being asked by sidekick Little Beaver to give it back, or Budweiser asking for its empty beer cans to be returned.

Although obviously amused, Lass rejected this argument and warned McCarty repeatedly to focus on the matter at issue: to whom this particular sign belongs.

Following the testimony, Lass issued a preliminary ruling giving Sinclair Corporation, as owner of the trademark, permission to remove its personal property – i.e., the sheet-metal Sinclair banner wrapped around the canopy. Lass said the company would need to reach an agreement with the Montezuma County Sheriff ’s Office and, most likely, a contractor to do the actual work.

McCarty was given 10 days to respond to the ruling and filed an answer May 22 that maintained the statute of limitations on recovering the property has expired, and requesting a jury trial on the matter.

Published in June 2015

Debate continues over lands-transfer concept

The idea of transferring public lands from the federal government to the states remains a hot topic in Montezuma County.

Ever since the county commissioners voted in March to give $1,000 to the Utah-based American Lands Council, a group that lobbies for the transfer, the issue has been discussed at commission meetings and in other venues.

On May 18, at a meeting of the local 9-12 Project, a state senator from Montana made the case for transferring ownership of multiple-use lands to the states. Addressing a crowd of about three dozen, guest speaker Jennifer Fielder, a Republican, maintained states would be better at managing national forests and Bureau of Land Management lands within their borders because they’re closer to the lands and have a greater interest in their management.

Fielder is a volunteer with the American Lands Council, a group that has sparked some controversy for its fundraising across the West.

According to High Country News, in 2013, the non-profit brought in approximately $200,000 in contributions, $134,000 of which came from county memberships. In the same year, HCN reported, 50 percent of the lands council’s revenues went to pay salaries for founder Ken Ivory, a Utah state legislator, and his wife. (See full story at https://fourcornersfreepress.com/?p=2544)

Fielder said she supports the lands transfer because “it is the only solution big enough” to address problems regarding public-lands management.

Worried about beetle kills, wildfires, invasive species, access restrictions and watershed degradations, many Western states have passed legislation either supporting the transfer or advocating that the idea be studied.

Fielder said a survey was conducted in Montana of every county that had at least 15 percent of its acreage under federal control. Of the 28 counties that responded, 96 percent said they were experiencing severe wildfire conditions on federal lands, 79 percent said important habitat was at risk on federal lands, and 62 percent said air quality in their county fell below acceptable health standards because of smoke from wildfires.

Ninety-one percent said PILT (Payments in Lieu of Taxes) monies, which are given to counties with federal lands, were not equal to taxable land values.

“If resources were managed correctly we would get more value off the land,” Fielder said.

Ninety-six percent said motorized access was important for sustenance activities such as mushroom-gathering, hunting, trapping, firewood-collecting and berry-picking. None of the counties wanted to see fewer multiple-use access routes on federal lands, Fielder said, yet BLM and Forest Service land-management plans are reducing access.

“In some places it makes sense to close down some access, but we’re seeing widespread closures for reasons that don’t make sense,” she said.

She said she doesn’t necessarily blame employees of the agencies, because they are seeing budget cuts and much of their money goes to fighting fires and lawsuits. “In some cases 80 to 90 percent [of their budget] goes to those two items,” she said. “Only 10 percent is left for managing resources. It is a real conundrum for the people trying to do their job.”

She blamed decreased logging for increased wildfires and said the states would allow much-more-streamlined timber production.

The only solution, she said, is to transfer management to the states.

“The people that live there are more interested in seeing better management than the people in New Jersey,” she said.

Concerns have arisen that states would sell some of the transferred lands, she said, but this could be precluded by legislation forbidding it. She introduced such legislation in Montana, she said, but ultimately it failed because of opposition from environmentalists.

Throughout the history of the United States, millions of acres have been transferred to state control already, she said. Lands were transferred in the East, where most states have very little federally controlled land.

Also, she noted, “It’s where state trust lands come from.”

Advocates of the transfer cite the “Property Clause” of the U.S. Constitution, which states: “The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.”

They say the phrase “dispose of ” indicates the federal lands were always intended to be transferred, not retained.

Fielder said national parks, wilderness areas, Indian reservations and military installations would not be included in the transfer.

Audience member Bud Garner asked why those lands should be excluded. “If there is a constitutional argument, then there has to be a complete constitutional argument,” he said.

“We don’t want the opposition saying, ‘They’re going to take our wilderness areas or national parks’,” Fielder said. “They are very popular.” When Garner pressed the question, she said excluding parks and wilderness areas was a necessary political compromise.

Audience member Dave Sokol asked whether the transferred lands could be leased by states rather than sold outright, possibly for purposes such as strip-mining that would render them useless for recreation. Sokol cited the case of the Christmas Mountains in Texas. In 1991, a foundation donated a 9,200-acre tract in the Christmas Mountains to the state, which was to preserve it and keep it forever wild. However, the commissioner of the Texas General Land Office decided it would be better to sell the tract because the state could not afford to protect the land from poachers and replenish its wildlife. After a protracted battle, in 2011 the land was put under the control of the Texas State University System.

“The state trust lands are to be managed for the highest and best use and they are managed to maximize proceeds,” Fielder responded. “The movement we’re working on now isn’t to take the land and put it in state-trust-land status.” She said the idea was to “manage it better but allow it to be open,” but did not directly address the leasing issue.

The transfer question had also come up at the Montezuma County Commission meeting earlier on May 18.

During public comments, local resident Matt Clark, who said he was speaking on behalf of himself and friends who are backcountry hunters and anglers, worried about impacts to access if public lands were transferred. He said the way the state manages lands is “way different” because their highest goal is economic benefit and the state doesn’t have the resources that the federal government does for managing lands.

Commissioner Larry Don Suckla said the Forest Service and BLM combined have an annual budget of $3 million in the local area even though the federal government receives $30 million a year in mineral royalties from within the county. Clark said that was not entirely true because other factors make the budget much larger, including funds spent on fire suppression.

Commissioner Keenan Ertel said if the lands were managed better there wouldn’t be the need for so much fire suppression.

Clark said he believes there would be a greater chance of privatization if the lands were managed by the state.

Another local, Sam Carter, also told the board he opposes the transfer. “I appreciate the way the feds take care of the land and I would like to see things stay the way they are,” he said. He said it’s important that the commissioners reach out to everyone in the community before taking a stance on the transfer.

He spoke about the commission’s decision to spend $1,000 to join the American Lands Council. “You should do a survey and talk to all of us before you make a decision like that,” he said. “You only talked to the people who put you into office.”

Suckla said 219 counties have joined the lands council.

Citizen Dave Dove then spoke in favor of the transfer, saying opponents were not speaking the truth. “The feds do a terrible job,” he said.

M.B. McAfee told the board the commission should organize focus groups and try to hear a diversity of opinions from different citizens.

Later, the commissiioners asked Derek Padilla, district manager for the Dolores District of the San Juan National Forest, his views on the transfer. He said he could not advocate for any position, but said he’d talked to a sportsman who comes to Colorado to hunt because there is no public-lands access in Texas because it is “basically all private property.” Only about 5 percent of Texas land is publicly owned. Padilla said a few road closures here did not make the situation comparable to the East, where there is much less public land. He said an Arkansas man told him that, given the choice, he’d rather deal with the public-lands status in the Western states than have no public land at all.

David Long contributed to this report.

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Let it fly no more

Just stop it.

Stop defending the state-sanctioned display of the “Confederate” flag on public buildings/grounds where the public’s business is conducted and where the public’s representatives meet.

Note that I said “state-sanctioned” and “public buildings.” I couldn’t care less if individuals want to display the flag in their yard, on their vehicle, or on their apparel. They’ve the right. And I have the right to make certain assumptions about them as a result. You might guess that these are not flattering assumptions, just as I might guess their opinion of me. I don’t care about that, either.

But the “Confederate” flag in modern-day America represents the legacy of racism and unjustified revolt, and its continued display shocks the conscience.

It was an outrage before a disaffected domestic terrorist — who allegedly stated that he wanted to start a race war — slaughtered nine innocent black worshippers in their church in June; it remains outrageous now.

The mass murder at a Charleston, S.C. church sparked much day-after agonizing about guns, race, and some media’s contortions to avoid substantively discussing either issue. It also led some survivors to forgive the alleged shooter, Dylann Roof, which gives hope for the human spirit.

The terrorism in Charleston has also brought the “Confederate” flag back into public discussion, with some calling for South Carolina to remove it from official locations. To his great credit, Mitt Romney is among those calling for the flag’s removal. Presidential hopeful Lindsey Graham has at least acknowledged it is a debate worth having.

Separately, and before the massacre, Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sided with the majority in Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of the Confederate Veterans, Inc. The gist of the ruling: Texas may refuse to issue a specialty license plate bearing an image of the Confederate flag.

Thomas is an African American, but his tenure on the bench is replete with rulings that have favored institutional racism; it cannot be argued that he ruled against the Sons of the Confederacy because of his own skin color. Instead, I take the ruling to mean that no state is required to be involved in producing a racist image on official objects, irrespective of whether the petitioners themselves view the image as racist.

Now, no credible argument is being made blaming the flag itself for Roof ’s alleged actions. Rather, the argument (I would say fact) is that the flag represents a heritage of racism that Roof embraced. Pictures purporting to be of Roof show him holding the Confederate flag and wearing pro- Apartheid patches on his clothing. Another shows him burning the U.S. flag. And there are his alleged statements about race war, and the absurdly medieval declaration that “you” (black people) “rape women,” “are taking over our country,” and so, must go.

Flag defenders would argue Roof misappropriated the symbol. My argument is the symbol is one of racism, as well as treason. It is the height of irony that some people who fly that flag would consider themselves, not just “good” Americans, but “the real” Americans.

Objections to my view are myriad. But they are not persuasive. • “It’s not the Confederate flag!”

It is true the Confederacy had several iterations of the flag and that one was a “battle flag.” But this makes no meaningful difference today. Further, the flag was used to varying degrees by white supremacists before Dylann Root. To argue that the flag does not bear the taint of racism, and means nothing untoward, is simply incorrect.

This flag is not just one of many harmless symbols like those held dear by a host of groups and individuals. We’re not talking about the Easter Bunny. We’re not talking about anything that does not celebrate the systemic oppression of African Americans, which is precisely what the “Confederate” flag does. Apples and oranges do not lemonade make.

• “It doesn’t represent treason – the Southern states left the Union!”

Those states revolted, precipitating years of exceptionally bloody violence and devastation (which did occur on both sides). Those states were fighting for their “right” to own other human beings as goods, chattel, workhorses and brood mares. I don’t care what kind of gloss apologists would put on that, nope, not even …

• “The war was about economics!”

Just about any war is in part (or even wholly) driven by economics. An economy- driven desire for more land for Europe’s elite played its part in the Crusades — yet it would be absurd to insist that these were a series of “economic” wars, not religious ones. Further, upon what was Southern (and even Northern) economy at the time of the Civil War based? The backs of slaves and their free labor.

• “The flag represents pride/heritage/ respect for the soldiers who fought for it!”

First, pride in what? The wholesale subjugation of an entire race for white convenience? Um, that’s not a source of pride. It is one of shame.

What heritage? The South wasn’t fighting to hold a cotillion, or the right to bake pecan pie. While we should respect the humanity of everyone in that war (and acknowledge how horrifically Southern war prisoners were treated, as well as the North’s own racism, including Lincoln’s), we do not have to respect what Southern leaders were doing, or why they did it, because the “what” and the “why” are reprehensible.

It is entirely possible to be proud of the South’s many legitimate and ongoing achievements without celebrating this particular flag. Acknowledging what the flag is does not diminish the good things about the South; it just recognizes that it is time to separate the good from the bad and retire this terrible relic. Anyone who thinks he or she cannot celebrate that which is good and wholesome about the South without the Confederate flag should perhaps create a new banner, one that is free of any Confederate influence.

The faulty logic invoked in defending the Confederate flag as a symbol of respect for the South’s soldiers can be illustrated through the following hyperbole: “Berlin ought to fly a swastika for all those SS soldiers, because, hey — they were just people and fighting for their way of life! It’s just respect!”

No, I do not suggest that every “Confederate” flag aficionado is a Nazi, or that Germany ought to do anything of the kind. (Look up “hyperbole” if you’re confused on this point; it means exaggeration for effect.) But Nazi Germany was the 20th century’s most prominent and worst example of blatant racism; it preached “Aryan” supremacy, much as the American establishment preached white supremacy from the days of slavery, to Jim Crow and beyond. For achingly obvious reasons, Berlin will not fly a swastika and for equally obvious reasons, no state should fly the rebel flag.

Returning to Dylann Roof: I don’t know what it is that drives people of the privileged sex, the privileged race, in a privileged nation to feel so disenfranchised that they believe they have the right to harm others. But we’d best figure it out before more disaffected lunatics kill more innocent people. Part of that involves sending a clear message: racism, whether individual or institutional, is evil and its symbols are not worthy of defense.

Katharhynn Heidelberg is an award-winning career journalist in Montrose, Colo.

Published in Katharhynn Heidelberg

County files for injunction against Bong-a-thon

By David Long

It’s a major bummer for some, but a drug-free high for opponents.

On Friday, July 10, Montezuma County filed a complaint in District Court seeking a temporary injunction against three men associated with what has been billed as “the 32nd annual Colorado Invitational Bong-a-thon.”

Perhaps in response, organizers posted on one of their Facebook pages, “Yeah, were not going to Montezuma. We didnt need one there either, but we are courteous enough to ask for one.”

The competitive marijuana-smoking festival was scheduled for July 31-Aug.1 at a site near Stoner on Highway 145 between Dolores and Rico.

A date for a hearing on the injunction had not been set, but if granted, the measure would provide law enforcement with the legal muscle to shut down the smoke-off, which has nearby landowners up in arms and county officials concerned about the safety and welfare of both neighbors and participants.

Highly publicized on Facebook and various websites, the Bong-a-thon is expected to attract more than 1,000 revelers to engage in individual and team smoking contests, trip out on music and camp under the stars. It was held in Park County for five years, but organizers decided to pull out this year after they felt the county had become unfriendly to their event.

On June 29, the Montezuma County commissioners rejected an application for a high-impact permit for the fest, saying it had been received too late to go through the normal permitting process.

However, organizers had initially vowed to hold the event anyway, with one – Chris Jetter – maintaining the permit was only needed for amplified music and another – Frank McDonald – saying the get-together was actually his wedding celebration and therefore couldn’t be stopped. (McDonald, who bills himself as mayor of Stoner, has for years been trying to establish a marijuana lounge/resort in the same area, but his involvement with the Bong-a-thon is unclear.)

The injunction is sought against Jetter, McDonald and Ted Clark, the actual owner of the property just off Highway 145 at County Road 38.5, although the county’s complaint states, “It is unknown whether he is an active participant in the organization of the event or whether he has any knowledge of the event.”

The complaint says the injunction is necessary because penalties for violating the county’s land-use code “are inadequate to prevent the harm of having this large event without first obtaining a permit.”

The complaint says, “The proposed event is unpermitted, and exceeds lawful uses of the property under the Montezuma County Land Use Code. The proposed event constitutes a commercial activity and a special event as defined. The permitting process considers health, safety, and welfare concerns. Without the permit, the County is unable to substantiate whether the event meets requirements for traffic safety, food and health, portable toilets, law enforcement, trash removal, fire mitigation, and other impacts addressed in the Montezuma Land Use Code.”

In an accompanying affidavit, Planning Director LeeAnn Milligan explained why the permit was rejected. She said the first time the Planning Department had been contacted regarding the Bong-a-thon was on May 29, when Jetter asked about a high-impact permit. Milligan emailed him a permit application and other information, she said in the affidavit, and informed him “of the late timing of the application process.” She advised him to contact the Colorado Department of Transportation about access off the state highway.

Jetter emailed her an event summary on June 1, Milligan said, and then contacted her on June 12 to discuss the event.

“I told Mr. Jetter that we had not received any application information from him which made it impossible to proceed,” she stated in the affidavit. “Mr. Jetter became very angry and aggressive and demanded something be done.”

Jetter sent her an incomplete application on June 14, she said, and subsequent submittals would not have met deadlines needed for the permit to be considered by the Planning Commission and for notice for public hearings.

Milligan in her affidavit also provided a list of threshold standards that would have been exceeded by the event, including traffic, parking, solid waste, fire protection, noise, odors, and more – all of which meant the event needed a permit.

Milligan said she spoke with McDonald on July 2 and he stated they would have their event despite the commissioners’ rejection of the permit.

“There has been no further contact with Mr. Jetter or Mr. McDonald since that time,” Milligan stated in the affidavit.

As late as the afternoon of July 10, the Bong-a-thon’s Facebook page was assuring enthusiasts the event would still take place, but seemed to equivocate about its location, in one post saying the site would be announced later but was two-and-a-half hours south of Denver. A poll on the page had earlier asked participants to vote between Stoner and an unspecified site in Pueblo.

Numerous posts lambasted the Montezuma County commissioners for denying the permit application.

“We Don’t Need No Stinkin Permits ! ! !” said one. “BIG Thank You to Frank McDonald and the rest of the crew putting this thing together. It’s more like a full time job year to year. Now if the Haters would just get the hell out of the way and let us Free Americans enjoy ourselves in peace, the world would be a much nicer place for all of us. My vote is for Franks place in Stoner, Co. ! !”

Published in July 2015

‘Darkness’ helps fill void left by Hillerman (Prose and Cons)

Tony Hillerman, the late, great author of 18 novels featuring Navajo tribal police officers Joe Leaphorn and Jim Chee, cited the aboriginal mysteries of Australian crime writer Arthur W. Upfield as the inspirations for his signature blend of page-turning whodunits and gee-whiz forays into cultural anthropology. These are books in which the detectives’ unique understanding of native beliefs and traditions enable them to solve crimes that confound the uninitiated, all while exposing readers to the language and customs, spirituality and ceremonies of the indigenous peoples among whom they operate.

THE DARKNESS ROLLING BY WIN BLEVINS AND MEREDITH BLEVINSThe ever-expanding universe of Hillerman emulators (no reservation, it seems, will remain unscathed) attests both to the formula’s popularity and to the reading public’s insatiable appetite for Native American culture. Some of these authors – Margaret Coel, Dana Stabenow, and now Tony’s daughter Anne Hillerman – have become familiar, bankable brands. Others, while perhaps not as famous, are no less venerated in writerly circles. To this latter cohort I would assign Win Blevins, the co-author (along with his wife, mystery novelist Meredith Blevins) of “The Darkness Rolling.”

It’s not as though Mr. Blevins is new to the game. The author of 31 books, he is a two-time Spur Award winner, a recipient of the Western Writers of America’s Owen Wister Award for lifetime achievement, and a member of the Western Writers Hall of Fame. But only with their latest novel, and their second collaboration, do Mr. and Mrs. Blevins, who are Bluff, Utah, residents, dust off the Hillerman family recipe for what promises to be a tasty series of historical mysteries set in Navajoland.

The year is 1946, and Seaman Yazzie Goldman – half Jewish, half Navajo, all beefcake – has mustered out of the Navy and returned to his family’s Oljato trading post just as film director John Ford and a gaggle of Hollywood stars have descended on Monument Valley. While the war years may have expanded Yazzie’s horizons, they’ve been less kind to his family, as Mose Goldman, Yazzie’s grandfather, has suffered a debilitating stroke requiring Yazzie’s mother Nizhoni and his visiting “aunt” Iris to care for the old man at the expense of maintaining the trading post.

To Nizhoni, her son’s return portends not only a welcome family reunion, but also the chance to whip the trading post back into shape. Yazzie has other ideas, since Ford has hired him to serve as personal bodyguard to film star Linda Darnell, a tempestuous beauty who’s the subject of anonymous death threats. Nature and fiction taking their inevitable courses, Yazzie and Linda soon fall into bed, forcing Yazzie to juggle the toils and temptations of his old and new lives on the Rez.

Complicating matters is the fact that Yazzie’s father Adikai, a saddle tramp who abandoned Nizhoni before Yazzie was born, has just been released from prison after serving 25 years for murder. Vowing revenge against Mose and Nizhoni, whose testimony sealed his conviction, Adikai now styles himself Zopilote, the buzzard, and is coming home to Oljato in hopes of a very different sort of reunion.

It’s a great set-up that, except for the thin anonymous-letter subplot and the distracting antics of some cartoonish FBI agents, unspools rather nicely as Yazzie pings between Linda’s boudoir, the trading post, the movie set, and the sere beauty of a Monument Valley whose vast and silent presence hangs like a guiding spirit over the proceedings.

Rich in character and steeped in Diné culture, “The Darkness Rolling” (Forge/ Tom Doherty Associates) is a perfect summer read for those still mourning Tony Hillerman’s 2008 passing. What’s best, the novel’s denouement leaves little doubt but that we’ve not seen the last of the strapping, stoical, and eminently likeable Yazzie Goldman.

Chuck Greaves of Cortez, Colo., shares book-review duties (“Prose & Cons”) at the Free Press. He is the award-winning author of five novels. Learn more at www.chuckgreaves.com.

Published in July 2015, Prose and Cons Tagged , , ,

Bong-a-Thon’s future cloudy in Montezuma County

By David Long

After hearing that organizers of Montezuma County’s first marijuana festival seem to be moving forward without a permit, the county commissioners have directed their attorney to seek an injunction to stop them.

On Monday, July 6, after hearing from a host of citizens concerned about the smoke-fest proposed near Stoner northeast of Dolores, the board voted unanimously to have attorney John Baxter petition District Court for the injunction.

The board was also exploring other ways to stop the “32nd annual Bong-a-Thon,” as its promoters call it, in its tracks – such as closing the county road leading to the property to everyone except residents.

The commissioners had already rejected a high-impact permit the previous week for the competitive pot-smoking event, but organizers continued to sell “invitations” on the Bong-a-Thon website and were reportedly creating roads on private property near the West Fork of the Dolores near Highway 145.

The event, expected to draw more than 1,000 revelers, is slated for the weekend of July 31-Aug. 1 on a 50-acre parcel owned by Ted Clark and located off Road 38.5. It will feature contests during which pot-smokers vie to be first to consume different amounts of ganja, individually and in teams. It also offers camping and will include vendors.

A week ago, organizer Chris Jetter told the Free Press he might press on with his plans despite the county’s turn-down of his application for a special-use permit, maintaining a permit was only needed for amplified music, a stance that is contrary to the land-use code. [See Free Press, July 2015.] He also said he might try to move the event elsewhere.

Heavy equipment was reportedly seen over the weekend cutting roads into the property where the cannabis convergence is to take place and county road superintendent Rob Engelhart contacted the contractor Monday to tell him he would need a driveway permit to connect to CR 38.5, a graveled road so narrow two cars can’t pass on some stretches.

After hearing from about two dozen concerned nearby landowners, Commissioner Larry Don Suckla repeatedly suggested an injunction as one way to possibly stop the event, even though attorney Baxter expressed doubts it would give the county the necessary authority to shut it down.

“I don’t think an injunction would do much good – it doesn’t give the county any more leverage,” Baxter said. He maintained that the matter would still be a civil rather than criminal issue, with violators subject to fines or short jail sentences, but these penalties could not be imposed until after the fact.

But one man opposed to the Bong-a-Thon reminded the commission of a similar situation in the recent past.

“Didn’t the county do the same thing (get an injunction) to stop a motorcycle rally eight years ago?” he asked. “I feel like you guys are holding back.”

In 2006, county attorney Bob Slough was successful in obtaining a District Court injunction that scotched a massive biker rally planned for Echo Basin Ranch near Mancos, after an application for that event was not submitted in time. Following a day-long hearing, District Judge Sharon Hansen ruled that public safety was threatened because there had not been time to provide enough law enforcement and ensure adequate emergency medical services should they become necessary.

Similar concerns have been expressed about the Bong-a-Thon, as county planners said the application was received too late for it to go through the normal reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission and possibly the county commissioners.

Still Commissioner Keenan Ertel told the crowd Monday that the county needed to protect everyone’s private-property rights, including those with whom neighbors may have differences.

“We are limited in our authority (regarding) what people can do on their property – we’re not a law-enforcement authority,” Ertel noted. “What they’re planning to do is not illegal – pot’s legal, having a party is legal.”

But, he added, “I think the venue is fraught with danger – they’re having contests to see how much (pot) they can consume.

“”I’m 100 percent behind you.”

Ranette Karo, the planning administrative assistant, told the commissioners the high-impact permit application was so incomplete “it was almost funny – they hardly filled out any of it.”

She said Frank McDonald, who has for years been trying to develop a lounge and resort for pot-smokers at nearby Stoner, told her the Bong-a-Thon was to celebrate his marriage.

“(McDonald) said he’s having his wedding and we can’t stop him,” Karo said.

McDonald’s role in the event is unclear, since it is not being held on his property, but the Bong-a-Thon website said McDonald had extended an invitation to hold it at Stoner.

Published in July 2015

Scalia’s dissent is far out, man!

When’s the last time you remember someone using the word “hippie”?

If you say “quite a while,” that’s only because you haven’t read Justice Antonin Scalia’s hilarious dissent from the Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 decision declaring laws against same-sex marriage unconstitutional.

Using puerile mockery to rail and fume about the majority’s opinion, the moon-faced blowhard wrote that if connubial “intimacy” were (as the five pinko, godless judicial activists had decided) a freedom protected by our founding document, then “one would think (it) is abridged rather than expanded by marriage.”

“Ask the nearest hippie,” he added. (I am NOT making this up.)

For the sake of argument, let’s assume the judge hasn’t yet become a likely candidate for involuntary commitment to the “nearest” padded cell. We must also assume he means “having sex” when he says intimacy – as in, Have you two (or three or four, when it comes to hippies) been INTIMATE yet?

So, Scalia obviously believes beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt that hippies are/were the final word on the chafing power of marriage vows as opposed to the “free love” these flower children were rumored to have indulged in with great frequency in the late 1960s. (Even though, Heaven knows, the infidelities and peccadilloes of properly hitched Christian couples have run rampant throughout our larger society ever since Eve messed around with the snake.)

Still, having been referred to in the last century as a hippie myself (even though I would have preferred “beatnik”), I’m rather flattered to be considered by Mr. Scalia as an expert on such matters, i.e., whether marriage truly limits one’s access to “intimacy” with those alluring creatures wriggling so willingly just beyond the bounds of matrimony.

So, as I see it, what Scalia would have me rule on is this: Did I ever regard myself as permanently chained to the marital bed and breakfast after taking the sacred vows, which might have included such frightening phrases as “for better or worse” and “till death do us part”?

Or did I, as a “hippie,” still feel free to engage in “intimate” relationships with people other than my wife?

Hmm, that’s a hard one, as the old joke goes.

Sorry to disappoint you, Judge, but the Age of Free Love ended sometime in the 1970s, when the “me generation” took over and decided that self-interest overrode communal carnal pleasures. I did not have (meaningful) sex with that woman!

Or could it be that Scalia actually wants my opinion (there are no doubt hippies nearer to him than me, but never mind) on whether same-sex marriage is mandated under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

If so, that’s an easy one.

Coinciding, oddly enough, with the Summer of Love in San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury District, the Warren Court ruled in 1967 that any prohibitions against interracial marriage were unconstitutional, despite such snappy arguments as this apparently religion-based one offered up by a Virginia judge during the last gasp of anti-miscegenation laws:

“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races show that he did not intend for the races to mix.” (Such sound reasoning must still warm Scalia’s cockles!)

Yes, the Supreme Court held that any such laws violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment on both the principle of racial equality and by abridging the fundamental right to marry. A unanimous court said that “Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.”

Just substitute “sexual orientation” for “race” in that ruling and you’ve got not just this aged ex-hippie’s answer, but one endorsed by the great majority of this country’s citizens.

There is no earthly, or even heavenly, reason, why any two adults should not cement themselves legally and morally to one another if they wish – even if it does tend to “abridge intimacy” with others, which seems to greatly worry the good judge.

Somewhere toward the end of his rambling diatribe, Scalia tells all those who are still reading that if he had penned the majority opinion, he would hide his head in a bag. (Again, I am not making this up.)

Which makes me wonder about the demands of Mrs. Scalia during their “intimate” moments after 5-4 decisions that go his way.

David Long writes from Cortez, Colo.

Published in David Long, July 2015

Some questions about our new ‘club’

I am pleased to see some other citizens are also concerned about our county’s new membership in a club called the American Lands Council. I understand that it has a president and communications officer – a man and wife – but I would like to know more. My curiosity has given rise to some questions:

• How many members are there in this club?

• Does it have meetings and a secretary to take the minutes?

• I have not in the past few months received a newsletter explaining what our new mission is. Nor have I heard any voice from those that without my consent joined this club for me. How am I to be updated on the activities of this group?

• Does the club have a membership card? If so, I haven’t received mine.

• Do we pay yearly dues? Do the dues increase?

• How do I, as a member, contact the chairman?

• Where are these meetings held (as I may choose to go)? However, I understand they would be in another state – that seems strange and leaves me wondering, how will membership help our county?

From what little I have gathered through hearsay (which is never accurate), the mission of this group is partly to divide and separate the states. Didn’t we fight a war 144 years ago to unite our beloved United States, making us the strongest and freest nation in the world? If all this foolishness about separating states and giving them the title to our federal public lands and letting them write different rules in each state should actually come to pass, who will provide the money to administer these separate lands? Won’t every state need its own bureaucracy? Why would that be more efficient than having the lands administered by the federal government?

Where and how are we to obtain the money to fight fires and save our beautiful environment of which we are so proud?

There are many additional questions, but I have no answers. I am certain, however, that privatization of public lands, which would be the inevitable result if they were turned over to the states, would very likely cut down on camping and hunting opportunities. Even if the states do not sell these lands, they would surely lease them for clear-cutting or mining as was done in the Cumberlands of the past, and I doubt very much the companies will allow us to trespass on their rights-of-way.

I and, I am sure, many others hope that our commissioners will come to their senses and govern for the longterm benefit of the people of Montezuma County as they were elected to do. We cannot afford to become a separate state divorced from the union. I do not care to be a member of the Mystic Knights of the Sea Club. But if you persist in remaining in this club, I demand more information on this bottle of fish you have dropped me in!

Thought for the day: People say life is a bowl of cherries, but sometimes it’s just a lot of raspberries.

Galen Larson writes from Montezuma County, Colo.

Published in Galen Larson

Plan for rape and Pillage reignites opposition

Up in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado, below Wolf Creek Pass, an epic wetlands-preservation struggle has been going on.

The smoldering mess was reignited in May when the Rio Grande National Forest released its final decision regarding the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project (dubbed by some as the “Pillage at Wolf Creek”). This decision allows the exchange of 205 acres of prime Rio Grande National Forest, including some 1500 feet of highway frontage, for 177 acres of difficult-to-develop and landlocked property owned by the Leavell- McCombs Joint Venture. Talk about a smooth poker play.

You may wonder, what’s going on here? Well, it’s the same old story: Money don’t talk, it screams. At the heart of this battle is a Texan billionaire with a love for the real- estate poker game and a sick obsession with creating a fairytale Village at Wolf Creek. This so-called “village” would include condos, luxurygoods stores, and upscale restaurants – 10,000 people at 10,000 feet, it’s been dubbed. Sadly, his imagination is too filled with fantasies of thousands of rich and eager buyers flocking to the Colorado hinterlands to realize what he’s holding in his hand.

Just uphill we have the family-run Wolf Creek Ski Area, which is nestled in a great sweeping bowl up against USA’s Great Divide.

Here you’ll find some of the deepest powder skiing in Colorado.

The land also happens to collect a vast quantity of source waters for the interstate and international Rio Grande River. The owners of the ski area have been on-again, off-again players doing their best to minimize exposure, while remaining savvy to opportunities.

Opposing Mr. McCombs and his sacred mantra of “Development Trumps All” are Colorado grassroots groups such as the Friends of Wolf Creek, San Juan Citizens Alliance and San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council — all of whom have put up a spirited defense on behalf of the wetlands that have no voice.

This struggle has been going on for over two decades now.

To understand the opposition, you must understand that the targeted “parcel” is in Alberta Park. And Alberta Park happens to be the keystone of this great Wolf Creek Pass watershed. It’s where the land levels out and water seeps down deep on its short journey to the head waters of the Rio Grande. Alberta Park is an intricate wetlands of complex subsurface hydrology with thousand-year-old fens (peat-moss landscape) laced throughout. This community performs a myriad of biological functions while storing and filtering the water upon which the Rio Grande stakeholders depend.

Yet our developers’ attitude towards this natural resource is one of disinterested contempt as they attempt to explain how drainage ditches and a small-scale water-treatment plant will compensate for the destruction of this natural water-purification complex and the wildlife habitat that comes with it.

In defense of Rio Grande National Forest Supervisor Dan Dallas and his decision, it must be pointed out that his options were severely restricted by statutory requirements and also by being forced to abide by an odd interpretation of the “Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act” of 1980. (Not to say there aren’t serious questions and objections being raised regarding this most recent EIS process.)

Alaska wilderness 1970-80s, Colorado in the 2010s – what’s the connection? What’s the reasoning here? Go fish… try finding a justification for that interpretation.

Why should ANILCA have standing in this particular Colorado situation? I believe a misuse of the law deserves being questioned. After all, the parcel was already landlocked within the long-established RGNF. The law was created to protect private lands within newly created Federal Land entities, thus I believe citizens have a right, if not a duty, to object to that interpretation.

In any event, now that the RGNF has decided to swap “parcels” and legal title goes to LMJV, the poker game moves on to the Mineral County Commissioners, located in Creede (population <500), the county’s only town, and a comfortable 40 miles from this ground zero.

Hopefully it’ll be different this time, because a decade or so ago, sorry to say, they were pushovers for the slick Texan with deep pockets.

Now it starts again and it’s going to take a lot of informed and active citizens to oppose the power of those deep pockets as LMJV continues their single-minded pursuit of their atrocious Village at Wolf Creek pipe dream.

On Saturday June 20, there will be a celebration at Wolf Creek Ski Area called “Honor Wolf Creek” and it will focus on appreciating this wonderland through art, poetry and music. For details check out PlanetExperts.com, hosts of the event.

I believe the event will help people from all over the state get acquainted and exchange ideas and perhaps come up with strategies on how to convince LMJV of the foolishness of their destructive development plan.

The ultimate goal is to return this priceless parcel back into the Rio Grande National Forest from whence it was torn. Can you join us?

Living near Durango, Colo., Peter Miesler maintains a blog dedicated to sharing scientific information and challenging climate-science contrarians at http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com.

Published in Peter Miesler

A little perspective

Ever heard the phrase “can’t see the forest for the trees”? That is pretty easy to do in this day of emotional environmentalism. Here is a little comparison to think about. The federally controlled lands in the U.S. amount to 623 million acres. How big is that? That is more than all of France, Spain, Germany, Poland, Italy, U.K., Austria, Switzerland, and Netherlands combined! Wow — that’s a lot of federal land!

Getting more “local,” the Whole Country of Germany is about 137,000 square miles, which is a little larger than the state of Colorado at 103,884 square miles, but smaller than the state of Montana. Colorado is larger than the U.K, Greece, and 11 more European countries. I find no record of Sweden controlling the lands and forests in Norway or the U.K.

Back in Colorado, I found that there are 24,452,476 acres of forested lands. Note that is just the forested or tree-covered land and does not include all the rocky knobs and open-range lands. Forested lands total 36 percent of the area of the state. In comparison, the country of Germany is 32 percent forested lands.

Let’s look at who owns and controls the forests. Federal ownership: In Colorado, 68 percent; in Germany, 4 percent. Private: Colorado, 30 percent; Germany, 48 percent. County (and equivalent) and cities and towns: Colorado, zero;, Germany, 48 percent . Other (i.e., Indian, state): Colorado 2 percent, Germany zero. In Germany, the federal entity controls the smallest forest base, and the counties and towns are equal to the private holdings. Here in Colorado the feds control the vast majority of the forests.

A little look into history shows that under the feudal lords of early Germany, the forests were controlled as a “king’s forest,” for the feudal lord’s hunting use only. The result was the forest was stagnating, dying, and the wildlife was declining due to lack of food and was eating what was left of the young tree growth. The collapse of the feudal system and later wars caused the need for mining timbers, which “saved” the forest by thinning it out. During the subsequent wars the forests were all but obliterated from bombing, tanks, etc.

Today, under local control and management, their forests have been restored to where the forest industry employs 1.3 million workers and they export forest products to…. the U.S.? Yes, the U.S.imports spruce and pine from Germany. Their forests also provide hunting, fishing, recreation. Remember, this is in a forest comparable in size to Colorado’s forest. Incidentally, the U.S. imports 57 percent of our forest products from such places and Canada, Chile, Germany, Austria, Brazil, New Zealand, Sweden, etc. We apparently prefer to burn ours instead of producing, using and exporting.

Interestingly, here, we started with a viable forest management activity that resulted in jobs, economic growth, forest resource improvements in all areas of endeavor. Slowly the forests have been closed to management and use, similar to the old feudal “king’s forest.” Today, Colorado’s forests have lost a full third of their acreage into non-productive stagnation. We seem to be falling into the old, destructive European feudal system.

We rarely learn from history, but can we? Germany is a country a little larger than the state of Colorado, with forests about the same size. There are certainly differences, but one thing they have done that has worked was to have the land and resources in local control. The state and counties of Colorado are every bit as capable of governing ourselves and our land and resources as any of the countries in Europe. The forest of Colorado can be restored to health, productivity and multiple use for improved jobs, economy and recreation. Local ingenuity and hard work can once again rebuild what our ancestors did right here in the Four Corners of Colorado. Let’s make them proud that we can build upon what they started.

Dexter Gill is a retired forest manager who worked for private industry, three Western state forestry agencies, and the Navajo Nation forestry department. He writes from Lewis, Colo

Published in Dexter Gill

‘American Meteor’ is a fine frontier yarn (Prose and Cons)

We first meet Stephen Moran, the Brooklyn-born narrator of American Meteor, Norman Lock’s keyhole-view history of the American West, as a 16-year-old bugle boy convalescing in a Washington, D.C. hospital. Young Stephen has lost half his sight, and all his blue-eyed innocence, in the Battle of Five Forks, where “fear, misery, noise, cannon and musket smoke make for each combatant a kind of bell jar” within which “Life, its color and complexity, is reduced – like a mess of stew bones boiling in a pot – to an elemental dish whose simple flavors are rue and terror, hatred and self-love.”

lock-american-meteorBurdened as much by the valor medal he’s been undeservedly awarded as by the horrors of a Civil War he has barely survived, Stephen begins a gimlet-eyed odyssey that will take him ever westward; first to Illinois aboard Abraham Lincoln’s funeral train, then as company photographer for Thomas Durant’s Union Pacific Railroad as it blasts its way toward Utah’s Promontory Summit where, to Stephen’s way of thinking, America “forged its iron union and annealed it in blood.” Personal encounters with General (and later President) Ulysses S. Grant, poet Walt Whitman, and photographer William Henry Jackson all serve to propel Stephen, still wounded if no longer young, toward his own Manifest Destiny in the company of George Armstrong Custer at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

While these and other notables fleck the wide terrazzo of Stephen’s post-war awakening, it is his more prosaic dealings – his friendship with a Chinese railroad worker, his rescue by a freed slave, and his love affair with a doomed Ute woman – that inform his increasingly jaundiced worldview and lead him, haltingly but inexorably, to the novel’s epic (and history-bending) climax.

None are so blind, it is said, as those who will not see. Lock, a literary stylist of the first order, deftly deploys optical motifs – oblique references to sight and vista, light and vision – as cairns by which to mark Stephen’s wandering journey. Not until he loses an eye, for example, does Stephen adopt “a cynic’s view of God and His principal creation.” Not until he’s focused his camera’s unblinking lens on the sun-bleached bones of a thousand bison rotting on a Wyoming prairie – casualties of the frontier adage “every dead buffalo is one Indian gone” – does Stephen find consonance with the wretched plight of the Sioux. And not until he’s given the gift – or is it the curse? – of foresight by Crazy Horse is Stephen, and so the reader, able to fit the events of his life into their broader and darker context:

“I remember how he stood and pointed into a distance that had no end or horizon but seemed to go on and on. My eyes – I had two of them in my dream – became tired and burned, and I would have closed them and looked elsewhere, but there was no turning away from it. Just as Jackson had done, Crazy Horse was teaching me how to see the world for what it is – for what it will be one day.”

If all this sounds a bit gloomy, or maybe outré, fear not. “American Meteor” is at its heart a frontier yarn of adventure and discovery, insight and yearning. Readers who savor the well-turned phrase (Lock is a recipient of both the Dactyl Foundation Literary Fiction Award and The Paris Review’s Aga Kahn Prize for Fiction) and those who demand a little swash with their buckle both will find something to like, and maybe even to love, in this jewel box of a novel.

Chuck Greaves is the award-winning author of four novels, most recently The Last Heir (Minotaur). Visit him at www.chuckgreaves.com.

Published in June 2015, Prose and Cons Tagged , ,

Leaders need to have vision

Montezuma County needs our help. We cannot stand by and let persons in Utah scam our commissioners, because when they are scammed, we are also.

They were elected by the people of Montezuma County and should not govern on advice from Utah or any other state. If they cannot see the problems in Montezuma County and do not have the desire or intelligence to fix them, then maybe they shouldn’t have run for office.

When candidates win a public office they are no longer their own person but serve at the will of the people. That was not shown at a meeting last year when the commissioners ignored the voices of the many to appease the will of a few and voted to eliminate a ten-year-old system of TDRs in the Dolores River Valley. The system had been put in place by citizens who worked for the better part of two years, yet it took only 30 seconds for the commissioners to vote it out. It had been supported by a succession of county commissioners over the years and some even signed a letter asking the new board to not destroy their work.

One term-limited commissioner stated that after eight years in office he had never understood the TDR system. He voted to get rid of it. Destroying the past is no way to build a future.

At a county commission meeting several weeks past I asked them what were their plans to alleviate the 37 percent poverty rate in this county. I finally tracked down the menu that Commissioner Larry Don Suckla read off, but it was a sparse entree with no nourishment, just a lot of appetizers. Where’s the beef ? as they say.

Most of the efforts he cited were things that were started by others – such as the Phil’s World bicycle trail expansion and the lawsuit against Kinder Morgan. I got no new ideas from the commissioners, only a statement from one that government doesn’t create jobs – as he sat in his government-created job garnering a generous paycheck from the taxpayers.

One item on the list stated that Social Services and the Workforce Center will work together to provide jobs. I was under the impression that that was the mission of the Montezuma County Economic Development Association. I was once a member but saw more talk than walk, so I saved my dues for better things – which may have been wine, women, and song, but that is no one’s business.

I have lived in this area for 35 years and it lies heavy on my heart to see what has happened to this city and county from that slow-moving disease, PPLS. To the leaders of this county I say, lead or get the hell out of the way. You were elected by Montezuma County – it is your job to represent the citizens of this county, not some scammers from a club in Utah. And, yes, I do have some economic-development ideas that could help this county, but I’ll take that up with the new chairman of the MCEDA.

Galen Larson writes from Montezuma County, Colo.

Published in Galen Larson

The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands: How the behind-the-scenes lobby group American Lands Council gets funding

Kindra McQuillan
May 15, 2015

Since 2012, the American Lands Council has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to advocate and lobby for the transfer of federal lands to states. Such a move could dramatically change how these lands are managed, affecting anybody who makes a living in, lives near, recreates in, or simply loves the notion of public lands in the West. But who finances the demands?

The Utah-based American Lands Council, or ALC, is mostly funded by memberships, the majority of which are county commissions—that is, taxpayer-funded dues. In 2013, the last year for which records are available, the non-profit raised around $200,000 in contributions. About $157,000 of that came from memberships; $134,000 of that came from the coffers of counties. (Much of the rest comes from contributions from individuals and corporations, including Americans for Prosperity, the right-wing think tank supported by the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch.) Membership ranges from a “bronze” level, which costs $1,000 a year, to “platinum,” which costs $25,000 a year.

FEDERAL PUBLIC LAND SURFACE & SUBSURFACE

This map, which shows federally-owned land in the U.S., is cited by the American Lands Council to show the high proportion of federal land in the West. Map courtesy of the Bureau of Land Management.

“ALC comes in and offers counties this incredible-sounding deal: ‘We’ll get you these lands with minerals and timber and resources,’” Jessica Goad, advocacy director for conservation group Center for Western Priorities, said. “A lot of counties are very taken with this notion, but when you pull back the curtain a bit, (the ALC) is selling an idea that is actually a waste of their time and (their) limited funds.”

According to the Center for Western Priorities, after ALC representatives pitch the cause, county commissioners are left to make the decision; no vote is put to county taxpayers.

So where does this money go? Essentially, to a few salaries, and to lobbying for the pro-transfer movement.

Utah State Rep. Ken Ivory and Nevada County Commissioner Demar Dahl founded the ALC in 2012, the same year Ivory launched H.B. 28 — the bill that created Utah’s Transfer of Public Lands Act, which seeks a transfer of 20 million acres of federal public land to the state. The mission of the ALC, according to its website, is to “secure local control of western public lands by transferring federal public lands…by giving leaders the knowledge and courage to battle…”

In 2013, ALC spent most of its income, about 60 percent, on salaries (40 percent of its total income went to Ken Ivory’s salary, and another 10 percent to his wife’s, according to the ALC’s 2013 tax forms). Of the remaining expenses — travel, advertising, conferences, taxes, and so on — the largest expenditure was lobbying, which used about 10 percent of the ALC’s income. In addition to its lobbying at the state level, the ALC has increased its lobbying efforts in Washington, D.C. Since September 2014, the ALC has paid lobbyist Michael Swenson about $35,000 to reach out to federal legislators in the capital.

“We believe this will be a political solution ultimately resolved by Congress,” Swenson told E&E News this spring. Ivory did not respond to HCN’s requests for comment.

Meanwhile, the group has recently stirred some controversy over its lobbying at the state level.

In February, William Richardson, an aide to Montana State Sen. Jennifer Fielder, registered as a lobbyist for the ALC. Other lobbyists, concerned about the conflict of interest of being both a lobbyist and an aide, alerted Sen. Tom Facey, a member of the Senate Ethics Committee, and Richardson was ultimately asked to leave his post as legislative aide.

In April, the nonprofit Colorado Ethics Watch filed a complaint against the ALC with the Colorado Secretary of State, accusing the ALC of lobbying without registering as a lobbyist group. The ALC had sent an email to Coloradans, urging them to contact state legislators and support S.B. 232, which called for the study of a transfer of federal lands in Colorado to the state. (The bill failed 18-17 in the Senate in late April.)

Under Colorado state law, contacting legislators to push for the passage of a particular bill is considered lobbying, and such action must be preceded by registration with the state, which costs a nominal, though waiveable, $50.

Luis Toro, director of Colorado Ethics Watch, says the ALC needs to disclose its activities, “like every other group, so legislators and the public alike can know who’s spending money to influence legislation.”

Toro was not familiar with the ALC before the complaint, and when asked about the ethics of using taxpayer dollars to fund lobbying, he said that it’s not illegal to do so.

While it’s not illegal for taxpayer dollars to fund lobbying, he said, “this case is tricky.”

“It’s missing a layer of justification,” he said. “It’s taking money for a political agenda that has nothing to do with the county’s agenda. Why should a Utah county pay to lobby in Colorado?”

Given this concern, it’s important for ALC to be transparent about its actions, he said. “People who support nonprofits benefit from knowing what their money is used for.”

Below here is a list of counties where taxpayers have helped support the American Lands Council’s agenda — whether they know it or not:

  • Arizona: Apache, Mohave, Navajo, and an organized group of “Eastern Counties”
  • Colorado: Montrose, Montezuma and Mesa
  • Idaho: Idaho
  • Nevada: Churchill, Elko, Esmeralda, Eureka, Lander, Lincoln, Lyon, Nye, Pershing, and White Pine
  • New Mexico: Otero and Sierra
  • Oregon: Klamath and Wallowa
  • Utah: Beaver, Box Elder, Cache, Dagget, Duchesne, Garfield, Iron, Juab, Kane, Millard, Morgan, Piute, Rich, San Juan, Sanpete, Sevier, Tooele, Uintah, Utah, Washington, and Weber
  • Washington: Ferry, Okanogan, Pend Oreille, Skagit, and Stevens
  • Wyoming: Big Horn, Lincoln, Natrona, and Weston

Kindra McQuillan is an editorial intern for High Country News.

Copyright © High Country News

Published in June 2015 Tagged

Permaculture in practice: A Cortez-area ranch is hosting a workshop on sustainable agriculture

PERMACULTURE EDUCATION

Grant Curry indicates the height of the saplings he planted last year along the top of the swale. Most are now close to 6 feet tall. Photo by Sonja Horoshko

A visit to Hannaniah’s Rest Ranch west of Cortez takes visitors on a gravel road to the head of Trail Canyon at the last electrical pole in the line.

Remote, rural, and waterless, the ranch is the site of a huge working permaculture swale, an earthen berm. Ranch owners Grant and Kathy Curry carved the meandering 3,800-foot structure across the sage-covered desert with a bulldozer and lots of sweat last year.

It resonates with the familiarity of a giant childhood sandbox where summer hours are spent in the company of peers drawing “S” shapes with a stick and using plastic shovels to hump up dry sand to hold water poured from a red bucket.

This place conjures that memory and brings it to life in the adult-scale agricultural project the Currys built into their sloping 80 acres. With no water on the land, they have engraved a restoration project supporting their belief that a cluster of perennial and edible crops will someday provide good nutrition for their family and friends.

A swale is basically a hump of earth. Water is absorbed near the base when it collects, for example after a rainfall, delaying runoff just enough to soak the land before it travels on. The delay causes a plume of swelling earth underneath that increases the nutrition and arability of the soil by amplifying access to scant rainfall.

The banks of the 15-to-20-foot-high berm shape and hold the water course in place. Plants growing on the bank seek the moisture, stretching their roots down and increasing in size and strength. The Currys’ swale has become the site of a future forest. They planted 600 trees after the swale was completed last year.

“The saplings were only 2-3 feet tall when we planted them,” Grant Curry said. “We slipped tubes over the trunks to protect them from deer, but also because trees shut down in the wind. They will not grow when the wind is blowing.”

Many of the trees are now 6 feet tall.

According to Curry, the swale project took only three days to complete because they studied the application of permaculture theories to their site carefully. Now, it is possible for them to share their budding success through workshops and events they present at their ranch and through their Permaculture Provision Project organization.

This month they are offering a two-day weekend convergence of sustainable-agriculture information, diverse techniques and inspiration, on May 23 and 24 at their ranch. The speakers include local, regional and well-known practitioners who will expound on eco-technology, harvesting and holistic practices that function in the local rural landscape.

A “gourmet weed” event is a highlight that will be hosted by Katrina Blair of Durango, author of “The Wild Wisdom of Weeds,” a New York Times-reviewed book that focuses on 13 edible weeds that provide a complete food supply and are a source of medicinal components.

Blair will lead participants on a wildweed walk during the day in addition to offering a slide show featuring the wild 13 perennials. They include purslane, thistle, dandelion, amaranth, dock, lambsquarter, and other familiar names. Her catering business, based at Turtle Lake Refuge, is preparing the Saturday night dinner. “We use the weeds in hundreds of recipes, like pestos, pies, deserts and chais. We’ll be using local foods and some seeds, roots and some of the weeds we find.

“If we can open our eyes to see the wisdom found in these weeds right under our noses, instead of trying to eradicate them as invasive, we will achieve true food security.”

Blair told the Free Press she collects seeds and sends them along with the order when people buy the book from her Turtle Lake Refuge website.

Another presenter will be David Temple, owner of Trees of Trail Canyon, a local source of large specimen species.

“Mature 25-to-30-year-old trees are more effective at carbon capture than saplings because they offer more leaves, more surface and shade canopy,” Temple said. “Maintaining the old ones is very important.”

Temple is a Colorado native and one of the nation’s few board-certified master arborists. Silviculture, the focus of his talk at the convergence, is a forester’s term, he explained.

“It’s the study of ecosystems in groups of trees, like a forest rather than individual trees. I am an arboriculturist. I study the individual tree and its health.”

He said 40 percent of the trees in Cortez are mature elms, which are very important to the health of the community.

“Cortez has a unique location in the high desert and could be an oasis if planning was more proactive, more biodiverse,” he said. “The value of trees in an urban environment is much greater because the work they must do is exponentially larger. In an altered landscape where the pollution is greatest, such as a town or city, the contribution of the individual tree is much greater than in a forest.”

Cindy Dvergsten, a certified educator with Holistic Management International, will offer an overview of holistic management, which goes hand in hand with permaculture. “Permaculture provides an innovative set of practices and tools based on ecological principles and holistic management provides a means of making sound decisions about the human, natural and financial resources we manage. People who learn and practice both are far more successful in managing for long-term sustainability.”

Dvergsten focuses on decision-making that is environmentally, socially and economically sound. Much of her work takes place on the Navajo Nation.

“I have worked with Navajo farmers and ranchers, mostly at the grassroots level, introducing holistic management since 1997.” The most extensive project was called Kéyah’ Be’ Iina’ (Land is Life) based in Hard Rock, Ariz., a community on the Navajo-Hopi partitioned lands.

The project was sponsored by Heifer International in cooperation with Holistic Management International and provided training in the Hard Rock area as well as for the Choctaw people in Oklahoma. Dvergsten helped write the handbook, “Sheep and Wool Production on the Navajo Nation.” Through experience she has learned to appreciate the complexities of Diné agriculture and ranching.

“It is very difficult to understand and work through the myriad of barriers imposed on the Navajo people, especially those who raise sheep, who desire to be good stewards of the land. Holistic management makes sense to agro-pastoral people who manage with the ebb and flow of nature. Traditional Navajo sheepherding practices, for example, kept their flocks moving constantly with the seasons from low to high country; seldom staying in any one place long enough to overgraze.”

At that time the land was healthy, and there was a robust economy based on sale and trade between various tribes and with traders, she added.

“This natural way of managing grazing came to an end with the creation of the reservation and the current grazingpermit system, which destroyed traditional land and grazing stewardship, which forced people to stay too long in one place promoting overgrazing, continuous de-stocking of Navajo lands and over-resting, which is equally damaging.”

Dvergsten owns Arriola Sunshine Farm Navajo Churro Sheep with her husband, Mike Rich. They are well-known for their flock of pure churro sheep.

The Currys have assembled more than 27 experts on sustainable community and agricultural practices, a network of projects, classes and events. Also:

  • Joel Glansburg is slated to speak on “The Permaculture Mind…The Pattern of Regeneration.”
  • Roxanne Swentzell will present “The Food Experience.”
  • Jude Schuenemeyer will update the gathering on the local Apple Restoration Project.
  • Neil Bertrando will tackle “Largescale Land Restoration.”

Many more topics and experts are scheduled. The convergence will also provide a taste of exotic food at the dinner Saturday night. For tickets and information go to www.permacultureprovisionproject. org

Published in May 2015

Down to the wire: San Juan County is still in discussions over public-lands recommendations

SAN JUAN COUNTY PUBLIC LANDS PROPOSALS

Leonard Lee, a member of Diné Bikéyah, talks with Nick Sandberg, San Juan County planner at the first April negotiating meeting held in Blanding, Utah. Photo by Sonja Horoshko

A request for proposals regarding public-lands management from eastern Utah counties, to be included in Utah Rep. Rob Bishop’s Utah Public Lands Initiative, has stalled in San Juan County.

Two meetings held with stakeholders in April yielded little movement from any of the groups involved with proposals on the table for review by the county commissioners.

In her opening remarks at the first meeting, Commissioner Rebecca Benally focused on job creation in the county and her “prayers that people will come together in one mind, one heart and make the decision in the best interest of the people, for the San Juan County residents. … The county proposal will not be a Diné Bikéyah proposal, Lands Council or commissioner proposal. It is the people’s proposal, the citizens’ proposal.”

Two proposal maps were on display at the meetings. An additional, new “energy-zone map,” which designated a large tract of land east of Highway 191 as suitable for mining and energy extraction, joined a proposal submitted by the grassroots San Juan County Lands Council and the Diné Bikéyah’s Bears Ears National Conservation Area/National Monument proposal. (All can be viewed on the San Juan County website.)

The proposal from the San Juan County Lands Council, named Plan B, would designate 590,000 acres of wilderness and 522,000 acres as a national conservation area, within which individual canyons and mesas are identified in acreage increments. The heart of Cedar Mesa – a plateau rich in archaeological sites – is described as 489,762 acres NCA and 230,106 acres of wilderness.

The Utah Diné Bikéyah map, now renamed Bears Ears, lists 1.9 million acres of NCA/national monument and includes 259,000 acres of wilderness inside the NCA designation.

Native tribes and pueblos and conservation groups are advocating stronger protections for cultural, archaeological, ceremonial and sacred sites, with practices such as the gathering of herbs and firewood protected.

The county lands council wants protection for certain areas, but wants to retain the opportunity for plenty of energy development, land exchanges, consolidation and enhanced local management of the Mormon Pioneer Hole in the Rock Trail.

Both groups seek an increased role in management.

It was clear at the April meetings that only these two proposed designation maps propped on easels beside the energy-zone map were being considered for the county plan that is to be submitted to the congressional delegation for inclusion in the Utah Public Lands Initiative package scheduled to be sent to sent to Congress later this year.

At the meetings, stakeholders aired concern over mining and income-producing land designations and the amount of time the proposals have taken, as well as the need to settle matters as quickly as possible.

Heidi Redd, a member of the lands council, explained in the first meeting that the county “definitely can’t run on air.” She continued, “The county cannot operate without mining, tourism and agriculture,” she said. “We must have some [designations] for mining interests and we have to speed up the [bureaucratic] mining process. The NCA will take a couple of years and in the meantime mining can take place in some of the NCA land.”

County planner Nick Sandberg added, “I don’t think the county will support 1.9 million acres of NCA. The commission has got to consider all the residents. Let’s say they are interested in some other kind of designation outside of a core NCA.”

Utah Diné Bikéyah member and former county commissioner Mark Maryboy said it was time to “cut to the chase. … We’ve been working for five years on this plan. Time is of the essence. We’ve done our work, mapped our proposal. We know ours. We know yours. If you want to shrink that, then do that and it will begin a real discussion.”

“Our proposal is just that,” said Diné Bikéyah Chairman Willie Grayeyes. “The language is in our proposal and with that [language] how to work toward protecting the area. As far as the planning, there has to be a concrete plan before we use up all our natural resources, before they are gone for further generations. There are other options for economic development. We must keep the land as close to pristine as it is now.”

From the audience, Terry Knight of the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe asked, “Are we going to make this thing happen? If we don’t, it’ll be too late. I have watched, listened and learned. We have to work with San Juan County to get this thing done. We’ve got smart people here, good energy and if we don’t come up with a plan then somebody’s going to come in and move us out of the way. It’s a ‘we’ thing, not an ‘I’ thing.”

Knight held up a piece of paper featuring a printed management plan, surprising most people from the lands council and the county government who said they had never seen the plan even though it outlined the management of the Bears Ears NCA, defining “Native American Engagement” with recommended legislative language.

It called for explicit recognition of the ancestral and contemporary importance of the Greater Bears Ears NCA, the unique, intact archaeological record found throughout, and the American tribes’ and pueblos’ deep connection and commitment to the lands.

The management plan stated it must integrate available traditional ecological knowledge in close consultation with the tribes and pueblos.

The outline also describes specific ways and means of accomplishing these requests, including an NCA tribal advisory council guaranteeing seats for tribal and pueblo representatives as well as the creation of a cooperating relationship that provides a formal framework for governmental units to engage in active collaboration with federal agencies such as those responsible for the Bears Ears area.

There was little budging from the parties’ positions. Although everyone agreed to meet again 10 days after the first meeting, the same concerns surfaced and nothing changed. “Someone even suggested that no more meetings would be scheduled,” said Josh Ewing, executive director of the Friends of Cedar Mesa, who attended both meetings.

According to a recent update posted at the Diné Bikéyah site, the group was told “by San Juan Commissioners on April 20 that we have their support for advancing the Bears Ears National Conservation Area and Collaborative Management by Tribes in the southwest, but they also indicated they will advance the final proposal without additional input from us, or other Tribes who were not in the room.”

In a phone conversation, Commissioner Benally told the Free Press, “We continue to try and work together. I do not know when the next meeting will be, but the one thing I understand about all the proposals is that we agree on the necessity to preserve the ‘heart of Cedar Mesa.’”

Only eight weeks ago many standalone proposals were listed on the San Juan County website, from a variety of different groups and interests. Now there are only two plus the energy-zone map.

In mid-April a meeting of 50-60 people included 45 inter-tribal representatives from five of 24 tribes and pueblos including the Navajo, Hopi, Hualapai, Ute Mountain Ute, and 20 Pueblo nations of New Mexico. They were joined by five not-for-profit conservation groups at the gathering in Bluff, under the name of the Protect Bears Ears Co alition. The group’s website says they seeking “permanent protection in the form of a National Conservation Area (or National Monument, if necessary) for one of the most spectacular landscapes on earth.”

The weekend event provided an opportunity to discuss the Native American- led effort to protect the greater Cedar Mesa area.

Dan Simplicio, a member of the Zuni Pueblo and a Crow Canyon Archaeological Center cultural specialist, said the welcome was, “extremely gracious, especially, and unexpectedly, from the Utah Navajo people. Mark Maryboy thanked us all for coming and told us they were so glad we have come home. ‘We’ve been taking care of the land while you were away.’

“That has never been said to us before and represented a great beginning to strong relationships in the coalition, a new consensus-building. That was very moving. If this coalition of native tribes and pueblos can do this for Bears Ears then we hope that Window Rock [Navajo central government] can do it too.”

The group made field trips to sites such as Arch Canyon, Butler Wash, Mule Canyon, River House Ruin, and of course, the Bears Ears themselves.

In a video posted on the Friends of Cedar Mesa website, Malcolm Lehi, Ute Mountain Ute, says “hearing the other tribes is very interesting and it brings a better perspective.”

Grand Canyon Trust Native American Program Manager Natasha Hale told the Free Press it was a “strong meeting. It brought together cultural leaders, tribal leaders, people who are part of the cultural resource teams with the tribes. It was evident that everyone is working to protect this land and establish a timeframe and structure. There are many pieces to the puzzle, a lot of moving parts in the proposal.”

She noted that tribes and pueblos have a government-to-government relationship with the United States, which is different than the not-for-profits.

“There are some issues to be worked out between the conservancy groups and the pueblos and tribes,” explained Simplicio. “At the meeting we immediately got into what was important to each of our tribes and pueblos.”

The coalition meeting met with positive responses from attendees. “If the tribes and pueblos are successful in the proposal with the coalition of conservancy groups,” added Hale, “it will set the platform for other protection issues outside of reservation land.”

Official inter-tribal support is growing for the Bears Ears proposal. The Navajo Nation, the All Pueblo Council of Governors and the Hopi Tribe have passed legislation addressing the proposal and written letters giving their position on Bears Ears to the Utah congressional delegation and President Obama. The legislation can be found at the Protect Bears Ears Coalition site online.

In addition to Utah Diné Bikéyah (in partnership with the Navajo Nation), five conservation groups have signed on in support of the coalition: Conservation Lands Foundation, Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, Friends of Cedar Mesa, Grand Canyon Trust, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

Mark Varien, executive vice president of research at Crow Canyon, said, “The sites on the greater Cedar Mesa area are among the most important archaeological resources in the world right now. They contain the best-preserved sites, the most amazing art work in the world, and they are the most unprotected. Preservation of those is our primary interest in being part of Bears Ears Coalition.

“But also the research potential there can yield very important insights not only to pueblo culture, but other tribes, Navajo and Ute and of course the Mormon pioneers. All of that will help us understand what governs how cultures form and change.”

Published in May 2015 Tagged

Methane mystery: Researchers converge on the Four Corners to study a ‘hot spot’ of the gas

Scientists from several agencies, including NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, are taking a closer look at the Four Corners after a European satellite detected the largest concentration of methane in the United States hovering in the region.

Teams of researchers recently traveled to the area to confirm the findings, and to pinpoint the specific sources of the potent greenhouse gas.

The initial field campaign, called TOPDOWN (Twin Otter Projects Defining Oil Well and Natural gas emissions) 2015, was planned by scientists from the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado-Boulder, the University of Michigan and NOAA. Scientists from NASA and other organizations later joined in the study, lending additional equipment, funding and expertise.

From 2003 and 2009, a European Space Agency satellite measured a persistent atmospheric hotspot of methane above the intersection of Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona and Utah. The isolated cloud of methane was much larger than any other source of methane in the United States observed by the satellite, but the satellite images did not reveal the sources of the methane gas. Researchers suspect that some of the methane did not originate in the Four Corners, but was blown in from neighboring regions.

Eric Kort, a leading climate expert and a professor of atmospheric science with the University of Michigan, was the lead author of the study that revealed the methane hot spot. Kort is now part of the TOPDOWN 2015 study and traveled to the area to help gather new data.

“I like having environmental discussions based on actual observations,” said Gabrielle Pétron, a scientist from the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at CU-Boulder, working in NOAA’s Earth System Research Laborator y. As part of the ground cmapaign, Pétron captured original data on methane seeping from the ground in the Four Corners. Eryka Thorley, a graduate student intern for NOAA, joined her.

Methane leaks into the air from both natural sources and human activities. “The largest natural sources of methane in the world are wetlands,” Pétron told the Free Press. However, human activities now make up more than half of all methane emissions.

NOAA wants to better understand human-caused methane emissions, and monitoring has intensified in the United States in the past 10 to 15 years, said Pétron.

In the United States, the main anthropogenic sources of methane include natural-gas and petroleum development; ranch animals, which produce methane as they digest food; landfills; and coalmining, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

In a recent joint press release about the TOPDOWN 2015 study, scientists stated that likely sources for the methane hot spot in the Four Corners are oil and gas activities, including those related to extracting coalbed methane. They also suspect that active coal mines and natural methane seeps, such as the Fruitland coal outcrop at Carbon Junction in Durango, contribute to the elevated methane levels.

Locally, there are more than 20,000 active oil and gas wells, and there are easily as many inactive wells, Pétron said. There are also several active coal mines, coal-burning power plants, natural-gas compressors and processing plants, gas seepages from coal outcrops, landfills, farms and ranches, all potentially contributing methane emissions.

Pétron is quick to point out that the hot spot does not pose an immediate human health risk. Methane is naturally present in the air and is not toxic. Although methane is not entirely harmless, the situations that would endanger human health do not apply to the hot spot.

According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine, methane, the primary component of natural gas, is a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas. When concentrated, it is highly flammable and explosive and can cause suffocation if inhaled, by displacing oxygen in the lungs. Methane gas is one of the reasons miners traditionally brought canaries into coal mines.

However, when methane is released into the atmosphere it traps heat like glass in a greenhouse. Methane accounts for approximately 15 percent of global annual greenhouse-gas emissions, according to figures cited in President Obama’s recent Climate Action Plan. The lighter-than-air gas, along with other greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, ozone and water vapor, captures heat from the sun’s rays before it can radiate into space. The more greenhouse gases that are in the atmosphere, the more earth’s temperature rises.

According to the EPA, methane traps significantly more heat than carbon dioxide. If compared directly over 100 years, methane would trap 25 times more heat than carbon dioxide.

In addition to methane’s role as a heat-trapping gas, scientists have additional concerns. The gas contributes to ground-level ozone, a major cause of smog and an EPA-regulated pollutant that causes coughing, breathing difficulty and lung damage.

Also, air pollutants such as benzene and hydrogen sulfide often seep out along with methane. When the air samples from the TOPDOWN 2015 study are analyzed, scientists will be able to identify if additional compounds such as these are escaping into the air in the Four Corners.

Conversely, when natural gas, which is mostly methane, is burned, it produces fewer nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide than coal or oil for each unit of heat released, according to the EPA. These qualities make it a popular fuel for heating, cooking, generating electricity and for industry.

Thorley admits that the dynamic between people and climate change is complex. “The challenge is finding a specific focus that you can work on.”

“I’m really interested in air quality because [air] is the most essential thing to life,” Thorley said.

The Four Corners Air Quality Group organized a public science forum in Farmington, N.M., on April 17 to coincide with the new research. The group held the event to inform the public on what research has been done and what scientists have learned about the hot spot. Representatives from NASA, NOAA, the University of Michigan, the Western States Air Resources Council and the Western Regional Air Partnership — two regional groups focusing on air-quality issues — shared information about ongoing studies and what they hope to discover by gathering additional scientific measurements.

Attendees were invited to ask questions and to inspect the instruments in the NOAA and Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR)- designed mobile labs. As part of the study, scientists used the vehicles to investigate large methane plumes observed by aircraft, and assist in attributing the methane to a specific source and measuring it near the surface.

Scientist drove the mobile labs on public roads throughout the San Juan Basin in April, conducting surveys. The special equipment measured methane, water, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the air every two seconds. Onboard computer screens displayed the real-time measurements.

When scientists encountered a methane source, they positioned their mobile lab downwind and allowed their instruments to collect data. They also gathered samples of air in glass vials to be analyzed later for chemical compounds and isotopic chemical fingerprints at the NOAA and INSTAAR laboratories in Boulder.

According to Pétron, chemical isotopes vary depending on the source of methane, and are unique. For example, the isotopes found in a methane plume at an animal feed lot will be different from the isotopes from a landfill, or an oil and gas operation.

By isolating isotopes, scientist can more closely trace methane back to a specific point source. The isotopic signature of the Fruitland coal outcrop is a well-documented example that can be used to determine what is in the air, said Pétron.

In order to better understand what is coming from where, several aircraft from NOAA and NASA made a second set of measurements from the air during the month of April. The planes collected information about methane, air quality and climate. The planes were set to cover the 2,500 square miles of the San Juan Basin, and flew in a variety of conditions, collecting data from varied elevations throughout the study.

Kort said they had a number of good flight days, and that allowing for bad weather was one of the reasons they allotted for a full month in the air.

“We can see indications of different chemical fingerprints,” Kort said. “Often sources for methane emissions are co-located, so geographically they are hard to distinguish. It’s tricky to pull it apart.”

Kort went on to explain that many coalbed methane and gas wells are near each other, but are drilled to different depths to extract the different fuels, which yield different fingerprints.

The team wrapped up its research at the end of April, and expects the results of the study to be published, after a peer review, in a little over a year. “We have such a rich data set, there might be studies coming out for sometime afterward,” Kort said.

Kort said all of the data collected will go to the public. “If someone wants to use data I collected, that’s great.”

“The air is a shared resource — with everyone in the world.” Pétron said. “When we talk about methane, it is a long-term problem.”

The team of scientists hopes that tracking and measuring methane emissions more accurately in the United States will give stakeholders and decision- makers the information they need to plan for the future.

Published in May 2015 Tagged

Winds of change: The Navajo Nation’s new president pledges to listen to chapters

NAVAJO NATION PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Incoming Navajo Nation Vice President-Elect Jonathan Nez and President-Elect Russell Begaye speak on KHAC 880 AM in Tse Bonito, N.M., after winning the the opportunity to lead the Diné. They hope to implement change in the Navajo Nation and bring healing to the people after a divisive election process. Courtesy photo

The new president of the Navajo Nation is promising to change the way people are hired for administrative and official positions and to give local citizens more input into development in their areas.

Russell Begaye, a former council delegate from Shiprock chapter, and his running mate, Jonathon Nez, a council delegate from Shonto Chapter, were the victors in the controversial and long-delayed election that garnered press and interest worldwide. They were chosen over former two-term president Joe Shirley, Jr., and his running mate, Dineh Benally, in a special election April 2.1

Results of the election began flowing from the chapters to the election office soon after the polls closed on April 21 at 7 p.m. Early in the evening it was clear that the victory would go to Begaye / Nez. The official tally was 62.5 percent (25,745) for Begaye vs. 37.5 percent (15,439) for Shirley. In total, 37.5 percent of registered voters participated.

By the end of the week Shirley had posted a concession on his website, “Dineh & I believe in the voice of the Navajo people – they have spoken. We support their call for change and offer our prayers for the new leadership that was elected. Let’s continue to move forward together.”

“We now have global interest in the Diné,” said Begaye in a phone conversation with the Free Press. “The election news spread all over the world, people followed the outcome, and that is to our people’s advantage. People are listening and watching what we will do.”

The team capitalized on that by heralding changes in how things will be done one week after the election, on Navajo Sovereignty Day. In a statement, they addressed their administrative vision for a responsible government and new opportunity, spelling out the significance of the celebration while challenging the people to be involved in exercising their sovereign rights.

“I call upon all Navajo citizens to get involved in their communities,” wrote Nez, “to play an active role in advancing changes to improve the nation. There are a myriad of possibilities before us.”

Begaye emphasized self-governance and cooperation with outside entities looking to develop projects on the nation.

“Our government is continuing to emerge and take greater responsibility in ensuring the rights of the Navajo people. We declare that we have always been a sovereign nation and will act accordingly for the benefit of our people and the honor of our ancestors.”

Help wanted

During the transition period before the inauguration, Begaye and Nez are making it clear that they are working together to tap into the talent on the reservation. They are precise about their intent to find citizens able and willing to do the work.

Soon after their victory they circulated a request for applicants to apply for the jobs they will fill in their administration team.

“We’re reaching out to the people to find the best-qualified candidates for the positions. In the past, friends and relatives, supporters were the people appointed to the administration jobs,” Begaye told the Free Press. “But we want the best-qualified people to work for the nation. We’re calling for applications because we know the people are out there and we want the best — whoever and wherever they are.”

The positions include executive-level jobs as division directors, controller, attorney general, EPA administrators, officials in the Washington, D.C., offices, the Hopi Land Commission, and others. Just as Begaye and Nez predicted, the response has been swift and strong, with hundreds of qualified applicants by press time, he explained, and the expectation of many more by the May 4 deadline.

“We’ll sit down together and begin deciding on Tuesday, but this time the decisions will be based on qualification, not who you know or if you worked on our campaign.”

Begaye is confident that there is a wealth of talent, skill and education among the Diné, and that it will be uncovered on a local level, for community development. His administration will be seeking local input, asking what the people want, not telling them what Window Rock’s central government wants for them.

This is especially critical in economic development, he said. Local people know what will work for them and what they want in their communities. “We want their economic dreams to come true. We want to know those dreams, support those dreams – skate park, cafés, softball fields, businesses, walking and running trails. ‘Dream away,’ we say, and tell us what you want.”

His administration is not against development of any kind as long as it involves the impacted people, he said. “We are going to rely on them to decide ways development can increase the health and betterment in their home communities. They are the first level of concern for economic development.”

Begaye said the people must agree before anything can happen. “Local people are involved in planning; they have a voice in what happens.”

Projects that prove problematic are usually the ones that didn’t ask the people first. “Those can create a wrong project in the wrong place.”

The controversial Escalade/Confluence proposal to build a tramway, restaurant, shopping mall and river walk at the Grand Canyon is an example of a bad deal in that way, he said.

“The corporation from the outside divided the people because they did not consult with them from the beginning. Is this what they want? I want them to have the first say, first to get the good paying jobs and benefit their communities, profit from development.”

Another way to extend the benefit to the people is to negotiate on their behalf to utilize the natural resources on their land. Begaye explained that the Navajo Coal Mine, as an example, near Shiprock, is a concern and an opportunity. The low quality of the coal was a known factor when the Navajo Nation acquired the mine last January from BHP Billiton, but the markets can change in just 12 months. “We are calling for a study of the coal quality in area No. 5. That part will be mined in the future and we need to weigh our concerns against the real existing market for the low-quality coal.”

At the same time, he added, it is very important to develop wind and solar and other alternative-energy resources now, today. “Even the natural gas we have can replace coal in power plants.”

Power production also presents opportunity for the people of the nation. “Many Diné live without power, but we can bring the power to our people. They will benefit from the energy we produce and ship to other markets in cities and urban areas. The transmission lines that move the power run through remote locations and we will need to get that power to the people. Transfer stations are key to that issue.”

Teamwork

Begaye does not intend to stand alone in the spotlight as president. His vice president will serve jointly with him. They will be a team. “Sometimes, particularly in the old model, the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing,” Begaye said.

“I want Vice President-Elect Nez sitting beside me making decisions together with a number of the people as a core team. We will serve as a model for teamwork, which is something we need in our nation.”

He described how the Diné have learned to see themselves as alone and limited in the influence they may have on the economy and the direction the nation will take in the future.

“You ask about my dream? We really need to learn to commit ourselves to working together. When

I go out there, everybody seems to be working solo. Even chapters are not working together.

“I’d like to see us do away with duplication and the invisible barriers, the idea that non-collaboration is okay. It isn’t. I want us to be intentional, go out of our way to work with each other, people to people, chapter to chapter and department to department. If we can learn that way of operating and managing, then our current resources, human and natural, will really stretch our dollars, our energy and capacity and put it to work serving the Diné.”

The inauguration is scheduled for May 12 in Window Rock, Arizona.

The election had been clouded in controversy throughout the process.

On Monday, April 20, the day before the special presidential election, the Navajo Nation’s supreme court held a final hearing to examine a Window Rock District Court decision three days earlier to “stay” the April 21 vote, yet again. The court cleared the path for the election to finally commence when it issued a permanent writ of superintending control against the Window Rock District Court. The written statement explained that the “district court egregiously abused its discretion in essentially reviewing the decisions of this court [that the election be held on April 21 and funded by the Navajo government] and substituting its judgments for that of the court.”

The next morning the polls opened at 6 a.m. across all 110 chapters of the Navajo Nation, five and a half months after the opportunity to vote for president and vice president on the November general election ballot was postponed due to the disqualification of Christopher Clark Deschene, second-place winner in the August 2014 primary election.

Deschene appeared to have won the right to run against Shirley. But his fluency in Navajo, a requirement for the presidency, was challenged.

Ultimately, Deschene was disqualified.

The Election Code states that upon disqualification of a candidate after the primary, the next-highest candidate will be placed on the general-election ballot. Russell Begaye was next in line.

But a tumultuous five-month battle over voter rights and candidate qualifications followed Deschene’s rejection. Window Rock was barraged with court hearings, appeals and petitions and the debate over the native-language fluency requirement.

Finally, on Feb. 20, the Supreme Court ordered the election administration to hold the general election between Shirley and Begaye “as soon as possible and without further delay.” Three days later Edison Wauneka, director of the election administration, announced that the election would be April 21.

The following eight-week campaign was peppered with continuing legal skirmishes over language fluency and its relationship to culture and governance.

Young Diné tribal members grappled with the relevance of the Navajo language today and suggested that a fluency requirement diminishes fair representation. The growing protests resulted in a call for a vote of the people on the issue. That, too, became a political football as all three branches of government argued over when the referendum should take place and how it would be funded. In the end it was determined that the $317,000 cost of the referendum will be paid with money from the Undesignated Unreserved Fund.

In his final State of the Navajo Nation address, April 20, incumbent President Ben Shelly said the referendum will allow the people to decide if a president needs to be fluent in Navajo. The referendum is scheduled for June 9.

Published in May 2015 Tagged

Phil Lyman speaks out about his conviction: Provocateurs usurped event

SAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER PHIL LYMAN

San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman addresses media at the May 10, 2014, ATV ride near Blanding, Utah. Photo by Shannon Livick

Convicted by a jury of two misdemeanors related to a protest ATV ride last year, San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman says the ride got so out of hand that he does not believe it accomplished what he had originally intended.

“It changed so much,” he said by phone from Blanding the weekend after a jury in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City found him and another county resident, Monte Wells, guilty of conspiracy and of riding a motorized vehicle in a closed area on public lands. “The initial idea was to tell the BLM, ‘We want action, we’re tired of waiting. We’re going to ride that trail’.”

The protest was related to the BLM’s 2007 closure (to motorized uses) of part of a seven-mile trail through nearby Recapture Canyon, which was done on a temporary basis but had continued for seven years. Lyman had organized an ATV ride into the canyon, promoting it on social media after a town-hall meeting at which attendees agreed it was a good idea. He wrote about it in a column in the Deseret News and later expressed disappointment that the paper had taken out his open invitation to people to join in the event.

The trail is open to motorized travel at its northern end, which is adjacent to Recapture Dam just outside Blanding. Several miles further on, it is closed by the BLM, but there is a portion for which the San Juan Water Conservancy District has a right-of-way to maintain an irrigation pipeline. Beyond that, the route turns into a narrow footpath.

On the morning of May 10, 2014, with hundreds of people in Blanding ready to ride motorized vehicles into the canyon, Lyman said he’d already decided to tell them not to go on the narrow, overgrown portion of the trail. “We basically called off the ride,” he said. “That’s why we stayed on the county road.”

He said – and defense attorneys argued in court – that the riders had been given permission by a representative of the water district to ride on its right-of-way. However, the prosecution said that easement was solely for the purposes of maintaining the pipeline, and the jury apparently agreed.

Lyman said he believed they did have the right to travel that part of the trail. “The water conservancy easement is a valid easement,” he said.

He and many other riders turned around at the end of the “pipeline road,” but others ventured further, running ATVs over vegetation. Lyman told the Free Press there were provocateurs in the crowd urging people on, taunting them, even carrying intentionally misspelled signs in support of the ride. “There were a lot of undercover organizations there,” he said. “That was so unfair. That wasn’t Blanding’s protest. We’re very law-abiding, normal, and peaceful and most of all we value the resources.”

He said he tried to talk to some sign-carrying people in the crowd that he didn’t recognize, but they were “evasive.” A right-wing radio talk-show host with the Guerilla Media Network, Pete Santilli, was in the crowd stirring people up, Lyman said.

“It did not accomplish what I intended,” he said. “For the most part it was called off, the trail part of it. . . .I think the protest and rally got a lot of attention. It certainly got swept away in places. I could see that it was going to happen but I apparently couldn’t contain it.”

Although the ATV ride happened a month after a tense standoff in Nevada between the BLM and rancher Cliven Bundy over his failure to pay grazing fees, the Recapture protest “was not planned on the heels” of that incident but well before it. However, the Bundy incident sparked widespread interest in the Utah ride and a number of outsiders showed up, including one of Bundy’s sons as well as national media.

Lyman said despite his changing the plan and telling people not to ride the closed part of the trail, “by that morning it was just really evident that there’s some people that really wanted to commandeer this event and turn it into something it really wasn’t.”

The Recapture closure itself was not supposed to be the focus of the protest, he said. “Recapture was just the venue, just a platform.” The real issue was “the way BLM deals with issues in San Juan County.”

Lyman reiterated that people are frustrated with the seven-year-old “temporary” closure. If the agency would just make a decision — even if it decided to permanently close the route to motorized use — it would at least allow the county an opportunity to challenge the decision, he said.

Since the protest, the BLM has taken action on some other trail issues including one in Indian Creek, Lyman said, and he believes the ATV ride prompted that flurry of action.

Lyman said he is relieved that two other men charged with him and Wells were acquitted by the jury but is disappointed by Wells’ conviction for conspiracy. They are to be sentenced July 15 and could face up to one year in jail and $100,000 in fines on each count.

“Things are going to end badly for me, obviously,” Lyman said.

Interviewed on a Sunday night, he was preparing to attend a meeting of the San Juan County commission the following day, but said he is concerned his conviction will affect his ability to do his job.

“Ethically I have a dilemma,” he said. “I guess my dilemma is, to be a commissioner right now the prudent thing is to do less and stay out of issues to do with jurisdictional conflicts. Yet I feel like that is the job of a commissioner.

“If I put something on my commissioner [Facebook] page and someone shares it or likes it, they’re charged with conspiracy. I can’t really function in that environment.”

Published in May 2015 Tagged ,

Two Utah men found guilty in protest ride

MAY 2014 RECAPTURE CANYON ATV PROTEST

Motorists in an ATV protest ride in May 2014. Photo by Shannon Livick

SALT LAKE CITY – San Juan County, Utah, Commissioner Phil Lyman and a local blogger, Monte Wells, were found guilty May 1 of two federal charges in connection with an ATV protest ride a year ago near Blanding.

Two other men who had been charged, Trent Holliday and Shane Marian, were found not guilty.

The ride drew hundreds of people to a warm, dusty trail a few miles from Blanding on the morning of May 10, 2014. The route cuts through a portion of Recapture Canyon that has been closed by the Bureau of Land Management since 2007 under a temporary order designed to protect archaeological resources.

The verdict was hailed by some, criticized by others.

“I was pleased to see the guilty verdict for Commissioner Lyman and Monte Wells,” said Rose Chilcoat, associate director with Great Old Broads for Wilderness, an environmental group that has been involved in issues in San Juan County.

“Those were intentional and willful acts that just can’t be tolerated in a civil society where you have to have some constraints and it can’t be a free-for-all of everybody doing what they want. It is refreshing to see the federal government pursue cases where people have been flouting federal law, especially as it relates to public lands.”

Bob Turri of SPEAR (San Juan Public Entry and Access Rights), a grassroots group advocating for motorized use, had another take.

“I don’t feel good about the verdict,” he told the Free Press. “I feel those guys are being railroaded. They did some things that were probably wrong, but I don’t think the federal government is really upfront. Out of all the people who violated the rules that day, why were these four selected?”

Turri said he did not join in the protest ride, but watched it. “I told Phil Lyman I didn’t think it was probably a good thing to do, there was a better way to do this, there was all the ammunition in the world for a lawsuit against the federal government. He did what he believed was right, but that’s why I didn’t ride it, but the violation itself was not that serious.”

The 12-member jury deliberated seven hours, following two and a half days of testimony and arguments by attorneys for the U.S. government and the four defendants, who were tried simultaneously.

“On May 10, 2014, each of these four defendants crossed the line,” said assistant U.S. attorney Lake Dishman in opening arguments. “They willingly and willfully drove an ATV through an area they knew was closed to off-road vehicles.”

All four, he said, were members of a conspiracy. “They conspired or agreed with each other to break the law.” It was not a conspiracy “shrouded in secrecy,” he said, but an open one where they invited others to join them.

But Jered Stubbs, Lyman’s attorney, countered that locals were frustrated because “year after year the BLM did not lift the temporary closure,” so finally Lyman “decided to lead a lawful political protest.”

“Phil and others believed they had a right to be in that canyon,” Stubbs said.

Jason Moore, the state chief ranger for the BLM in Utah, testified that there is a multitude of archaeological sites in the canyon, including cliff dwellings, potsherds, fire hearths, midden piles, burial cysts, storage cysts, and rock walls.

He said on May 9, the day before the ride, he and other BLM officers set up four motion-activated trail cameras in the canyon and checked to make sure the closure signs were standing. On May 10 he hiked into the canyon about 6 a.m. but left about 11 a.m. at the request of San Juan County Sheriff Rick Eldredge.

The BLM and sheriff ’s office had agreed the sheriff would provide protection for BLM rangers so long as they agreed to follow his instructions. “At 11 o’clock he asked us to leave the canyon so we did,” Moore said.

The ride followed a rally in Blanding earlier in the day drew a large crowd of media, local citizens, and people from outside the area, including supporters of Cliven Bundy, the Nevada rancher who had clashed with BLM officials a month earlier for refusing to pony up grazing fees. Lyman has told the Free Press there were undercover instigators rabble-rousing at the ride. (See sidebar, Page 5.)

Chilcoat told the Free Press that Great Old Broads pulled back from initial plans to walk the trail during the protest. “Our organization and members had received death threats,” she said. “We ended up modifying our plans and just deciding to witness. Then, because of militia in town brandishing weapons, death threats, etc., we eventually were compelled by friends and others not even to go in San Juan County that day.”

The quiet, briskly air-conditioned courtroom in Salt Lake was a sharp contrast to the sunny trail rumbling with ATVs a year earlier.

Josh Ewing, director of Friends of Cedar Mesa, a nonprofit in San Juan County, testified the protest ride was the talk of the county for weeks.

“If you lived in San Juan County and hadn’t heard about this ride there was something wrong with you,” he said, to laughter.

Ewing said he served with Lyman on a citizens’ group that advises the county commissioners on public-lands issues. “Commissioner Lyman is one of the hardest-working, most responsible and knowledgeable public officials I’ve ever encountered,” Ewing said. “We don’t agree on public-lands issues entirely” but Lyman is willing to listen, he said.

“I certainly wouldn’t be here today if I wasn’t compelled to be.”

Friends of Cedar Mesa was not directly involved in the Recapture controversy, he said, and Ewing hadn’t planned to attend the ride.

“But I found out the other conservation groups weren’t going to be there, primarily out of concerns for safety of their volunteers,” he said. “I decided I couldn’t leave it to BLM or others” to document the event, so he decided to film it himself, hiking into the canyon to a point on the closed section “where I felt if people drove past there, they would do damage” to the natural or cultural resources.

Clips from Ewing’s footage were shown in court and included shots of ATVs, one driven by Wells, trundling down the road past Ewing. Lyman was in some footage as well.

Juan Palma, state director for the BLM in Utah from 2010 through 2014, when he retired, testified that no rightof- way had been granted to the county as of May 10, 2014. He also testified that he, Lyman and Wells had had lunch once prior to the planned ride and spoke about it, and that he and Lyman discussed the ride in emails and phone conversations. In one email, Lyman wrote Palma that “my hope indeed my prayer is that the BLM will. . .make this a legal rather than illegal movement.”

In another email, Lyman wrote that “San Juan County plans to withdraw our silly Title V right-of-way application,” but Palma said the other two county commissioners did not agree with that and the application was not withdrawn. San Juan County did not give approval for the protest ride and did not officially participate.

Meanwhile, BLM officials were urging Lyman not to hold the ride. Lance Porter, then BLM district manager for Utah’s Canyon Country District, wrote Lyman, “I strongly urge you to cancel the proposed ride” and added that “BLM will seek all appropriate civil and criminal penalties.”

Palma said the environmental assessment regarding the county’s right-of-way application was initially delayed because of litigation concerning two local men who illegally improved a road through the remainder of the canyon. Then reviews of impacts to wildlife, water, soil, and archaeology had to be conducted. Palma also said the county “kept changing the application,” causing delays.

“Throughout this whole thing Mr. Lyman and I had conversations about how close we were to completing our environmental work to complete this right-of- way,” Palma said, adding, “We were so close to the end.”

The defense brought up a May 1, 2014, phone conversation between Lyman and Palma, apparently recorded by Lyman, in which Palma, referring to the ride, said, “Nobody is going to get arrested and nobody is going to do all that kind of stuff.” Defense attorneys said that could be construed as giving permission for the ride.

Palma testified that the context of his remark was “given what occurred in other parts of the West, we [the BLM] were not going to have all kinds of law enforcement there to arrest people.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jared Bennett asked him, “Did BLM arrest somebody on May 10 in Recapture Canyon?”

“No,” Palma said, he’d just told his officers to observe and to photograph any damage done to archaeological sites.

Later, Porter testified that he had hand-delivered a letter to Lyman on April 28, 2014, asking him to cancel the ride.

BLM special agent Brian Loftin testified that he’d done an Internet investigation and found numerous instances in which Lyman discussed the planned ride on his Facebook page, even complaining that when the Deseret News published an opinion piece by him, the paper removed his invitation to people to join the ride.

Wells had also publicized the ride on his website, Petroglyph.com.

Holliday and Lyman had liked and shared some posts between them on Facebook. Marian’s name was not found in the Internet investigation, Loftin said.

The defense hung its hopes on the stalwart shoulders of Ferd Johnson, a seemingly ageless Blanding man who after working for the Utah Department of Transportation for 31 years then served 11 years on the board of the San Juan Water Conservancy District, then became its water master, a position he still holds.

He testified that he regularly rides the Recapture road from the district’s pumphouse at the north end to a turnaround point beyond which the route becomes a foot path. The road, he said, sits on top of the pipeline and the district has a right-of-way from the BLM that extends 25 feet from each side of the pipe.

The northernmost part of the route is open to motorized travel. Then there is a BLM closure, but the road is still pass able and the water district has a right-of- way continuing to the turn-around point, where the pipeline goes up a hill.

Johnson said Lyman had approached him prior to the ride and asked if it would be all right if the riders drove on the closed “pipeline trail” to the turnaround, and Johnson said yes.

A gate at the north end is “usually locked to keep cows out,” Johnson said, so on the Monday before the Saturday ride he made sure it was open.

“They had permission,” he stated.

However, a stipulation agreed to by both sides, and read to the jury, stated that the water district “held a limited right-of-way in a portion of Recapture Canyon [that] flowed from a grant from the BLM in 1986 for the purpose of operating and maintaining a pipeline.”

The prosecution pointed out that the protesters were not doing any maintenance.

Referring to a video clip of riders milling about in the closed area, attorney Bennett asked Johnson, “Do you see anybody digging? Do you see them looking at the pipeline?”

“They probably didn’t know they was on top of it,” Johnson replied.

Bennett then referred to Lyman, who was in the video. “Is he digging?” he asked.

“Why would he be digging?” Johnson asked, prompting laughter.

Although Lyman was careful not to drive onto the footpath part of the route, others did.

The jury apparently did not believe Johnson’s permission was sufficient to override the BLM closure, finding Wells and Lyman guilty on both charges. It acquitted the other two men despite the fact that photographs placed them on the closed pipeline road as well.

The charges of conspiracy and driving on public lands closed to motorized vehicles, both misdemeanors, carry penalties of up to one year in jail and $100,000 in fines. Lyman and Wells are to be sentenced July 15.

Published in May 2015

Touch of gray

Fifty.

50.

Five-Zero.

Not dollars in my bank account.

Not miles that I ran.

Not cups of coffee I drink in a day.

Years.

Fifty years.

Fifty years old.

As I write this, I am in the twilight, no, near-midnight, of less-than-middle-aged. I have five days left of the fabulous 40s. And what’s next?

The F—ing 50s?

I am a goddamn half a century old.

How did it happen?

I was never one of those fanciful youths within whom rested a firm conviction of my own invincibility. I was always certain that I would die young – long before now — so it is really a valid question – “How did I get here?”

I guess I got here the way that most others do, and maybe they, too are utterly surprised, but I will say that I’m glad my intuition was off.

As it usually is.

I remember when my Dad turned 40 – that was over the hill, one foot in the grave. We made a huge deal about celebrating. I don’t think we did anything for his 50th – the novelty of aging had worn off by then. 50 wasn’t funny.

And I am not a birthday person. I’ll certainly say “Happy Birthday” to a friend and even grab a treat for them at lunch, but I don’t want anything big around mine – I really don’t appreciate have the spotlight shining on me.

Plus, I figure, we should really be celebrating my mother – she did all the work that day, all of those years ago. I just arrived and received all of the credit.

50 years ago, to be exact.

25 plus 25.

But I will admit, that as much as I don’t make a thing about my own special day, this one has me thinking a little bit more than some others.

I guess it should. I mean, I’ve lasted longer than I ever thought that I would; I have more years under my belt than my children can fathom. It’s worth a little bit of contemplation.

I think about varying topics: Where am I in my life? Have I achieved any of my goals? Made any dreams come true? Am I content? Do I have any regrets? Did I imagine my life looking like this at this point?

I think about my mid-section. I have a roll. No matter how many miles I run and stomach crunches I do, I still have a special softness that sits somewhere between my boobs and ass, which are both, by the way, considerably lower than they were half a lifetime ago.

What do I do with that?

I open my bedside drawer, withdraw the spoon and Nutella and ponder my midlife midsection. I thought today, “I understand why Demi Moore had a knee lift.”

I look in the mirror (wearing my bifocals) and accept that now that I actually have a valid reason to dye my hair (besides a break-up) I can’t be bothered. Way too much energy. I figure if I don’t own a hairbrush, why on earth should I exhaust myself coloring gray, which is futile at best.

Will I look like a bag lady soon? Will I allow myself to cruise the aisles of City Market in sweatpants, even when I haven’t just run? Will I really still run?

The great thing about 50 (yes, 50 years) is that I no longer feel inadequate when everyone around me is running 100-mile races. I have an excuse – I don’t want to be one of those mid-life-crisis-people- who-has-to-prove-to-myself-and- the-world-that-I-am-not-aging. I tell myself that I am handling the downward slide with grace.

It’s the best justification for sitting on my ass that I’ve had in a long time.

One interesting thing that’s happened is a return to my roots. Carhartt, Patagonia, and Montrail are no longer the primary “designer” labels in my closet. Now it’s Lilly, Tretorn, and Sperry; I own boat shoes — the same boat shoes as my 80-year-old mother, to be exact.

Those boat shoes might not make a lot of sense for living in Mancos, Colo.; can’t brand cows, climb a peak, or scramble through a canyon sporting them, but they do make sense for the life in Florida that I can now imagine.

Right? Florida? I must be getting old. 5 x 10, to be exact.

I scan my brain, my heart, for regrets. I have none. Oh, sure, I would like to have figured out how to manage money before now – and actually, I still haven’t, so let’s hope I have a few years left to do that.

And I would have liked to travel more than I did before marriage, house, children. But, the way things are going, I still have time for that. And the flip side of that is that I have three amazing boys who are way more entertaining than a beach in Fiji.

Sort of.

I don’t regret my lousy marriage – without it I wouldn’t have said boys. I don’t actually regret any of my past relationships.

My choices, actions, and (perceived) successes and failures have gotten me right here, and I am happy right here, so how can I question any of those things?

I do, however, wonder when some of my unhealthy choices might catch up to me. I figure the consequences might start showing up hand in hand with menopause – a life event about which I fantasized during every bout of puberty-induced PMS I endured, but I am discovering that the reality is nowhere near as pleasant as the fantasy.

Oh well, C’est la Vie. It’s not like I can do anything about it.

I look at photos of high-school friends. Many of them actually look middle-aged — doughy, matronly, real candidates for a good dye job and maybe face-lift — and I feel good that I still appear to be relatively spry.

Then I take a good look and realize that I have become my mother. Not necessarily a bad thing – my mom, although 80, is a gorgeous woman who still travels to Paris every year and swims in the ocean. But she’s 80 and I look exactly like her.

I have also, even though we haven’t even lived in the same town, much less under the same roof in 30 years, acquired every gesture, intonation, cackle, of hers. How the F@#$ does that happen?

The only thing of my father’s I’ve developed is his nervous hand-wringing.

Wringing my hands while I cackle away at some story I’ve told at least 100 times…

I must be 50.

At least my brother is still older than I am.

Suzanne Strazza writes from Mancos, Colo.

Published in Suzanne Strazza

Free Press wins 9 awards, 6 firsts

The Four Corners Free Press received nine awards, six of them first-place, in the Society of Professional Journalists’ Top of the Rockies regional competition for work done in 2014. The awards were announced May 15 in Denver.

The winners were as follows.

First place:

▪ Headline-writing, Gail Binkly and Rhonda Binkly. The judge’s comment was: “Interesting headlines with catchy phrasing that will make readers want to read the stories.”

▪ Editorials, Gail Binkly and David Long. Three editorials about a controversy involving the Cortez Sanitation District, the Dolores River Valley Plan, and the need for political candidates to speak the truth.

▪ General reporting, series or package – Gail Binkly and David Long, “Strained relations,” a two-part series about carbon-dioxide company Kinder Morgan’s relationship with Montezuma County. “This series is a nice illustration of an obviously tense to the point of ugliness relationship between a county and a company giant that has a variety of implications for all residents and players involved.”

▪ Legal general reporting, Sonja Horoshko, “Racial-discrimination lawsuit still pending,” about a lawsuit involving voting districts in San Juan County, Utah. “Good reporting on a tough issue.”

▪ Arts and entertainment single story, Sonja Horoshko, “Artistic uprising,” about a new Indian Market that arose in Santa Fe, N.M., out of dissatisfaction with the traditional market. “Fascinating look at the inner workings of the Indian Art Market and the changes the artists face during a tough transition. Really clear writing and pace.”

▪ Agriculture reporting, enterprise, Paul Ferrell, “For hemp advocates, green could mean gold.” “An interesting look at the history, uses and issues with the hemp industry along the Western Slope in Colorado. Well researched and an interesting read.”

Second place:

▪ News reporting, single story – Gail Binkly, “Debate still raging over Dolores River Valley Plan.” “The reporter takes the reader into a community to show conflicts that can stymie progress that some seek for their future and the environment.”

Third:

▪ Arts and entertainment single story, Janneli F. Miller, “Shall we dance?” “Fun story.”

▪ Business general reporting, Paul Ferrell. “Red Arrow Mine owner says he’s done no wrong.”

The annual competition includes media outlets from four states: Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Wyoming. The Free Press competes in the under-10,000 circulation category. Other newspapers competing in that category included the Colorado Springs Business Journal, Southern Utah Drum, Albuquerque Business, Evergreen Newspapers, Biz West, New Mexico Street Press, Xconomy, and New Mexico In Depth.

Published in May 2015

Pondering NEPA

A lot of talk is going on about forest insects and disease and wildfires and the effects upon the forest health and environment. Not too much is said about the impact on local economies and futures.

Few people visiting a city plan to take walks down alleys where the walls of buildings are covered with filthy graffiti and trash is strewn around. So will they want to take hikes, mountain bike and Jeep rides through a trashy-looking forest of dead trees killed by bugs, charred from fire and falling down blocking the roads and trails? Hey, let’s take a vacation and stay a week at a motel in Dolores, Colo., and take day trips out to see some hillsides of dying trees. Can’t get in to them since the roads are blocked, but it should be worth the trip anyway, right?

If we know the forest health is deteriorating, and it is, and will, further deteriorate our local economy, why aren’t we doing anything about it? Several reasons, with the lead one being federal laws, regulations and policies. These come out through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). If you want to do anything beneficial you have to follow the NEPA process to evaluate everything on paper and make big reports.

This works very well to drag things out and give opportunity for some groups to sue to stop the beneficial work. One of the top problems in the process is with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). For example, a review would need to be done to see if there could be any New Mexico jumping mice or spotted owls in the project area, just to name a couple. So a paper study is looked at to see if there is any potential habitat in the area. Uhoh, there is a pond with some sedges around it, and oh, my, there is an old tree, can’t do a project there as that might disturb something that probably is not there, but could be, so can’t do it.

All this endangered-species talk got me to wondering. The environmental groups claim about 10,000 species go extinct every year. They also claim about 10,000 new species are found every year. Is the 10M that went extinct the same as the 10M they didn’t know was here? But then if the 10M didn’t go extinct, where would we be as we accumulate 10M more every year for the past several thousand years?

Truth is, they don’t have a clue about any of it. Could it be that the extinction process is actually part of the Creator’s plan? A bunch of us all die off every day to make room for the new ones, right? So why are we ruining our resources and economy to attempt to keep some bird or mouse from making room for a different and maybe better one, for the current changing conditions? Sure glad someone didn’t save the dinosaurs when their time and purpose was up.

Then I wonder who decides which mouse or bird gets our blessing to be saved over the others? And what is in it for them? Makes me wonder if our Creator doesn’t get a little frustrated with those that try, for their own gain, to usurp His role in this game of life? It is interesting to note that there is no documentation that the ESA’s “do nothing” rule has ever saved anything from extinction. Active direct management has promoted population growth, though.

The favorite one that is quoted is the hoax of DDT causing bald eagles’ population to decline. In support of the rising pseudo-environmental demands, DDT was banned to “save” the Eagle. Not really! Later found to not be true at all, but the ban was successful in revitalizing and saving malaria, which had been brought under dramatic control by its use. The result has been death (extinction) of 96 million people since 1973. Had the true objective of the ESA actually been met? It makes you wonder, when the U.N. executive secretary for the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Christiana Figureres, recently stated, “We should make every effort to depopulate the planet.” I don’t see her leading by example, though. Our federal laws, policies and regulations are formulated from the U.N. policies, resulting in reduced resource management and use, businesses, jobs and economy.

Can we restore the health of our forests, which will improve our economy and make for a better life for all in our area? You bet we can! We are blessed with very good agricultural lands, forests, range lands, wildlife, water, minerals and recreation potential! Just need to shake off the shackles of slavery placed on us by the Eastern-controlled federal government. We have been acting like the old hermit that lived in a shack, wearing rags and eating hardtack. He died and they found he had a million dollars stashed in the shack. Why didn’t he use it to live more healthy and happy?

Dexter Gill is a retired forest manager who worked for private industry, three Western state forestry agencies, and the Navajo Nation forestry department. He writes from Lewis, Colo.

Published in Dexter Gill